본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

규칙기반 질서와 한국의 인도-태평양 전략

The Rule-based Order and Korea's Indo-Pacific Strategy

이숙연
한국국방연구원 (Korea Institute for Defense Analyses)|2023.04|국방정책연구 (The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies)|제39권 제1호|pp. 39-73|DOI 10.22883/jdps.2023.39.1.002

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

UNCLOS유엔해양법협약인도-태평양 전략Indo-Pacific strategy안보협력security cooperation규칙기반 질서rule-based order

초록

한국은 2022년 인도-태평양 전략을 발표하고 규칙과 규범에 기반한 질서 구축을 위해 합당한 역할을 다할 것을 밝혔다. 이에 본 연구는 이론적 논의로 규칙기반 질서의 의미가 무엇이며 이를 둘러싼 개념적 논쟁들에는 어떠한 것들이 있는지 검토한 후, 규칙기반 질서를 약화시키는 근본적 요인들을 제시한다. 이러한 논의를 바탕으로 인태 전략을 추진하는 데 있어 한국이 직면한 도전과제를 살펴보고, 이를 극복하고 규칙기반 질서 확립에 기여하기 위해 어떠한 방향성을 견지할 것인지를 동 전략서의 원칙인 ‘포용, 호혜, 신뢰’에 기반하여 제언한다.

Abstract

In December of 2022, South Korea unveiled its Indo-Pacific strategy, declaring its intention to fulfill the responsibilities and play a pivotal role in the establishment of a rule-based Indo-Pacific regional order. This study aims to examine the meaning of “rule-based order” as mentioned in various strategic documents and government statements, and explore the conceptual debates surrounding it. Furthermore, this research identifies “mutually exclusive order competition, state-centered interpretation and application of the rule, and selective compliance with international law” as the factors that undermine the rule-based order. Finally, based on these findings, this paper discusses the challenges that South Korea faces in implementing its Indo-Pacific strategy, and suggests a direction for the security sector to help establish a regional, rule-based order.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. 자유･평화･번영의 인도-태평양 전략, "대한민국 정부", 대한민국 정부, ~ (2022)
  2. 이재준, "중국 군함, 가고시마 주변 일본 영해 침입... ‘4월 이래 6번째", 뉴시스, ~ (2022)
  3. Abeyagoonasekera, A, "China in Sri Lanka and Solomon Islands", The Institute for Security and Development Policy, ~ (2022)
  4. Acharya, Amitav., "Power Shift or Paradigm Shift? China’s Rise and Asia’s Emerging Security Order", International Studies Quarterly, 58(1), pp.158~173 (2014)
  5. "Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission" (2015)[URL]
  6. Bisley, N., "Australia and the Rules Based Order in Asia", Asian Survey, 58(2), pp.302~319 (2018)
  7. Brands, Hal, "China’s Global Influence Operation Goes Way beyond the WHO", Japan Times, ~ (2020)
  8. Burke-White, William W., "Power Shifts in International Law: Structural Realignment and Substantive Pluralism", Faculty Scholarship at Penn Carely Law, 599 (2017)
  9. Byrne, Caitlin., "Securing the ‘Rules-based Order’ in the Indo-Pacific", Security Challenges, 16(3), pp.10~15 (2020)
  10. "Chinese Communist Party is Attempting to Undermine Democratic Traditions Across Continents: Study" (2019)[URL]
  11. "Seoul Unveils Indo-Pacific Strategy; Experts Say Group Confrontation Is Against South Korea’s Interests" (2022)[URL]
  12. "2017 Foreign Policy White Paper" (2017)[URL]
  13. "Guidelines for Navigation and Overflight in the Exclusive Economic Zone" (2005)[URL]
  14. Elizabeth, E., "Xi Jinping's New World Order: Can China Remake the International System?", Foreign Affairs, 101(1), pp.52~67 (2022)
  15. Ellen, N., "China Secretly Building Naval Facility in Cambodia, Western Officials Say", Washington Post, ~ (2022)
  16. Government of India., "The Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and Other Maritime Zones Act, 1976", ~ (1976)
  17. Ikenberry, G. John., "Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order" (2011), Princeton University Press
  18. Ikenberry, G. John., "The Future of Liberal World Order", Japanese Journal of Political Science, 16(3), pp.450~455 (2015)
  19. "Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Advisory Opinion" (2019)[URL]
  20. Jeffrey, O., "Advancing a Rules-based Maritime Order in the Indo-Pacific", Pacific Forum, 21, pp.1~3 (2021)
  21. "Equilibrium & Fragmentation in the International Rule of Law: The Rising Chinese Geolegal Order (KFG Working Paper no. 21)" (2018)[URL]
  22. "The World America Made―and Trump Wants to Unmake" (2018)[URL]
  23. "What (and Whose) Rules Based Order (RBO)?" (2021)[URL]
  24. Kissinger, Henry, "Diplomacy" (1994), Touchstone
  25. "India, U.S. Not On Same Page On Rules-Based Order" (2021)[URL]
  26. "Why the ‘China Model’ Isn’t Going Away" (2013)[URL]
  27. Mearsheimer, John J., "Realism Reader", pp.464~467 (2014), Routledge
  28. "India Protests U.S. Navy’s Transit through Its Exclusive Economic Zone" (2021)[URL]
  29. "Under the Sea: New Colored 50p Coin Series Features Ocean Wildlife" (2021)[URL]
  30. "Will the Liberal Order Survive? History of an Idea" (2017)[URL]
  31. O’Mahoney, Joseph., "Rule Tensions and the Dynamics of Institutional Change:From ‘To the Victor Go the Spoils’ to the Stimson Doctrine", European Journal of International Relations, 20(3), pp.834~857 (2014)
  32. "US Navy Ship Violates Indian Law as It Sails through Exclusive Zone in ‘Messaging to China.’" (2021)[URL]
  33. "China’s Xi Proposes Global Security Initiative" (2022)[URL]
  34. Fragile and Fracturing or Evolving and Adaptive: Prospects for the Rules-Based Global Order, "Raymond, Greg", Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, ANU, ~, pp.Centre of Gravity Series no. 34 (2017)
  35. Rusli, Mohd Hazmi Mohd., "The Legality of Passage of Nuclear-Powered Submarines through SLOCs in the ASEAN Region: Are Malaysia and Indonesia in CATCH-22?", Paper presented at 2022 KIAS-BUFS International Conference, online conference via zoom (2022)
  36. "Britain Holds On to a Colony in Africa, With America’s Help" (2021)[URL]
  37. "But What Does Rules-Based Order Mean?" (2020)[URL]
  38. A Rules-Based Order for the Asia-Pacific: Identifying Opportunities for Australia-Japan Cooperation, Strengthening Rules-Based Order in the Asia-Pacific, "Scott, Shirley V.", Australian Strategic Policy Institute, ~ (2014)
  39. The State of Southeast Asia: 2023 Survey Report, "Seah, S.", ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, ~ (2023)
  40. "Collaboration Paradigm to Guide RI’s ASEAN Chairmanship: Marsudi" (2022)[URL]
  41. "The Escalating South China Sea Dispute―Lessons for India" (2016)[URL]
  42. Steinberg, Richard H., "In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT", WTO, 2002, pp.56(2), 339~374
  43. "Rules-based Order v. International Law?" (2019)[URL]
  44. Thakur, R, "Presence of UN Makes Exercise of Power More Effective: The Body Is a Symbol of Global Governance", The Australian, ~ (2012)
  45. "Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965" (2019)[URL]
  46. "World Map" (2020)[URL]
  47. "Fact Sheet: 2022 National Defense Strategy" (2022)[URL]
  48. Vylegzhanin, Alexander N., "The Term ‘Rules-based International Order’in International Legal Discourses", Moscow Journal of International Law, 2, pp.35~60 (2021)
  49. "China Wants a ‘Rules-Based International Order,’ Too" (2021)[URL]
  50. "National Security Strategy" (2022)[URL]
  51. "Statement by National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on the Republic of Korea’s Indo-Pacific Strategy" (2022)[URL]
  52. "Indo-Pacific Strategy of the United States" (2022)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

