본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

교과서와 자연사박물관의 진화에 관한 증거 기반 설명의 특성

Characteristics of Evidence-based Evolutionary Explanation in Textbooks and Natural History Museums

이선경|김희백|정주혜
한국생물교육학회 (The Korean Society of Biology Education)|2010.06|생물교육 (BIOLOGY EDUCATION)|제38권 제2호|pp. 254-269|DOI 10.15717/bioedu.2010.38.2.254

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

explanationevolutionary evidencesnatural history museumbiology textbook
주제분류교육학

초록

This paper aims to find implications for scientific inquiry and evolution teaching at school by examining the evolutionary evidences and explanations in the 9th-grade science textbooks and the Natural History Museum(NHM). Insufficient evolutionary evidences in textbooks make it difficult for students to reason natural selection and evolution from a common ancestor, and the major evolutionary conceptions were explained as piecemeal knowledge. In contrast, NHM displayed the sufficient and concrete evidences including cladograms or phylogenetic trees, explicit transitional features, synapomorphies, and examples of organisms' adaptation, which are used to explain evolutionary concepts in an integrated way. Also, NHM showed an argumentative structure including ‘questions cuing reasoning' and a causal explanation integrating various evidences.

Abstract

This paper aims to find implications for scientific inquiry and evolution teaching at school by examining the evolutionary evidences and explanations in the 9th-grade science textbooks and the Natural History Museum(NHM). Insufficient evolutionary evidences in textbooks make it difficult for students to reason natural selection and evolution from a common ancestor, and the major evolutionary conceptions were explained as piecemeal knowledge. In contrast, NHM displayed the sufficient and concrete evidences including cladograms or phylogenetic trees, explicit transitional features, synapomorphies, and examples of organisms' adaptation, which are used to explain evolutionary concepts in an integrated way. Also, NHM showed an argumentative structure including ‘questions cuing reasoning' and a causal explanation integrating various evidences.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. 김학현, "고등학교 생물 교과서에서의 진화내용분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 23(5), pp.470~483 (2003), 한국과학교육학회
  2. 송정남, "한국과 미국 자연사박물관 전시물의 특징 및 교육과정과의 연관성 분석", 석사, pp.2006
  3. 신영준, "국민공통기본교육과정 과학과 생명영역에서의 탐구 활동 연계성 분석", 한국생물교육학회지, 32(2), pp.135~141 (2004), 한국생물교육학회
  4. 이미숙, "진화 및 진화 수업에 대한 현직 교사 및 예비 교사들의 인식 조사", 한국생물교육학회지, 36(4), pp.587~599 (2008), 한국생물교육학회
  5. 이미숙, "남북한 고등학교 생물 교과서 진화 영역 내용 비교", 생물교육, 35(1), pp.134~149 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
  6. 이융남, "자연사박물관 고생물 분야의 전시기본 방향: 한국지질자원연구원 지질박물관의 예", 한국고생물학회지, 5, pp.13~30 (2002), special publication
  7. 이춘승, "중고등학생들의 진화에 관한 오개념 유형과 유형별 원인 분석", 생물교육, 35(4), pp.611~621 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
  8. 정주혜, "교과서의 증거를 바탕으로 구성한 고등학생들의 진화적 설명에서 나타나는 논변 구조와 진화 개념 유형", 한국생물교육학회지, 37(4), pp.526~542 (2009), 한국생물교육학회
  9. 정주혜, "미국 자연사박물관의 전시물에 반영된 학교 과학교육과정", 한국생물교육학회지, 33(2), pp.235~247 (2005), 한국생물교육학회
  10. 하민수, "진화 기작에 관한 설명의 질적 횡단 연구", 한국생물교육학회지, 35(1), pp.106~116 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
  11. Alozie, N. M., "An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project-based science", Science Education, 94(3), pp.395~427 (2010)
  12. Asma,S.T., "Stuffed Animals And Pickled Heads: The Culture and Evolution of Natural History Museums" (2001), Oxford University Press
  13. Bishop, B., "Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), pp.415~427 (1990)
  14. Catley,K.M., "Darwin's missing link - a novel paradigm for evolution education", Science Education, 90(5), pp.767~783 (2006)
  15. Catley, K. M., "Seeing the wood for the trees: An analysis of evolutionary diagrams in biology textbooks", National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual International Conference (2008)
