본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

1940년대 한국 공장공업의 연속성의 정도에 대한 분석 정도에 대한 분석

An analysis of continuity of factories during 1940s in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This paper examines whether the development of the economy of the Chosun Dynasty under the Japanese rule was continued or discontinued by the Korean economy after the Liberation from Japanese rule. In spite of its importance in Korean modern history, this issue is very difficult to explain objectively. To pursue the issue further, first, I compare The List of Factories as of 1938 with The List of Factories as of 1949, which reveals the number of continued factories owned by Koreans. Secondly, I investigate how many Korean factory owners still remained in The List of Factories in 1949 in comparison with those which were listed in The List of Factories as of 1938. As a result, I found that 4.9% of factories and only 3.8% of Korean factory owners in The List of Factories as of 1938 survived, compared to The List of Factories as of 1949. This result suggest that the factories in The List of Factories 1949 indeed were not related to those that existed in 1938. This ratio is substantially small in comparison to 17% of Korean factory continuity and 23.3% of Korean factory owner continuity respectively between 1930 and 1938. In conclusion, Korean factories and Korean factory owners experienced a dramatic change during the 1940s, and a few of them survived after the 1950s. Almost all of the factories run in 1949 emerged after the Liberation of 1945.

Abstract

This paper examines whether the development of the economy of the Chosun Dynasty under the Japanese rule was continued or discontinued by the Korean economy after the Liberation from Japanese rule. In spite of its importance in Korean modern history, this issue is very difficult to explain objectively. To pursue the issue further, first, I compare The List of Factories as of 1938 with The List of Factories as of 1949, which reveals the number of continued factories owned by Koreans. Secondly, I investigate how many Korean factory owners still remained in The List of Factories in 1949 in comparison with those which were listed in The List of Factories as of 1938. As a result, I found that 4.9% of factories and only 3.8% of Korean factory owners in The List of Factories as of 1938 survived, compared to The List of Factories as of 1949. This result suggest that the factories in The List of Factories 1949 indeed were not related to those that existed in 1938. This ratio is substantially small in comparison to 17% of Korean factory continuity and 23.3% of Korean factory owner continuity respectively between 1930 and 1938. In conclusion, Korean factories and Korean factory owners experienced a dramatic change during the 1940s, and a few of them survived after the 1950s. Almost all of the factories run in 1949 emerged after the Liberation of 1945.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. K. Moskowitz, "The Employees of Japanese Banks in Colonial Korea", pp.211~ (1978), Harvard University
  2. 김낙년, "일제하 한국경제", pp.286~ (2003), 해남
  3. 이대근, "정부수립후 귀속사업체의 실태와 그 처리과정, In 근대조선공업화의 연구", pp.298~ (1993), 일조각
  4. 허수열, "개발 없는 개발" (2005), 은행나무
  5. "조선공장명부", ~ (1940)
  6. 동양경제신보사, "朝鮮産業の共榮圈參加體制", pp.56~ (1942)
  7. "帝國議會說明資料, 제10권", 153~154
  8. "조선연감", ~ (1949)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)