갈등 상황에서 구성된 중학생들의 소집단 논변활동 유형
Small Group Argumentation Pattern of Middle School Students Constructed in The Conflict Context
0
조회
0
다운로드
12
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to explore the process of argument co-construction through small group interaction. We conducted a class which involved an argumentation activity for 7th grade students. We provided a question about Euglena to the participants, and they were asked to write their individual argument, then to construct a collective argument regarding the same question through small group argumentation. The result showed that the question about Euglena worked as a external conflict context and it led students to participate in the argumentation. The student's argumentations were categorized into two patterns : dialogic argumentation and authoritative argumentation. In dialogic argumentation, students developed internal conflict context based on the difference between their individual arguments, and they negotiated to resolve the difference. In this process, they applied broader concepts and elaborated related concepts, and as a result, the quality of collective argument was enhanced. In authoritative argumentation, the arguments of the student with perceived authority, such as content knowledge or a loud voice, or the argument of the majority,was selected as the collective argument without deep reasoning and justification. The characteristic of the task and the role of students influenced the argumentation pattern.
참고문헌 (37)
- 강석진, "과학사를 이용한 소집단 토론 수업이 학생들의 과학의 본성에 대한 이해에 미치는 영향", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(5), pp.996~1007 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 강석진, "소집단 토론 과정에서의 언어적 상호작용 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 20(3), pp.353~363 (2000)
- 강석진, "과학 개념 학습에서 협동적 소집단 토론의 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), pp.93~101 (2002)
- 곽경화, "과학적 논의과정 활동을 통한 학생들의 논의과정 변화 및 논의상황에 따른 논의과정 특성", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(4), pp.400~413 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 김희경, "학생의 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 과학탐구활동 모형의 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1216~1234 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- 박영신, "교실에서의 실질적 과학 탐구를 위한 과학적 논증 기회에 대한 이론적 고찰", 한국지구과학회지, 27(4), pp.401~415 (2006), 한국지구과학회
- 박지영, "사회 속 과학 쟁점에 대한 소집단 논변활동의 이해: 교육대학교 학생들의 의사소통 분위기를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2009
- 위수민, "학생 특성에 따른 소그룹 논증 수준 분석", 과학교육연구지, 33(1), pp.1~11 (2009), 과학교육연구소
- 이효녕, "학교과학교육에서의 논증활동 활용에 대한 교사들의 인식", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(6), pp.666~679 (2009), 한국과학교육학회
- 조현준, "초등과학 영재의 논증활동에서 사용된 증거의 수준 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 28(5), pp.495~505 (2008), 한국과학교육학회
- Bakhtin, M. M., "The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays" (1981), University of Texas Press
- Bennett, J., "Talking science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching", International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), pp.69~95 (2010)
- Chin, C., "Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), pp.883~908 (2010)
- Chinn, C. A., "Epistemologically authentic inquiry tasks", Science Education, 86(2), pp.175~218 (2002)
- Cunningham, C. M., "Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(5), pp.483~499 (1998)
- De Vries, E., "Computermediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), pp.63~103 (2002)
- Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in Classrooms", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
- Erduran, S., "Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research" (2008), Dordrecht
- Erduran, S., "The role of argumentation in developing scientific literacy, In Research and the Quality of Science Education" (2005), Dordrecht
- Guzetti, B. J., "Meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education to promote conceptual change in science", Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), pp.116~161 (1993)
- Hodson, D., "Is this really what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory, In Practical Work in School Science: Which way now" (1998), Routledge
- Hogan, K., "Sociocognitive roles in science group discourse", International Journal of Science Education, 21(8), pp.855~882 (1999)
- Hynd, C. R., "Preservice elementary school teachers' conceptual changes about projectile motion: Refutation text, demonstration, affective factors, and relevance", Science Education, 81(1), pp.1~27 (1997)
- Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., "‘Doing the lesson’ or ‘doing science’: argument in high school genetics", Science Education, 84(6), pp.757~792 (2000)
- Kuhn, D., "Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking", Science Education, 77(3), pp.319~337 (1993)
- Lemke, J. L., "Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values" (1990), Ablex
- Lotman, Y. M., "Text within a text", Soviet Psychology, 26(3), pp.32~51 (1988)
- McNeill, K. L., "Teachers' use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena", Science Education, 93(2), pp.233~268 (2009)
- Oliveria, A. W., "Interactive patterns and conceptual convergence during student collaborative in science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), pp.634~658 (2008)
- Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd Ed.)" (2002), Sage Publication
- Quinn, V., "Critical Thinking in Young Minds" (1997), David Fulton
- Richmond, G., "Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), pp.839~858 (1996)
- Scott, P. H., "Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms : A Vygotskian analysis and review", Studies in Science Education, 32(1), pp.45~80 (1998)
- Tolmie, A., "Gender and dialogue in secondary school physics", Gender and Education, 5(2), pp.191~209 (1993)
- Toulmin, S., "The Uses of Argument" (1958), Cambridge University Press
- Van Zee, E. H., "Reflective discourse : Developing shared understandings in a physics classrooms", International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), pp.209~228 (1997)
- Zohar, A., "Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), pp.35~62 (2002)