생명과학 분야 대학수학능력시험 및 고등학교 정기고사 문항 비교 분석
Comparative Analysis of Life Science Items of Korean Scholastic Aptitude Test and Regular High School Examinations
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to comparatively analyse life science items of KCSAT (Korean College Scholastic Aptitude Test) and regular high school examinations, and to examine the item-taking tendency of them the relation to the assessment goals of science curriculum. Regular examination papers of life science I and II were collected from high schools, and KCSAT papers were collected from KICE(Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation) for this study. The results of analysis showed that both regular high school exams and the KCSAT allocated more proportions to the domain of scientific knowledge than that of inquiry. The proportions among subject area of items of regular high school examinations were different from those of KCSAT. For life science I of regular high school exams, the proportions of domains and subject area were different according to the learning course(humanities course and natural sciences course). The findings showed that a balanced evaluation that reflected the intent of science curriculum has not been performed. It is also needed to achieve consistency in items between regular high school exams and the KCSAT.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to comparatively analyse life science items of KCSAT (Korean College Scholastic Aptitude Test) and regular high school examinations, and to examine the item-taking tendency of them the relation to the assessment goals of science curriculum. Regular examination papers of life science I and II were collected from high schools, and KCSAT papers were collected from KICE(Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation) for this study. The results of analysis showed that both regular high school exams and the KCSAT allocated more proportions to the domain of scientific knowledge than that of inquiry. The proportions among subject area of items of regular high school examinations were different from those of KCSAT. For life science I of regular high school exams, the proportions of domains and subject area were different according to the learning course(humanities course and natural sciences course). The findings showed that a balanced evaluation that reflected the intent of science curriculum has not been performed. It is also needed to achieve consistency in items between regular high school exams and the KCSAT.
참고문헌 (36)
- Cho, H. H., (2011), Kyoyookbook
- Chung, W. H., "An analysis on the biology testing items of national entrance examination for the university from 1969 to 1992", Biology Education, 22(1), pp.37~47 (1994)
- Chung, Y. L., "Understanding biotechnology : an analysis of high school students’ concepts", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 18(4), pp.463~472 (1998)
- (2018)[URL]
- 정은영, "우리나라 초·중·고등학교 과학과의 평가 실태", 과학교육연구지, 38(1), pp.168~181 (2014), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 김복미, "중등생물교사임용시험 교과내용학 및 교과교육학 문항 분석을 통한 생물과 예비교사교육에 대한 시사점", 생물교육, 44(1), pp.179~189 (2016), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- "Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education", 1986, 9~14
- Kim. H. J., "An investigation on science teachers’ evaluation practices in the secondary schools", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), pp.101~111 (2000)
- 김현정, "대학수학능력시험 과학탐구 영역 평가 틀의 행동 영역에 대한 고찰", 현장과학교육, 10(1), pp.83~94 (2016), 한국현장과학교육학회[DOI]
- 김경미, "과학과 평가 영역간의 중요도에 관한 교사들의 인식에 관한 연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), pp.540~549 (2002), 한국과학교육학회
- "Kim, M. Y.", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Research Rep. ORM 2014-59-5 (2014)
- 김성기, "중학교 과학과 서술형 평가의 문항 특성 및 요인 분석", 대한화학회지, 59(5), pp.445~453 (2015), 대한화학회[DOI]
- "Kim, S. D.", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Research Rep. ORM 2005-51-5 (2005)
- A Study on Reporting and Analyzing Scores of CSAT, "Kim, S. Y.", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Research Rep. RRE 98-5 (1998)
- 김영민, "학생의 과학학습 관련 국내 과학교육 연구 동향 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(4), pp.751~772 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Kim, Y, S., (2012), Freedom academy
- 이봉우, "중등과학교사임용시험 문항에 나타난 과학교육학 이론의 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(4), pp.794~806 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- A study on the Reliability Improvement of School Performance, "Lee, I. J.", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Research Rep. RRE 2004-8 (2004)
- A Study on the Improvement of College Scholastic Ability Test, "Lee. J. S.", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Research Rep. RRE 2004-9 (2004)
- A Proposal for the Long-term Improvement of the College Scholastic Ability Test, "Lee, K. N.", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Research Rep. RRE 98-7 (1998)
- The Development of National Curriculum-based Assessment Standards for High School Common Science: High School General Science, "Lee, Y. R.", Korea Institute of Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.Research Rep. RRE 98-3-7 (1998)
- 임수민, "중학교 자극과 반응 단원에서 교사의 수업 목표, 수업 후 학생의 획득 지식과 평가 문항 사이의 일치도 분석", 생물교육, 39(1), pp.95~105 (2011), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, "2009 Revised Science Curriculum", Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, ~ (2009)
- Ministry of Education, "2015 Revised Science Curriculum", Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
- 노태희, "중등 과학교사의 과학 평가 실태와 지향", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(4), pp.725~733 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 오현석, "현행 중등학교 과학 교과 지필평가 문항분석", 교육과정평가연구, 9(1), pp.405~424 (2006), 한국교육과정평가원
- 박현주, "중학교 과학과 총괄 지필평가 문항의 목표 분석", 과학교육연구지, 36(2), pp.293~302 (2012), 과학교육연구소[DOI]
- 박현주, "화학 I 교과서의 학습 목표 및 평가 문항 분석", 대한화학회지, 56(4), pp.491~499 (2012), 대한화학회[DOI]
- 박현주, "과학교육 내용표준 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(4), pp.729~750 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 송신철, "생명공학 기술에 대한 고등학교 학생들의 인식 조사 연구", 환경교육, 23(1), pp.99~111 (2010), 한국환경교육학회
- Woo, J. W., "Classification and statement of evaluating objectives using three-dimensional assesment framework of science inquiry", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 16(3), pp.270~277 (1996)
- Woo, J. W., "Development of national assessment system", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 18(4), pp.617~626 (1998)
- Woo, J. W., "Longitudinal study about science process skills item forms transition before and after scholastic ability test for college", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 6(3), pp.314~328 (1996)
- 유재석, "고등학교 및 대학수학능력 시험의 생물 문항 비교분석 연구", 생물교육, 37(1), pp.85~96 (2009), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 유미현, "과학 잡지를 활용한 수업이 과학 비전공 고등학생들의 과학에 대한 태도 및 과학자에 대한 이미지에 미치는 영향", 교육과정평가연구, 10(1), pp.211~230 (2007), 한국교육과정평가원
