악비와 문천상 小傳
A Short biographies of Yue Fei(岳飛) and Wen Tian-Xiang(文天祥)
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the time-honored Chinese history of dynasties that have had a lot of faithful retainers and ardent patriots, nobody would deny that Yue Fei(岳飛) and Wen Tian-Xiang(文天祥) are the best national heroes and their historical achievement have been consistently commemorating until now. This essay deals with these two figures’s journey thorough life with the context of the Southern Song dynasty’s history when they were situated in. Yue Fei had spent his pinnacle of life at the very start point of Southern Song dynasty while Wen Tian-Xiang did the opposite – the final scene of the dynasty, therefore another effect of making a general survey of Southern Song dynasty’s history are also obtained when we trace two person’s footsteps and especially Southern Song dynasty’s international circumstances that are very important facts determining Song dynasty’s directions. Follow are some facts we can point out when Yue Fei and Wen Tian-Xiang are compared to each other. Firstly, they were influenced by the confucian culture and became to be a distinguished paragon that Confucianism need. Secondly, they tried to be loyal and patriotic and devote themselves to theirs country. Thirdly, they were bilious temperament and staunch with moral integrity. Fourthly, Wen Tian-Xiang died from national calamity caused by foreign aggression while Yue Fei died from more complicated tragic elements containing political conflict and personality traits. Fifthly, after they died, Wen Tian-Xiang had a strong influence basically on shi-da-fu(士大夫: a high government official) while Yue Fei had a wider influence on the public as well as shi-da-fu.
Abstract
In the time-honored Chinese history of dynasties that have had a lot of faithful retainers and ardent patriots, nobody would deny that Yue Fei(岳飛) and Wen Tian-Xiang(文天祥) are the best national heroes and their historical achievement have been consistently commemorating until now. This essay deals with these two figures’s journey thorough life with the context of the Southern Song dynasty’s history when they were situated in. Yue Fei had spent his pinnacle of life at the very start point of Southern Song dynasty while Wen Tian-Xiang did the opposite – the final scene of the dynasty, therefore another effect of making a general survey of Southern Song dynasty’s history are also obtained when we trace two person’s footsteps and especially Southern Song dynasty’s international circumstances that are very important facts determining Song dynasty’s directions. Follow are some facts we can point out when Yue Fei and Wen Tian-Xiang are compared to each other. Firstly, they were influenced by the confucian culture and became to be a distinguished paragon that Confucianism need. Secondly, they tried to be loyal and patriotic and devote themselves to theirs country. Thirdly, they were bilious temperament and staunch with moral integrity. Fourthly, Wen Tian-Xiang died from national calamity caused by foreign aggression while Yue Fei died from more complicated tragic elements containing political conflict and personality traits. Fifthly, after they died, Wen Tian-Xiang had a strong influence basically on shi-da-fu(士大夫: a high government official) while Yue Fei had a wider influence on the public as well as shi-da-fu.
참고문헌 (17)
- 周国平, "文天祥勤王幕府述论", 河北学刊, 1(23) (2003)
- 桑原騰藏, "蒲寿庚の事蹟" (1989), 平凡社
- 毛佳佳, "蒲寿庚事迹考", 海交史研究, 1 (2012)
- 王曾瑜, "南宋亡国的压山海战述评", 南开学报, 1 (2008)
- 屈守元, "文天祥与杜甫", 杜甫研究学刊, 4 (2000)
- 俞兆鹏, "试论文璧降元问题", 南昌大学学报, 3 (2007)
- 刘春华, "论文天祥忠义之特点", 淮北煤炭师范学院学报, 4(29) (2008)
- 马强, "岳飞与文天祥比较研究", 岳飛硏究, 4 (1993), 중화서국
- 江华, "论岳飞、文天祥的人生悲剧", 社会科学辑刊, 2 (2000)
- 蒋子龙, "什么人死后会成神", 杂文月刊, 7 (2008)
- 梁衡, "岳飞文天祥是不是民族英雄", 新聞實踐, 1 (2009)
- 高茂兵, "文天祥祠考論", 玉林师范学院学报, 1 (2008)
- 刘红艳, "文天祥祠的特色与价值", 文物世界, 5 (2011)
- 熊锐, "浅论明末清初士大夫心态—以王夫之对文天祥之批判为中心", 武汉文博, 4 (2011)
- 조지형, "조선 전기 ‘岳飛’ 故事의 수용과 인물 형상의 정립 과정", 대동문화연구, 77(77), pp.269~299 (2012), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- 김상엽, "규장각 소장 ≪會纂宋岳卾武穆王精忠錄≫揷畵", 미술사논단, 9 (1999)
- 안장리, "鄭夢周와 文天祥의 忠臣像 비교", 포은학연구, 12, pp.199~228 (2013), 포은학회
