지구과학 관련 사회적 문제(socio-scientific issue)와 관련된 논증적 글쓰기를 통해 알아본 예비교사들의 논증구조 발달 분석
An Analysis on argumentation structure development of preservice teachers through argumentative writing on earth science related SSI
0
조회
0
다운로드
20
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze the degree of argumentation structure development and factors of development of preservice teachers through SSI related argumentative writings. The study was conducted with 16 preservice teachers that students taking elementary science education theory class in K university located in Chungbuk. The testees wrote six SSI related argumentative writings (once a week), and we examined the degree of argumentation structure development and the change in the recognition of SSI of the preservice teachers by comparing the writings before and after the experiments. The experimental results showed that argumentation structure of the preservice teachers’writings improved and argument level (argument capability) of them also increased as the number of writing was increased. Factors that affect the argumentation structure improvement are mainly argumentation structure education, a number of writings, feedbacks, and subjects related to SSI. In this aspect, the argumentative writing on SSI has the effect of developing scientific sophistication and enhancing the decision-making power of students, and it has positive impacts in science education.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the degree of argumentation structure development and factors of development of preservice teachers through SSI related argumentative writings. The study was conducted with 16 preservice teachers that students taking elementary science education theory class in K university located in Chungbuk. The testees wrote six SSI related argumentative writings (once a week), and we examined the degree of argumentation structure development and the change in the recognition of SSI of the preservice teachers by comparing the writings before and after the experiments. The experimental results showed that argumentation structure of the preservice teachers’writings improved and argument level (argument capability) of them also increased as the number of writing was increased. Factors that affect the argumentation structure improvement are mainly argumentation structure education, a number of writings, feedbacks, and subjects related to SSI. In this aspect, the argumentative writing on SSI has the effect of developing scientific sophistication and enhancing the decision-making power of students, and it has positive impacts in science education.
참고문헌 (20)
- Abi-El-Mona, I., "Argumentative discourse in a high school chemistry classroom", School Science and Mathematics, 106(8), pp.349~361 (2006)
- Bell, P., "Scientific arguments as learning artifacts : Designing for learning for the Web with KIE", International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), pp.797~817 (2000)
- Colaizzi, P. E., "Psychological research as the phenomenologist view it existential phenomenology" (1978), Oxford University press
- Flower, S. R., "Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students", International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), pp.279~296 (2009)
- Holliday, W. G., "The reading-science learning-writing connection : Breakthroughs, barriers, and promise", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), pp.877~893 (1994)
- Keys, C. W., "Revitalizing instruction in science genes : connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science", Science Education, 83, pp.115~130 (1999)
- Gragson, D. E., "Developing technical writing skills in the physical chemistry laboratory : A progressive approach employing peer review", Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), pp.62~55 (2010)
- 이현주, "과학과 관련된 윤리적·사회적 문제 도입 측면에서의 미국 주별 과학과 교육과정 및 중등 과학교사의 인식 탐색", 교육과정평가연구, 10(1), pp.189~209 (2007), 한국교육과정평가원
- Maloney, J., "Mapping children’s discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation", International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), pp.1817~1841 (2006)
- Ministry of Education and Science Technology, "Korean 2009 Revision Science Curriculum", Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, ~ (2009)
- National Research Council, "National Science Education Standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- Newton, p., "The plaace of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science", International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), pp.553~576 (1999)
- Ochsner, R., "Playing devil’s advocate:Evaluating the literature of the WAC", WID movement, 2004, pp.74(2), 117~140
- O’Donnell, A. M, "Cognitive perspectives on peer learning" (1998), Erlbaum
- Osborne, J., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.994~1020 (2004)
- Rivard, L. P., "The effect of talk and writing on learning science : An exploratory study", Science Education, 84, pp.566~593 (2000)
- Sadler, T. D., "Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, pp.112~138 (2005)
- 송윤미, "초등학교 교사들의 과학 글쓰기에 대한 인식 연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 31(5), pp.788~800 (2011), 한국과학교육학회
- 위수민, "원전 사고 관련 SSI에 대한 초등 예비교사들의 이해도와 교육 필요성에 대한 인식", 과학교육연구지, 37(2), pp.294~309 (2013), 과학교육연구소
- Zeidler, D. L., "Beyond STS : A research-based framework for sosioscientific issues education", Science Education, 89(3), pp.357~377 (2005)