본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

명시적 탐구학습 프로그램이 지적장애학생의 분류 능력에 미치는 효과 - sLORETA를 이용한 뇌파 분석 연구 -

The Effects of an Explicit Inquiry Learning Model for Improving Classification Ability of Students with Intellectual Disability - A Brain Wave Study using sLORETA -

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study was to develop an explicit inquiry learning model for middle school students with intellectual disability and evaluate its effects on improvements of students’ classification ability through the application of the model. For this purpose, three researches were conducted; (a) development of explicit inquiry learning model based on the critical review of the literature and previous researches about explicit learning models and teaching strategy for student with an intellectual disability; (b) development of a classification ability assessment framework for classification ability assessment; (c) analysis of its effectiveness using the framework. As a result, an explicit inquiry learning model was developed which consisted of five steps; (a) introduction, (b) guided practice at low level, (c) guided practice at high-level, (d) independent practice, and (e) application. With these model and learning contents, 15 class hours of programs were developed. Four middle school students with disabilities participated in the lessons. The change of students’ classification abilities was analyzed by classification function assessment with the paper test and sLORETA analysis. In the posttest, the students with intellectual disability generated more classification criteria in the fluency, the elaboration, and the level of thinking process compare within the pretest. In case of sLORETA analysis, the alpha band (8.0~12.9 Hz) was increased in the precentral gyrus of the frontal lobe, postcentral gyrus of the parietal lobe. So, alpha band was shown the increased in the superior temporal gyrus and transverse temporal gyrus of the temporal lobe. This result shows that the explicit inquiry learning model is effective to improve the classification ability of student with intellectual disability. In addition, the study raises the need for further research, such as pluralism classification and abductive strategy.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an explicit inquiry learning model for middle school students with intellectual disability and evaluate its effects on improvements of students’ classification ability through the application of the model. For this purpose, three researches were conducted; (a) development of explicit inquiry learning model based on the critical review of the literature and previous researches about explicit learning models and teaching strategy for student with an intellectual disability; (b) development of a classification ability assessment framework for classification ability assessment; (c) analysis of its effectiveness using the framework. As a result, an explicit inquiry learning model was developed which consisted of five steps; (a) introduction, (b) guided practice at low level, (c) guided practice at high-level, (d) independent practice, and (e) application. With these model and learning contents, 15 class hours of programs were developed. Four middle school students with disabilities participated in the lessons. The change of students’ classification abilities was analyzed by classification function assessment with the paper test and sLORETA analysis. In the posttest, the students with intellectual disability generated more classification criteria in the fluency, the elaboration, and the level of thinking process compare within the pretest. In case of sLORETA analysis, the alpha band (8.0~12.9 Hz) was increased in the precentral gyrus of the frontal lobe, postcentral gyrus of the parietal lobe. So, alpha band was shown the increased in the superior temporal gyrus and transverse temporal gyrus of the temporal lobe. This result shows that the explicit inquiry learning model is effective to improve the classification ability of student with intellectual disability. In addition, the study raises the need for further research, such as pluralism classification and abductive strategy.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Cartin, A. A., "Activities for Teaching Science as Inquiry" (2005), Merill
  2. 장진아, "초등학생을 위한 자유 탐구 프로그램 개발 및 적용: 학생의 과학 탐구 기능 특성 및 지속적 피드백을 중심으로", 초등과학교육, 29(2), pp.207~218 (2010), 한국초등과학교육학회
  3. Chiappetta, E. L., "Science Instruction in the Middle and Secondary School" (2010), Allyn & bacon
  4. Compumedics, "Profusion EEG User Guide" (2000), Compumedics Limited
  5. 최현동, "초등학생 분류능력 발달의 경향성", 초등과학교육, 24(3), pp.281~291 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
  6. 최미영, "지적장애 학생의 기초 탐구 기능 평가", 특수교육저널:이론과 실천, 15(4), pp.49~76 (2014), 한국특수교육문제연구소
  7. Denys, K., "The processing of visual shape in the cerebral cortex of human and nonhuman primates : A functional magnetic resonance imaging study", Journal of Neuroscience, 24(10), pp.2551~2565 (2004)