  16. Dijk, E. M., "Teaching evolution with historical narratives", Evolution Education and Outreach, 2(3), pp.479~489 (2009)
  17. Driver, R., "Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms", Science Education, 84, pp.287~312 (2000)
  18. Duschl,R.A., "Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research" (2008), Springer Academic Publishers
  19. Duschl, R. A., "Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education", Studies in Science Education, 38, pp.39~72 (2002)
  20. Evans, E. M., "Conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors' understanding of evolution", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), pp.326~353 (2009)
  21. Farber,P., "Teaching evolution & the nature of science", The American Biology Teacher, 65(5), pp.347~354 (2003)
  22. Flick,L.B., "Cognitive scaffolding that fosters scientific inquiry in middle level science", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(2), pp.109~129 (2000)
  23. Gregory,T.R., "Understanding evolutionary trees", Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(2), pp.121~137 (2008)
  24. Jeffery, K. R., "A study of the presence of evolutionary protoconcepts in pre-high school textbooks", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), pp.507~518 (1994)
  25. Jeffery,K.R., "A study of the presence of evolutionary protoconcepts in pre-high school textbooks", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), pp.507~518 (1994)
  26. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., "Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics", Science Education, 84(6), pp.757~792 (2000)
  27. Kuhn,D., "Science argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking", Science Education, 77(3), pp.319~337 (1993)
  28. Lederman, N. G., "Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), pp.497~521 (2002)
  29. Mayer,E., "What evolution is" (2001), Basic Books
  30. McNeill, K., "Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), pp.153~191 (2006)
  31. Mead,L.S., "Transforming our thinking about transitional forms", Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(2), pp.310~314 (2009)
  32. National Research Council, "National Science Education Standards" (1996), National Academy of Science
  33. Nelson, C., "The nature of science as a foundation for teaching science : evolution as a case study, In Mccomas (ed.) The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies", pp.315~329 (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  34. Novick, L. R., "Understanding phylogenies in biology: The influence of a Gestalt perceptual principle", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, pp.197~223 (2007)
  35. Passmore, C., "A modeling approach to teaching evolutionary biology in high schools", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), pp.185~204 (2002)
  36. Rutledge, M. L., "High school biology teacher' knowledge structures, acceptance and teaching of evolution", The American Biology Teacher, 64(1), pp.21~28 (2002)
  37. Sandoval, W. A., "The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations", Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), pp.23~55 (2005)
  38. Sandoval, W. A., "Explanationdriven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry", Science Education, 88(3), pp.345~372 (2004)
  39. Stewart, J., "Considering the nature of scientific problems when designing science curricula", Science Education, 85(3), pp.207~222 (2001)
  40. Swarts, F. A., "Evolution in secondary school biology textbooks of the PRC, the USA and the Latter Stages of the USSR", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), pp.475~505 (1994)
  41. Zimmer,C., "진화: 시간의 강을 건너온 생명들 Evolution: The triumph of an idea" (2001), 세종서적

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)

초등학교 학생들의 과학 그림 그리기 선호 유형 조사박헌우pp. 209-216뇌 기반 과학 영재 교육에 대한 교사들의 인식 조사이길재, 권영식, 이미숙pp. 217-228진화에 대한 대학생들의 인식 조사강경리pp. 229-242ARCS 전략을 적용한 초등과학 수업이 과학적 태도, 자기 효능감 및 학업 성취도에 미치는 영향김진수, 배진호pp. 243-253중학생의 학생 상호 질문 생성 수업이 학업 성취도 및 수업 인식에 미치는 효과 - 중학교 3학년 생물 [세포분열] 단원을 중심으로 -여성희, 정은영pp. 270-284
원문 보기