‘역량’ 개념에 관한 유교 교육적 고찰
A Confucianism Educational Consideration on the Concept of ‘Competency’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to examine the core competencies required to form a whole person by classifying them into individual factors and social factors, this is to derive the universality of confucianism's competency. The essence of the competency concept examined in this paper is summarized as follows. First, confucianism's competency is the concept of the whole. Individual competency is a concept of the whole that combines power to know the virtue, power to do self-cultivation, and power to practice the virtue. Like individual competencies, social competencies are the concept of the whole. Social competence is a combination of the real ability to communicate based on personality, the real ability to inherit the culture, and the real ability to contribute to the community. Second, confucianism's competency is a complex concept. Competency as a condition of becoming a whole person is a complex concept in which individual and social dimensions are combined into one.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the core competencies required to form a whole person by classifying them into individual factors and social factors, this is to derive the universality of confucianism's competency. The essence of the competency concept examined in this paper is summarized as follows. First, confucianism's competency is the concept of the whole. Individual competency is a concept of the whole that combines power to know the virtue, power to do self-cultivation, and power to practice the virtue. Like individual competencies, social competencies are the concept of the whole. Social competence is a combination of the real ability to communicate based on personality, the real ability to inherit the culture, and the real ability to contribute to the community. Second, confucianism's competency is a complex concept. Competency as a condition of becoming a whole person is a complex concept in which individual and social dimensions are combined into one.
참고문헌 (27)
- 朱熹, "四書章句集註" (1989), 齊魯書社
- 胡廣, "四書大全" (1989), 山東友誼書社
- 朱傑人, "朱子全書" (2002), 上海古籍出版社
- 黎靖德, "朱子語類" (1999), 中華書局
- 朱熹, "近思錄" (1995), 學民文化社
- 商務印書館四庫全書出版工作委員會, "晦庵集" (2005), 商務印書館
- 胡廣, "性理大全" (1984), 保景文化社
- 교육부, "초·중등학교 교육과정 총론" (2015), 교육부
- 강민수, "인성교육의 정책 실천에서 드러난 교육적 역설", 교육연구논총, 41(4), pp.37~62 (2020), 교육연구소[DOI]
- 김영건, "동양철학에 대한 분석적 비판" (2009), 라티오 출판사
- 김철운, "유가가 보는 평천하의 세계" (2001), 철학과 현실사
- 김충열, "김충열 교수의 중용대학강의" (2007), 예문서원
- 김학주, "근사록" (2004), 명문당
- 박길수, "도덕 심리학과 도덕 철학의 이중적 변주 －맹자 심성론 및 수양론의 본질과 특징", 철학연구, (48), pp.35~90 (2013), 철학연구소
- 박용호, "역량에 대한 재탐구 : 개념이해 및 활용에서의 혼동 뛰어넘기", 평생교육 · HRD연구, 14(3), pp.89~113 (2018), 한국평생교육ㆍHRD연구소[DOI]
- 심승우, "민주적 시민성에 대한 동서양 교육철학의 통섭 모색", 한국교육학연구, 23(1), pp.139~163 (2017), 안암교육학회[DOI]
- 윤용남, "완역 성리대전 1-10" (2018), 학고방
- 윤정일, "인간 능력으로서의 역량에 대한 고찰 : 역량의 특성과 차원", 교육학연구, 45(3), pp.233~260 (2007), 한국교육학회
- 임헌규, "3대 주석과 함께 읽는 논어Ⅰ·Ⅱ·Ⅲ" (2020), 모시는사람들
- 이상익, "주자학의 길" (2007), 심산출판사
- 이승환, "<소통> 유교전통에서 본 ‘소통의 정치’", 오늘의 동양사상, 22, pp.83~100 (2011), 예문동양사상연구원
- 이주행, "朱子語類" (2001), 소나무
- 이지혜, "도덕성 발달 연구를 위한 역량중심 접근의 개념화", 인간발달연구, 18(2), pp.227~254 (2011), 한국인간발달학회
- 한성구, "유학 교육사상과 민주적 시민성 함양 연구", 유학연구, 45, pp.375~403 (2018), 유학연구소[DOI]
- 한용진, "한국의 전인적 인간교육 개념의 전환", 한국홀리스틱융합교육학회 학술대회, pp.319~334 (2019)
- 함규진, "전통 사상 및 교육 방법의 현대 도덕교육과정에서의 활용 가능성 연구", 한국철학논집, (50), pp.363~389 (2016), 한국철학사연구회[DOI]
- Athey, Timothy P., "Emerging competency methods for the future", Human Resource Management, 38(3), pp.215~225 (1999)