  8. Du Boisgueheneuc, F., "Functions of the left superior frontal gyrus in humans : A lesion study", Brain, 129, pp.3315~3328 (2006)
  9. Fairclough, S. H., "The influence of task demand and learning on the psychophysiological response", International Journal of Psychophysiology, 56, pp.171~184 (2005)
  10. Goel, V., "Anatomical segregation of component processes in and inductive inference task", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, pp.110~119 (2000)
  11. Grossen, B., "Instructional design considerations for teaching science to diverse learners", Effective School Practices, 71, pp.136~142 (1993)
  12. Haier, R. J., "Structural brain variation and general intelligence", NeuroImage, 23(1), pp.425~433 (2004)
  13. Haist, F., "Linking sight and sound : fMRI evidence of primary auditory cortex activation during visual word recognition", Brain and Language, 76, pp.340~350 (2001)
  14. Hester, R., "Avoiding andther mistake : Error and posterior neural activity associated with adaptive posterior behavior change", Cognitive Affective Behavior Neuroscience, 7(4), pp.317~326 (2007)
  15. 홍석준, "중학생의 기초 탐구 기능 이해를 위한 명시적 교수∙학습 전략의 개발 및 적용 사례 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 31(4), pp.641~662 (2011), 한국과학교육학회
  16. Kellenbach, M. L., "A pet study of visual and semantic knowledge about objects", Cortex, 41, pp.121~132 (2005)
  17. Keri, S., "The cognitive neuroscience of category learning", Brain Research Reviews, 43, pp.85~109 (2003)
  18. Kim. Y. J., "Changes of the prefrontal EEG(Electroencephalogram)activities according to the repetition of audio-visual learning", Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 31(3), pp.516~528 (2001)
  19. 김용규, "분류 과제 수행 시 지적장애 중학생과 일반 중학생의 세타파와 알파파 상대파워스펙트럼 활성 차이 비교 분석", 특수교육저널:이론과 실천, 16(2), pp.551~572 (2015), 한국특수교육문제연구소
  20. Klimesch, W., "Upper alpha ERD and absolute power : Their meaning for memory performance", Progress in Brain Research, 259, pp.151~165 (2006)
  21. 권석원, "Differences in Neural Current Sources of Science Gifted and Normal Children in Creative Reasoning", 초등과학교육, 34(1), pp.131~141 (2015), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  22. Kwon, Y. J., "An explorative analysis of hypothesis-generation by pre-service science teachers", Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 20(1), pp.29~42 (2000)
  23. 이혜정, "생명 현상의 공통성 지식 생성과 적용에서 나타나는 예비 교사의 뇌 활성화 양상 : fMRI 연구", 생물교육, 36(3), pp.251~265 (2008), 한국생물교육학회
  24. 이혜원, "초등학생의 과학탐구기능 향상을 위한 명시적이고 반성적인 교수․학습전략 개발 및 적용 -관찰과 분류를 중심으로-", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(1), pp.95~112 (2012), 한국과학교육학회
  25. Lloyd, J. W., "Some methods are more effective than others", Intervention in School and Clinics, 33(4), pp.195~200 (1998)
  26. Mayr. E., "This is Biology : The Science of the Living World" (1997), The belknap press of Harvard University press
  27. Meichtry, Y. J., "Influencing student understanding of the nature of science : Data from a case of curriculum development", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp.389~407 (1992)
  28. Ministry of Education., "Special Education Curriculum Supplement Ⅱ[특수교육 교육과정 별책 2. Ministry of Education Announcement No. 2011-501", 교육과학기술부고시 제 2011-501호, ~ (2011)
  29. 남경욱, "정신지체아동 대상 중재연구 문헌 분석: 1990년 이후 국내 학술지 논문을 중심으로", 지적장애연구, 9(1), pp.43~70 (2007), 한국지적장애교육학회
  30. National Research Councel., "Inquiry and The National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning" (2000), National Academy Press
  31. 박창선, "관찰 자료의 종류와 제시 방법에 따른 초등학생들의 생물 관찰 유형 분석", 생물교육, 36(4), pp.566~576 (2008), 한국생물교육학회
  32. Park, J. M., "Learning for art considering the characteristics of students with intellectual disabilities on common middle school students' perceptions of and attitudes toward disabilities", Master, pp.2014
  33. Park, S. M., "Functional differences between working memory and short-term memory, and their relationto intelligence:SEM and fMRI approach", Doctor, pp.2010
  34. Pascual-Marqui, R. D., "Functional imaging with low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) : A review", Methods & Findings in Experimental & Clinical Pharmacology, 24(suppl C), pp.91~95 (2002)
  35. Pearson, P. D., "Explicit comprehension instruction : A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction", Elementary School Journal, 88, pp.151~165 (1987)
  36. Rosenshine, B. V, "The International Encyclopedia of Teaching and Teacher Education", pp.143~149 (1995), Cambridre University Press
  37. Rosenshine, B. V., "Handbook on Research on Teaching" (1986), Macmillan
  38. Rosenshine, B. V., "Issues in Education Students with Disabilities", pp.197~221 (1997), Erlbaum
  39. Schultz, J., "Activation of the human superior temporal gyrus during observation of goal attribution by intentional objects", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(10), pp.1695~1705 (2004)
  40. Shin, Y. H., (1993), Academe book
  41. Talati, A., "Functional specialization within the medial frontal gyrus for perceptual Go", No-Go decisions based on"What", "When", and"Where"related information : An fMRI study, 2005, pp.17(7), 981~993

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)