인도태평양 시대 한국의 ‘신남방정책’과 새로운 지역주의 전략의 모색최영종사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소 · 동북아연구2019 · 제34권 제1호미국의 인도·태평양 전략과 우리의 대응방안 - 트럼프·바이든 행정부의 인도·태평양 전략을 중심으로 -길병옥, 정천환미래군사학회 · 한국군사학논총2024 · 제13권 제4호트럼프 행정부의 인도-태평양 전략과 한국에 대한 함의김주리한국국방연구원 · 국방정책연구2020 · 제35권 제4호중국의 해양팽창정책에 따른 인·태지역 해양안보동학 특징 분석이지용세종연구소 · 국가전략2020 · 제26권 제4호동아시아 지역질서에서 CPTPP의 동향과 대응황기식한국세계지역학회 · 세계지역연구논총2022 · 제40권 제2호바이든 행정부의 인도태평양 전략: 전략의 성격과 성패의 관건김재천신아시아연구소 · 신아세아2022 · 제29권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)

한국 방산 수출의 지속적 증대 방안: 우크라이나 전쟁의 시사점과 선진 방산 전략을 위한 제언강은호pp. 7-38러시아-우크라이나 전쟁: 공중우세의 재고찰김홍석pp. 75-114민주적 대통령제와 국방안보의 딜레마: 국내정치적 요인과 국방비 지출 상관관계를 중심으로노경현pp. 115-144독일연방군의 재무장 과정과 전망: 러시아로부터의 군사적 위협에 대한 나토 차원의 대응을 중심으로신홍중pp. 145-178인지전 개념과 한국 국방에 대한 함의: 러시아-우크라이나 전쟁을 중심으로강신욱pp. 179-212
원문 보기