창의적 문제해결과정 기반 생체모방 융합수업 모델 개발
Development of Biomimicry Convergence Instruction Model Based on Creative Problem Solving Process
1
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although various studies on convergence education have been pouring out in school education, there has not been shown a suitable convergence instruction model for biology education. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop an instruction model for biology class of convergence learning. Convergence learning should be based on problem solving process to enhance creative thinking. Hence, this study focused to review several literatures to extract convergence instruction factor from creative problem solving process. According to the literature reviews, biomimicry can be the most optimal method to learn either biological and bioengineering inquiry and creative design for problem solving. In addition, scientific and engineering inquiries, convergent design with creativity, and creative production were applied to students’ convergent problem solving in biomimicry class. Both divergent and convergent thinking constructing creative thinking could be consisted of students’ learning strategy in convergence class activity. As a result of this study, this study suggested the biomimicry convergence instruction model based on creative problem solving process. This instruction model was composed of three steps : scientific and engineering inquiry, convergent design with creativity, convergent creation of product. According to the process of convergence learning, researchers suggested the instruction model called as ‘S2D Model’ which is meaning a teaching model with the procedure from science to (creative) design. After application of the S2D Model into a biology class, and this study collected data to check the change of motivation level by course interest survey. In the application, the S2D model is not only to be suitable in biology class for teaching biology convergence, but also able to enhance science learning motivation of student.
Abstract
Although various studies on convergence education have been pouring out in school education, there has not been shown a suitable convergence instruction model for biology education. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop an instruction model for biology class of convergence learning. Convergence learning should be based on problem solving process to enhance creative thinking. Hence, this study focused to review several literatures to extract convergence instruction factor from creative problem solving process. According to the literature reviews, biomimicry can be the most optimal method to learn either biological and bioengineering inquiry and creative design for problem solving. In addition, scientific and engineering inquiries, convergent design with creativity, and creative production were applied to students’ convergent problem solving in biomimicry class. Both divergent and convergent thinking constructing creative thinking could be consisted of students’ learning strategy in convergence class activity. As a result of this study, this study suggested the biomimicry convergence instruction model based on creative problem solving process. This instruction model was composed of three steps : scientific and engineering inquiry, convergent design with creativity, convergent creation of product. According to the process of convergence learning, researchers suggested the instruction model called as ‘S2D Model’ which is meaning a teaching model with the procedure from science to (creative) design. After application of the S2D Model into a biology class, and this study collected data to check the change of motivation level by course interest survey. In the application, the S2D model is not only to be suitable in biology class for teaching biology convergence, but also able to enhance science learning motivation of student.
참고문헌 (50)
- 창의인재와 선진과학기술로 여는 미래 대한민국, "교육과학기술부", 교육과학기술부, ~ (2010)
- 교육과학기술부, "2009 개정교육과정에 따른 과학과 교육과정", 교육과학기술부 고시 제2011-361호, ~ (2011)
- 권난주, "융합 및 통합 과학교육 관련 국내 연구 동향 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(2), pp.265~278 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 김성원, "융합인재교육(STEAM)을 위한 이론적 모형의 제안", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(2), pp.388~401 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 김진수, "기술교육의 새로운 통합교육 방법인 STEM 교육의 탐색", 한국기술교육학회지, 7(3), pp.1~29 (2007), 한국기술교육학회
- 박혜원, "융합인재교육(STEAM)을 적용한 과학수업이 자기효능감, 흥미 및 과학 태도에 미치는 영향", 생물교육, 40(1), pp.132~146 (2012), 한국생물교육학회
- 백윤수, "우리나라 STEAM 교육의 방향", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(4), pp.149~171 (2011), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 변정호, "학습 패러다임 분석을 통한 과학 학습의 구성요소와 과정에 대한 고찰", 중등교육연구, 59(2), pp.415~441 (2011), 중등교육연구소
- 이일선, "두뇌 동기보상 시스템 기반 생명과학 학습동기 증진 학습모형 개발", 생물교육, 40(1), pp.109~120 (2012), 한국생물교육학회
- 이효녕, "통합 STEM 교육에 대한 중등 교사의 인식과 요구", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(1), pp.30~45 (2012), 한국과학교육학회
