본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

야담잡지를 통한 역사소설가로서의 김동인 재조명: 일제강점기 단군 소설화 양상과 관련하여

The reillustration of the Kim Dong-in as a historical novelist through an unofficial historical story: On the feature of the Japanese colonial rule period's Dangun novelization

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

Until now Kim Dong In as the historical novelist has been estimated as the pro-Japanese oriented writer for the sake of full-length novel at that time's newspapers. In considering the Dangun suppression level of the period of Japanese colonial rule, however, Kim Dong In's whereabouts which were thoroughly seen through the journal of an unofficial historical story where the 「The Heritage of the Three States」, that is the precedent of Dangun, was publicly released and circulated present counter reasons that were not intended to be included into the colonial rule theory in itself. In comparison with the Choi Nam Sun calling Dangun's attention at the domain of verse who entered the group 'The chosun history compilation committee' which strongly angered Japan's Dangun obliteration policy in 1928, after that, no more called Dangun's attention, Kim Dong In although novelizing Dangun belately in 1930's had been continued that works after the liberation of the Japanese colonial rule. But, the historical novel through an unofficial historical story including Kim Dong In's relevant novels could not be found the consciousness to wipe out the opinion <Dangun=Susanou> which had been taken advantage of the Japan-Chosun conformity theory in the period of Japanese colonial rule. That only in the level of emphazing the Chosun's everlasting history through the Dangun and after liberating the Japanese colonial rule is showing the situation of presenting the image distinctly. Hereby the remainder of work is how to see the dangerousness which is intended to include the myth of Dangun into the history through the novel although 「The Heritage of the Three States」, that is the precedent of Dangun. This is obivous that the opinion <Dangun=Susanou> is derivated from the precedent 「The Chronical Heritage of Japan」 on the opposite side of the Korean people's Nationalism creation through the myth of Dangun. The interesting fact in connection with this content is that on the one hand, the Dangun, having been widespreadly considered as the heteronymous same phantom of the Susanou inside of the Japan-Chosun conformity theory, was located in the level of the translation release and just mention by the the journal of an unofficial historical story which were relevantly free from the Japanese censorship in the colonized Chosun, on the other hand, in the colonial Japan, the Susanou was all the more released by the newspaper as the image of doubting the Imperialism. This enables us to reconsider the myth, the history, and the function of literature in the theory of colonial rule pattern.

