국회의 경찰예산 심의 내용의 실증 분석 -행안위, 예결특위 회의록 분석을 중심으로-

Abstract

This Paper discusses about the following implications; Congress Public Administration and Security Committee on Police Budget, of what intentional questions the core budget of Special Committee on the Budget Accounts concentrates and quality intentions show among the police services, as well as, the difference on the ruling and the opposition party. The paper was classified and analyzed through Content Analysis Method using specimen from core details on the police budget of Public Adminstration and Security Committee and Special Committee on Budget Accounts from year 2006 to 2010. After analyzing the data, for questions on Police Budget of Public Administration and Security Committee and Special Committee on the Budget Accounts are National Safety related budget, Police administration support, Expenses and Criminal Investigation in order, the number of questions are driven to degressive public order activity of the nation rather than proportionating to the total budget on different programs. Second, compared to Special Committee on the Budget Accounts showing a lot of debates on police administrative support, expenses, national life safe in order, the Public Administration and Security Committee shows national life safety, criminal investigation, police administrative support in order. If the Special Committee on the Budget Accounts relatively put importance on the control of police budget as its main duty, the Public Administration and Security Committee discusses more on budget and welfare issues directly related to national life. Third, both Public Administration and Security Committee and Special Committee on the Budget Accounts shows that they are project cost-orientated while the Standing Committee being project cost-orientated(intentionally) and Special Committee on the Budget Accounts as financial management-orientated, unlike the previous research. Fourth, analyzing the results on relationship of inquiry field and inquiry-oriented(intention), higher flexibility on budget shows in large areas of project cost compared to labor and basic expenses. The Committee agrees that the police budget is in shortage compared to the whole nation's budget and actively debate on it for improvement. Lastly, in questioning the difference between the ruling and opposition party, there wasn't much difference shown but there were questions as to ruling party are project-cost based and opposition party as financial management based in different budget details. In the ruling party, the legitimacy and inevitability of budget, they only attempts to receive the budget don't have legitimate evaluations on the budget and its budget-size letting them to be questioned. Also, in the opposition party, their budget isn't related on politics issues but is only set in a broad scale. I have concluded that a new paradigm is needed to modify and improve on the budget review.