초등 예비교사의 사회 속의 과학 쟁점에 대한 논변에서 나타나는 소집단 상호작용 분석

키워드

참고문헌 (52)

1. 2009년 개정 과학과 교육과정, "교육과학기술부", ~ (2009)
2. 박인옥, "생명윤리와 생명윤리교육에 대한 초등학교 교사의 인식 조사", 한국초등과학교육학회지, 24(5), pp.571~582 (2005)
3. 박인옥, "생명윤리와 생명윤리교육에 대한 중·고등학교 교사의 인식 조사", 생물교육, 33(4), pp.491~504 (2005), 한국생물교육학회
4. 박지영, "사회 속 과학 쟁점에 대한 소집단 논변활동의 이해:교육대학교 학생들의 의사소통 분위기를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2009
5. 이현주, "과학과 관련된 윤리적·사회적 문제 도입 측면에서의 미국 주별 과학과 교육과정 및 중등 과학교사의 인식 탐색", 교육과정평가연구, 10(1), pp.189~209 (2007), 한국교육과정평가원
6. 이효녕, "학교과학교육에서의 논증활동 활용에 대한 교사들의 인식", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(6), pp.666~679 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
7. Abd-El-Khalick, "Socioscientific issues in pre-college science classroom, In The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues in Science Education" (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers
8. Aikenhead, G. S., "Science Education for Everyday Life" (2006), Teachers College Press
9. Anderson, R. C., "The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children", Cognition and Instruction, 19(1), pp.1~46 (2001)
10. Barron, A. E., "Large-scale research study on technology in K-12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the national technology standards", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), pp.489~507 (2003)
11. Belk, C., "Biology: Science Forlife", pp.2004, Pearson
12. Berkowitz, M. W., "Integrating science education and character education, In The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education", pp.117~138 (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers
13. Charmaz, K., "Grounded theory in the 21st century: A qualitative method for advancing social justice research, In Handbook of Qualitative Research 3rd ed", pp.507~535 (2005), Sage
14. Dawson, V., "High-school students' informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: an indicator of scientific literacy", International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), pp.1421~1445 (2009)
15. Dillon, J., "Science Education in Europe: Report to the Nuffield Foundation" (2007), King's College London
16. Dori, Y. J., "Teaching biotechnology through case studies - Can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors", Science Education, 87, pp.767~793 (2003)
17. Engle, R. A., "Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom", Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), pp.399~483 (2002)
18. Erduran, S., "TAPping into argumentation: developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse", Science Education, 99, pp.915~933 (2004)
19. Felton, M., "The development of discourse strategies in adolescent argumentation", Cognitive Development, 19, pp.35~52 (2004)
20. Hogan, K., "Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students' collaborative scientific reasoning", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), pp.1085~1109 (1999)
21. Holbrook, J., "Nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy", International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), pp.1347~1362 (2007)
22. Jimenex-Alexandre, M. P., "Designing argumentation learning environments, In Argumentation in Science Education: Recent Developments and Future Directions", pp.91~116 (2008), Springer
23. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., "Argumentation in science education: an overview, In Argumentation in Science Education: Recent Developments and Future Directions", pp.3~28 (2008), Springer
24. Kuhn, D., "The Skills of Argument" (1991), Cambridge University Press
25. Layton, D., "InarticulateScience? Perspectives on the Public Understanding of Science and Some Implications for Science Education" (1993), Studies in Education
26. Lederman, N. G., "Introduction, In The Role of Moral Reasoning and Discourse on Socioscientific Issues in Science Education", pp.1~4 (2003), Kluwer Academic Press
27. Lemke, J. L., "Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values" (1990), Ablex
28. Levinson, R., "Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues", International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), pp.1201~1224 (2006)
29. Lincoln, Y. S., "Naturalistic Inquiry" (1985), Sage Publications
30. Mason, L., "Prediction of students’ argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding", Learning and Instruction, 16(5), pp.492~509 (2006)
31. Millar, R., "Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future" (1998), King's College London
32. Mortimer, E. F., "Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classroom" (2003), Open university Press
33. National Research Council, "A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas" (2011), The National Academies Press
34. Richmond, G., "Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), pp.839~858 (1996)
35. science literacy, In Handbook of Research on Science Education, "Scientific literacy", pp.2007, Roberts, D. A.
36. Report on Argumentation and Teacher Education in Europe, "S-TEAM (Science Teacher Education Adbanced Methods)", S-TEAM, 2010
37. Sadler, T., "Informal reasoning regarding socio scientific issues: A critical review of research", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), pp.513~536 (2004)
38. Sadler, T. D., "What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry", Research in Science Education, 37(4), pp.371~397 (2007)
39. Sadler, T. D., "Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality", International Journal of Science Education, 28, pp.1463~1488 (2006)
40. Sadler, T. D., "A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation", Science Education, 90, pp.986~1004 (2006)
41. Sadler, T. D., "The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas", Science Education, 88(1), pp.4~27 (2004)
42. Samarapungavan, A., "Children’s judgments in theory-choice tasks: Scientific rationality in childhood", Cognition, 45(1), pp.1~32 (1992)
43. Samra-Fredericks, D., "Conversation analysis, In Qualitative Methods and Analysis in Organisational Research" (1998), Sage
44. Scott, P., "Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A vygotskian analysis and review", Studies in Science Education, 32, pp.45~80 (1998)
45. Simon, S., "Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom", International Journal of Science Education, 27(14), pp.137~162 (2006)
46. Simonneaux, L., "Argumentation in socio-scientific contexts, In Argumentation in Science Education: Recent Developments and Future Directions" (2008), Springer
47. Suthers, D., "An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), pp.183~219 (2003)
48. Toulmin, S. E., "The Uses of Argument" (1958), University Press
49. Walton, D., "Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning" (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum
50. Walton, D., "Examination dialogue: an argumentation framework for critically questioning an expert opinion", Journal of Pragmatics, 38, pp.745~777 (2006)
51. Zeidler, D. L., "Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 74, pp.101~ (2009)
52. Zohar, A., "Higher Order Thinking in Science Classrooms: Students’ Learning and Teacher Professional Development" (2004), Kluwer Academic Press

관련 논문AI추천