남북한 초등 생명과학 내용 및 북한 소학교 3, 5학년 생명과학 단원 분석
An Analysis of South and North Korea Elementary Life Science Content and North Korea Primary School 3rd, 5th Grade Life Science Units
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze the contents of elementary life science in South and North Korea and the life science units in the 3rd and 5th grades of primary schools in North Korea. The subject of life science education contents are the North Korea's 2013 1st universal 12-year curriculum and South Korea 2015 revised science curriculum. Life science units of the 3rd and 5th grade of North Korea primary schools compared them with the 2015 revised science textbook in South Korea. The results of the study are as follows. First, the contents of elementary life science education in the two Koreas differed in the scope and level of content by grade. Second, in the same elementary life science field, North Korea has more pages than South Korea, but South Korea has more average syllables than North Korea. Third, the number and type of illustrations differed between the two Koreas depending on the field of life science. Fourth, in life science, both South and North Korea were highly dependent on photographic illustrations. In addition, North Korea often used decorative and exemplary functions rather than explanatory and supplementary functions. Fifth, the number of exploration activities between the two Koreas was similar, and the level of exploration activities between the two Koreas was different depending on the field or content of life science. Sixth, the types of inquiry activities were different depending on the educational content of life science, and both the two Koreas were applying various forms of inquiry activities to teaching and learning activities.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the contents of elementary life science in South and North Korea and the life science units in the 3rd and 5th grades of primary schools in North Korea. The subject of life science education contents are the North Korea's 2013 1st universal 12-year curriculum and South Korea 2015 revised science curriculum. Life science units of the 3rd and 5th grade of North Korea primary schools compared them with the 2015 revised science textbook in South Korea. The results of the study are as follows. First, the contents of elementary life science education in the two Koreas differed in the scope and level of content by grade. Second, in the same elementary life science field, North Korea has more pages than South Korea, but South Korea has more average syllables than North Korea. Third, the number and type of illustrations differed between the two Koreas depending on the field of life science. Fourth, in life science, both South and North Korea were highly dependent on photographic illustrations. In addition, North Korea often used decorative and exemplary functions rather than explanatory and supplementary functions. Fifth, the number of exploration activities between the two Koreas was similar, and the level of exploration activities between the two Koreas was different depending on the field or content of life science. Sixth, the types of inquiry activities were different depending on the educational content of life science, and both the two Koreas were applying various forms of inquiry activities to teaching and learning activities.
참고문헌 (33)
- First General 12-Year Compulsory Education Act, "BOE", BOE, ~ (2013)
- Choi, D. H., "A comparative study on elementary school science curriculum and textbooks between South and North Korea", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 18(1), pp.43~60 (1998)
- Herron, M. D., "The nature of scientific inquiry", School Science Review, 79, pp.171~212 (1971)
- 정세종, "북한 소학교와 초급중학교 과학과 교사용 지도서의 교수내용지식(PCK) 요소 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 40(4), pp.415~427 (2020), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 진정, "한·중 고급 한국어 교재의 양적 텍스트 복잡도 비교 분석 연구", 국어교육학연구, 54(1), pp.185~212 (2019), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- Jo S. O., "Primary School Nature textboot 3" (2014), Education Book Publishing Company
- Jo S. O., "Primary School Nature textboot 5" (2016), Education Book Publishing Company
- A study on the development direction of the North and South Korea integrated curriculum through comparison of curriculum and textbooks in South and North Korea: Focused on Korean language, mathematics, English, science, "Jo, J. A.", MOE, 173~216 (2016)
- A study on interdisciplinary comparison and integration of North and South Korea, "Kim J. W.", KEDI, 1~406, pp.RR2015-12 (2015)
- 김진숙, "남북한의 최근 개정 교육과정 총론 비교", 교육과정연구, 34(2), pp.47~67 (2016), 한국교육과정학회
- Re-education plan for teachers in North and South Korea for the integration of education in South and North Korea, "Kim, J. W", KEDI, 1~243, pp.OR 2016-03 (2016)
- Interdisciplinary comparison and integration plans in North and South Korea, "Kim, J. W.", KEDI, 1~49, pp.IP2016-10 (2016)
- 김정원, "북한 초･중등 교육과정 및 교과서 정책 변화 방향", 한국교육, 42(4), pp.29~55 (2015), 한국교육개발원[DOI]
- "Lee Jae-myung and Yoon Seok-yeol, practical emphasis on ‘de facto unification' vs. securityfocused ‘free democratic unification’" (2021)[URL]
- "북한자료센터" (2021)[URL]
- Minn, Y. K., "Analysis of physical education and textbooks in North Korea", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 16(4), pp.329~339 (1996)
- 2015 Revised Science Education Curriculum, "MOE", MOE, ~ (2015)
- Teacher’s Guide Science 6-2, "MOE", Chunjae, ~ (2021)
- 나귀수, "남한의 2015 수학과 교육과정과 북한의 2013 수학과 교수요강의 비교", 수학교육학연구, 29(1), pp.17~43 (2019), 대한수학교육학회[DOI]
- Peace, and New Beginning:Finding the Direction of Education Policy - North Korea's Education Policy and the Task of Inter-Korean Education Exchange Cooperation - Education Seminar Preparing for Unification 2, "National Assembly", NA, ~ (2018)
- Noh, S. G., "A comparative study of chemistry curriculum and textbooks in the middle school of South and North Korea", The Bulletin of Science Education, 11, pp.15~42 (1999)
- 노석구, "2000년대 북한 소학교 자연 교과서의 체제와 내용 변화", 초등과학교육, 24(4), pp.452~464 (2005), 한국초등과학교육학회
- Development of a Science and Curriculum Standard for guiding North Korean Defectors - Elementary School-, "Noh, S. G.", KEDI, ~ (2013)
- 박광서, "남？북한 중학교 과학과 교육과정 및 교과서 비교 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(3), pp.481~498 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- Roth, W. M., "Critical Graphicacy" (2005), Springer
- International Comparative Study on Changes in Mathematics and Science Achievement:Analysis of TIMSS 2019 Results, "Sang, K. A.", KICE, ~, pp.RRE 2020-10 (2019)
- 신정하, "한국어능력시험(TOPIK) 읽기 텍스트의 난이도 연구 - TOPIKⅡ의 읽기 영역을 중심으로 -", 이중언어학, (62), pp.29~48 (2016), 이중언어학회[DOI]
- 신원섭, "북한 ‘제1차 전반적 12년제 의무교육강령’의 소학교 자연과목에서 에너지관련 교육내용 분석", 에너지기후변화교육, 7(1), pp.105~117 (2017), 에너지기후변화교육학회[DOI]
- 신원섭, "남북한 중학교 과학에서 에너지 교육 내용과 교과서 분석", 에너지기후변화교육, 8(1), pp.33~46 (2018), 에너지기후변화교육학회[DOI]
- 신원섭, "북한 소학교 3학년 자연 교과서의 에너지 관련 단원 분석", 에너지기후변화교육, 8(2), pp.149~159 (2018), 에너지기후변화교육학회[DOI]
- 심재호, "북한의 고급중학교1 생물과 남한의 생명과학1 교과서의 내용 특징 비교 분석", 생물교육, 48(1), pp.48~62 (2020), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- A Development of Korean Science Education Standards (KSES) for the Next Generation, "Song, J.", KOFAC, ~ (2018)
- 양승원, "남북한 초등학교 3학년 과학 교과서 비교- 탐구 경향성을 중심으로 -", 생물교육, 49(1), pp.69~80 (2021), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]