Abstract

Until now Kim Dong In as the historical novelist has been estimated as the pro-Japanese oriented writer for the sake of full-length novel at that time's newspapers. In considering the Dangun suppression level of the period of Japanese colonial rule, however, Kim Dong In's whereabouts which were thoroughly seen through the journal of an unofficial historical story where the 「The Heritage of the Three States」, that is the precedent of Dangun, was publicly released and circulated present counter reasons that were not intended to be included into the colonial rule theory in itself. In comparison with the Choi Nam Sun calling Dangun's attention at the domain of verse who entered the group 'The chosun history compilation committee' which strongly angered Japan's Dangun obliteration policy in 1928, after that, no more called Dangun's attention, Kim Dong In although novelizing Dangun belately in 1930's had been continued that works after the liberation of the Japanese colonial rule. But, the historical novel through an unofficial historical story including Kim Dong In's relevant novels could not be found the consciousness to wipe out the opinion <Dangun=Susanou> which had been taken advantage of the Japan-Chosun conformity theory in the period of Japanese colonial rule. That only in the level of emphazing the Chosun's everlasting history through the Dangun and after liberating the Japanese colonial rule is showing the situation of presenting the image distinctly. Hereby the remainder of work is how to see the dangerousness which is intended to include the myth of Dangun into the history through the novel although 「The Heritage of the Three States」, that is the precedent of Dangun. This is obivous that the opinion <Dangun=Susanou> is derivated from the precedent 「The Chronical Heritage of Japan」 on the opposite side of the Korean people's Nationalism creation through the myth of Dangun. The interesting fact in connection with this content is that on the one hand, the Dangun, having been widespreadly considered as the heteronymous same phantom of the Susanou inside of the Japan-Chosun conformity theory, was located in the level of the translation release and just mention by the the journal of an unofficial historical story which were relevantly free from the Japanese censorship in the colonized Chosun, on the other hand, in the colonial Japan, the Susanou was all the more released by the newspaper as the image of doubting the Imperialism. This enables us to reconsider the myth, the history, and the function of literature in the theory of colonial rule pattern.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. "月刊野談", ~
  2. "野談", ~
  3. "東亞日報", ~
  4. "東光", ~
  5. "中外日報", ~
  6. "中央日報", ~
  7. "朝鮮中央日報", ~
  8. "每日新報", ~
  9. "국사편찬위원회 한국사데이터베이스"[URL]
  10. 강영주, "한국 역사소설의 재인식", pp.66~ (1991), 창작과비평사
  11. 고은지, "20세기 '대중 오락'으로 새로 태어난 '야담'의 실체", 정신문화연구, 31(1), pp.103~129 (2008), 한국학중앙연구원
  12. 공임순, "재미있고 유익하게, ‘건전한’ 취미독물 야담의 프로파간다화", 민족문학사연구, (34), pp.336~364 (2007), 민족문학사학회
  13. 金東仁, "朝鮮史溫古(말 못하던 史疑)", pp.1~ (1947), 相互出版社
  14. 金東仁, "史譚集 東仁全集第九卷", pp.261~ (1964), 弘字出版社
  15. 金東仁, "金東仁全集 13", pp.286~ (1987), 朝鮮日報社
  16. 金東仁, "金東仁全集 4", pp.306~ (1988), 朝鮮日報社
  17. 金東仁, "金東仁全集 14", pp.357~363 (1988), 朝鮮日報社
  18. 김두진, "『삼국유사』 板本의 校勘과 역주본", 韓國史學報, (29), pp.41~70 (2007), 고려사학회
  19. 김병길, "역사소설, 자미(滋味)에 빠지다", pp.290~ (2011), 삼인
  20. 김윤식, "김동인 연구", pp.508~521 (2000), 민음사
  21. 金麗柒, "開化期國史敎科書를 通해서 본 歷史認識(Ⅰ)-歷史輯略을 中心으로-", 史學志, 14, pp.107~143 (1980), 단군사학회
  22. 琴章泰, "中山 朴章鉉 硏究-日帝下 民族主義 史學者-", pp.398~ (1994), 民族文化社
  23. 유순영, "단군역사의 소설화에 대하여", 한민족문화연구, 3, pp.19~42 (1998), 한민족문화학회
  24. 유영옥, "1920년대 『三國遺事』에 대한 인식- 丹齋와 六堂을 중심으로 -", 동양한문학연구, 29(29), pp.177~212 (2009), 동양한문학회
  25. 윤호진, "한국한문학연구의 문화적 지평과 그 연구 방향의 모색-김동인의 야담작품에 대한 연구의 필요성과 그 문학성-", 漢文學報, 24, pp.153~170 (2011), 우리한문학회
  26. 이경돈, "『別乾坤』과 近代 趣味讀物", 대동문화연구, (46), pp.249~287 (2004), 대동문화연구원
  27. 이민희, "아쿠타가와 류노스케(芥川龍之介)의 「스사노오노 미코토(素戔嗚尊)」론― 1920년대 내셔널리즘 창출로서의 스사노오(素戔嗚) 신화와 관련하여 ―", 일본학보, (89), pp.141~154 (2011), 한국일본학회
  28. 이재원, "‘단군’을 소재로 한 소설 고찰", 고조선단군학, 15, pp.137~170 (2006), 고조선단군학회
  29. 임형택, "야담의 근대적 변모-日帝下에서 野談傳統의 계승양상", 韓國漢文學硏究, 19, pp.47~85 (1996), 한국한문학회
  30. 임형택, "韓國近代文學史論", pp.117~118 (1993), 한길사
  31. 임종국, "親日文學論", pp.192~198 (1966), 平和出版社
  32. 조윤정, "최남선의 신화 연구와 문학의 관련 양상", 한국현대문학연구, (22), pp.39~74 (2007), 한국현대문학회
  33. 차혜영, "1930년대 『월간야담』과 『야담』의 자리, In 희귀 잡지로 본 문학사", pp.71~95 (2000), 깊은샘
  34. 崔景鎬, "역사적 진실과 서사적 진실", 어문학, 61, pp.291~314 (1997), 한국어문학회
  35. 崔南善, "新韓國文學全集 14", pp.119~ (1980), 語文閣
  36. 崔錫榮, "일제의 동화이데올로기의 창출", pp.304~305 (1997), 서경문화사
  37. 홍순애, "한국근대문학과 알레고리", pp.259~282 (2009), 제이엔씨출판사
  38. 小島憲之他, "新編日本古典文學全集2日本書紀①", pp.98~ (2002), 小学館
  39. 小林寛, "朴章鉉에 있어서의 「檀君」", 단군학연구, pp.373~400 (1999), 단군학회
  40. 全成坤, "崔南善論:植民地期朝鮮における檀君論とナショナリズムの創出", 박사, pp.2004
  41. 保坂祐二, "日帝の同化政策に利用された神話", 일어일문학연구, 35, pp.373~398 (1999), 한국일어일문학회

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)