- 조혜원, "생물 모델 구성에서 생물 지식과 창의성의 상관관계", 생물교육, 40(1), pp.61~70 (2012), 한국생물교육학회
- Mark Sanders, "Integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Education: Contemporary Trends and Issues", 중등교육연구, 59(3), pp.729~762 (2011), 중등교육연구소
- Alexander, P. A., "Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns", Educational Psychology, 27, pp.33~51 (1992)
- Ashton-James, C. E., "Social cues for creativity: The impact of behavioral mimicry on convergent and divergent thinking", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, pp.1046~1040 (2009)
- Bahar, M., "The relationship between some psychological factors and their effect on the performance of grid questions and word association tests", Educational Psychology, 20, pp.349~364 (2000)
- Barak, M., "Teaching methods for inventive problem-solving in junior high school", Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, pp.19~29 (2007)
- Bar-Cohen, Y., "Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies" (2006), Taylor & Francis
- Benyus, J., "Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature" (1997), William Morrow
- Boden, M. A., "The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms" (2004), Basic Books
- Brostow, W., "Instruction in materials science and engineering: modern technology and the new role of the teacher", Materials Science and Engineering, A302, pp.181~185 (2001)
- Bybee, R. W., "Advancing STEM education: A2020 vision", Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), pp.30~35 (2010)
- Cropley, A. J., "In praise of convergent thinking", Creativity Research Journal, 18, pp.391~404 (2006)
- Guilford, J. P., "Creativity", American Psychologist, 5, pp.444~454 (1959)
- Guilford, J. P., "The Nature of Human Intelligence" (1967), McGraw-Hill
- Keller, J. M., "Motivational Design for Learning and Performance: The ARCS model approach" (2009), Springer
- Lee, D., "Biomimicry: Inventions Inspired by Nature" (2011), Kid Can Press
- Massachusetts Department of Higher Education, "Increasing Student interest in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math(STEM): Massachusetts STEM Pipeline Fund Programs Using Promising Practices" (2011), Boston
- Matthews, C. M., "Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Education: Status and Issues", Congressional Research Service Report for Congress (2007)
- Mayer, R. E., "Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition(2nd ed.)" (1992), W. H. Freeman and Co.
- Miller, L. M., "Learning and motivational impacts of a multimedia science game", Computers & Education, 57, pp.1425~1433 (2011)
- Mumford, M. D., "Process analytic of creative capacities", Creatively Research Journal, 4, pp.91~122 (1991)
- National Research Council, "Inquiry and the national Science Education Standards: A Guide for TeaChing and Learning" (2000), National Academy Press
- Nemeth, C. J., "Creative collaborations from afar: The benefits of independent of correct solutions", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, pp.48~58 (2005)
- Newell, A., "Human Problem Solving" (1972), Prentice-Hall
- Newell, A., "The processes of creative thinking, In Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking" (1962), Atherton Press
- Ormrod, J. E., "Human Learning (3rd ed.)" (1999), Prentice- Hall Inc
- Polya, G., "Patterns of Plausible Inference" (1954), Princeton University Press
- Porter, A. L., "A system model of innovation process in university STEM education", Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), pp.13~24 (2006)
- Razoumnikova, O. M., "Functional organization of different brain areas during convergent and divergent thinking: an EEG investigation", Cognitive Brain Research, 10, pp.11~18 (2000)
- Robertson, I., "Problem Solving" (2001), Psychology Press
- Sargent, R. W. H., "Engineering science-or scientific engineering: Danckwerts memorial lecture", Chemical Engineering Science, 57, pp.1075~1077 (2002)
- Sternberg, R. J., "The domain generality versus specificity debate: How should it be posed, In Faces of the muse: How People Think, Work and Act Creatively in Diverse Domains" (2005), Erlbaum
- Sternberg, R. J., "Investing in creativity", American Psychologist, 51(7), pp.677~688 (1996)
- Sternberg, R. J., "The concept of creativity: Prospects and Paradigms, In Handbook of Creativity" (1999), Cambridge University Press
- Sternberg, R., "Intelligence and creativity, In Handbook of Intelligence" (2000), Cambridge University Press
- Wallas, G., "The Art of Thought" (1926), Harcourt Brace
- Wang, Y., "On the cognitive process of human problem solving", Cognitive Systems research, 11, pp.81~92 (2010)
- Wang, Y., "A layered reference model of the brain(LRMB)", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (C), 36(2), pp.124~133 (2006)
- Watters, J. J., "Developing motivation to teach elementary science: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11(4), pp.301~321 (2000)
- Wilson, L. B., "Comparative Programming Language. Wokingham" (1988), Addison-Wesley Publishing Co