본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

멘델 유전이론 발달과정에 나타난 과학자의 탐구과정에 대한 예비교사의 이해 분석

Analysis of Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Inquiry Process performed by Scientists during the Development of Mendelian Genetic Theory

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study was to analyze the developmental process of genetic theory and reasoning strategies used by Mendel and identify the pre-service teachers’ understanding of inquiry process performed by the scientist. The developmental stages and strategies of Mendelian genetic theory were analyzed using Darden’s analyzing framework. Based on the primary analysis, Darden’s analyzing framework was modified and then the developmental process of genetic theory and reasoning strategies ware re-analyzed to produce the final analyzing framework. Using this final analyzing framework, 79 pre-service teachers’ understanding of inquiry process performed by Mendel was analyzed. Their responses to questionnaire were classified as five different types such as proper response, mechanical response, mixed response, wrong answer, and non-response. The results of this study were as follows. The analyzing framework was reconstructed to review the inquiry processes and strategies used by Mendel in genetic theory development. This framework has some features; 1) it includes the problem finding strategy, 2) it emphasize the role of the theory assessment, and 3) it includes some detailed strategies for covering the molecular biology. Therefore the reconstructed analyzing framework explains more details of the stages and strategies of development of genetic theory than Darden’s framework. The preservice teachers have a high level of understanding of the genetics knowledge. However, they had a lower level of understanding about the inquiry process carried out by the scientists. Especially they had difficulties to answer to the questions that demand an explanation of the essential reasoning strategies in inquiry like Mendel’s theory assessment strategy. This difficulties were also observed in the questions that asked to think like scientist about problem. These findings suggest that teachers need to learn the process of knowledge development and reasoning strategies used by scientists in Mendelian genetics. Teachers can construct genetics lectures using the analyzing framework proposed in this study, and evaluate the student’s understanding of genetic concepts for providing an adequate learning environment.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the developmental process of genetic theory and reasoning strategies used by Mendel and identify the pre-service teachers’ understanding of inquiry process performed by the scientist. The developmental stages and strategies of Mendelian genetic theory were analyzed using Darden’s analyzing framework. Based on the primary analysis, Darden’s analyzing framework was modified and then the developmental process of genetic theory and reasoning strategies ware re-analyzed to produce the final analyzing framework. Using this final analyzing framework, 79 pre-service teachers’ understanding of inquiry process performed by Mendel was analyzed. Their responses to questionnaire were classified as five different types such as proper response, mechanical response, mixed response, wrong answer, and non-response. The results of this study were as follows. The analyzing framework was reconstructed to review the inquiry processes and strategies used by Mendel in genetic theory development. This framework has some features; 1) it includes the problem finding strategy, 2) it emphasize the role of the theory assessment, and 3) it includes some detailed strategies for covering the molecular biology. Therefore the reconstructed analyzing framework explains more details of the stages and strategies of development of genetic theory than Darden’s framework. The preservice teachers have a high level of understanding of the genetics knowledge. However, they had a lower level of understanding about the inquiry process carried out by the scientists. Especially they had difficulties to answer to the questions that demand an explanation of the essential reasoning strategies in inquiry like Mendel’s theory assessment strategy. This difficulties were also observed in the questions that asked to think like scientist about problem. These findings suggest that teachers need to learn the process of knowledge development and reasoning strategies used by scientists in Mendelian genetics. Teachers can construct genetics lectures using the analyzing framework proposed in this study, and evaluate the student’s understanding of genetic concepts for providing an adequate learning environment.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 김명희, "과학자의 과학적 추론 과정이 가시화된 유전 영역 과학 영재 교수-학습 프로그램의 개발 및 적용", 생물교육, 39(1), pp.31~45 (2011), 한국생물교육학회
  2. 김은희, "과학사 개념틀에 근거한 교육 과정 및 교과서에 나타난 유전 개념 분석", 생물교육, 37(3), pp.403~417 (2009), 한국생물교육학회
  3. 동효관, "과학영재 특성에 기초한 수업 프로그램이 유전개념 변화와 창의력에 미치는 효과", 박사, 생물교육, pp.2002
  4. 양재섭, "멘델유전학에서 생명공학시대까지 생명관의 변천", 한국과학사학회지, 27(1), pp.87~108 (2005), 한국과학사학회
  5. 이미숙, "과학사에 근거한 학생들의 진화 개념 변화 분석", 박사, 생물교육, pp.2004
  6. 이안나, "동물 행동학자의 연구 활동에서 나타나는 연구 단계, 사고 과정, 행동 양식 및 생성 지식에 관한 연구", 생물교육, 35(3), pp.361~373 (2007), 한국생물교육학회
  7. 이혜정, "생물학자의 지식 생성 과정에 기반한 확장 귀추 모형 개발", 생물교육, 37(3), pp.352~362 (2009), 한국생물교육학회
  8. 장대익, "쿤 & 포퍼 : 과학에는 뭔가 특별한 것이 있다" (2008), 김영사
  9. 정아름, "유전 영역의 지식 발달 과정에서 과학자가 수행한 탐구에 대한 예비교사의 이해", 석사, pp.2016
  10. Bahar, M., "Revisiting learning difficulties in biology", Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), pp.84~86 (1999)
  11. Carlson, E. A., "Mendel's Legacy : The Origin of Classical Genetics" (2004), Cold Spring harbor Laboratory Press
  12. Collins, A., "The knowledge structure of mendelian genetics", The American Biology Teacher, 51(3), pp.143~149 (1989)
  13. Corbin, J., "Grounded theory research : Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria", Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), pp.3~21 (1990)
  14. Darden, L., "Theory Change in Science : Strategies from Mendelian Genetics" (1991), Oxford University Press
  15. Darden, L., "Reasoning in Biological Discoveries : Essay on Mechanism, Interfield Relations, and Anomaly Resolution" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  16. Dillon, J. T., "Problem finding and solving", The Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(2), pp.97~111 (1982)
  17. Edward, E., "유전학의 탄생과 멘델" (2002), 바다출판사
  18. Everson, T., "The Gene : A Historical Perspective" (2007), Greenwood Press
  19. Getzels, J. W., "Problem finding : A theoretical note", Cognitive Science, 3(2), pp.167~172 (1979)
  20. Getzels, J. W., "New Directions for Methodology of Social and Behavioral Science: Question framing and Response Consistency", pp.37~49 (1982), Jossey-Bass
  21. Hoffmeyer, J., "기호학과 생물학의 만남: 생명기호학 서론.", 기호학 연구, 4, pp.339~361 (1998)
  22. Magner, L. N., "A History of the Life Sciences" (2002), Marcel Dekker, Inc
  23. Marbach-Ad, G., "Students’ cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena", Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), pp.200~205 (2000)
  24. Matthews, M. R, "과학교육 : 과학사와 과학철학의 역할" (2014), 북스힐
  25. Pichot, A, "유전자 개념의 역사" (2010), 나남
  26. Stewart, J. H., "Difficulties experienced by high school students when learning basic mendelian genetics", The American Biology Teacher, 44(2), pp.80~89 (1982)
  27. Wandersee, J. H., "Can the history of science help science educators anticipate student’s misconception", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(7), pp.581~597 (1985)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)