본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

생물영재반 수업 프로그램의 영재교육 적합성 분석

Analysis of the Suitability of Gifted Education for the Biology Gifted Class Program

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine the suitability of the gifted class program. To this end, an improved evaluation tool for science gifted education programs was developed after several revisions. This evaluation tool is designed to assess major-focused, experiment-focused, and convergence-focused programs. In addition, it aims to evaluate the goals of gifted education, situation presentation, integration of acceleration and depth, self-directed learning, collaboration, individualization, differentiation, convergence, and problem identification and solving skills. The results of analyzing the validity of the biology gifted class program using this evaluation tool are as follows: As a result of evaluating the program classified as major-focused, it was found to be inadequate in almost all items except for the content composition and metacognitive thinking. In the case of experiment-focused program, there were differences in the levels of program components, common characteristics, and other areas depending on the program developer. As for the seven convergence-focused programs evaluated, all areas and evaluation items were rated as excellent except for the Convergence 1 program. These evaluations indicated that experiment-focused programs were generally better than major-focused programs, while convergence-focused programs outperformed experiment-focused programs in the context of gifted education.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the suitability of the gifted class program. To this end, an improved evaluation tool for science gifted education programs was developed after several revisions. This evaluation tool is designed to assess major-focused, experiment-focused, and convergence-focused programs. In addition, it aims to evaluate the goals of gifted education, situation presentation, integration of acceleration and depth, self-directed learning, collaboration, individualization, differentiation, convergence, and problem identification and solving skills. The results of analyzing the validity of the biology gifted class program using this evaluation tool are as follows: As a result of evaluating the program classified as major-focused, it was found to be inadequate in almost all items except for the content composition and metacognitive thinking. In the case of experiment-focused program, there were differences in the levels of program components, common characteristics, and other areas depending on the program developer. As for the seven convergence-focused programs evaluated, all areas and evaluation items were rated as excellent except for the Convergence 1 program. These evaluations indicated that experiment-focused programs were generally better than major-focused programs, while convergence-focused programs outperformed experiment-focused programs in the context of gifted education.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 권언근, "우리나라 과학영재교육 관련 논문의주제 분석-1980년부터 2008년까지-", 과학영재교육, 1(2), pp.63~76 (2009)
  2. 박성익, "영재교육과정의 모형과 운영방식에 관한 고찰", 영재교육연구, 9(1), pp.1~36 (1999)
  3. 표준 과학영재교육과정의 제안. 대학부설 과학영재교육원 발전사업단 최종보고서, "박종원", 대학부설과학영재교육원 발전사업단, ~ (2016)
  4. 박종원, "과학영재교육 프로그램에 대한 분석 연구 Ⅰ-물리 영역을 중심으로-", 영재교육연구, 10(1), pp.75~104 (2000)
  5. 국가 영재교육 프로그램 기준 초․중학교 과학, "서예원", 한국교육개발원, ~, pp.한국교육개발원 연구자료 CRM 2015-177 (2015)
  6. 양태연, "C 영재교육원을 통해 살펴본 대학부설 과학영재교육원 프로그램 효과성 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), pp.137~155 (2009)
  7. 양태연, "과학영재교육원 효과성에 관한 진단과 분석", 아시아교육연구, 9(4), pp.271~295 (2008)
  8. 양태연, "영재교육 교재적합도 및 교육내용 분석", 과학영재교육, 5(1), pp.1~14 (2013)
  9. 이갑정, "과학영재교육 프로그램 분석 : 생명과학 분야를 중심으로", 교과교육학연구, 27(2), pp.188~203 (2023)
  10. 이봉우, "과학영재 발굴·육성 종합계획 성과분석을 통한 과학영재교육 발전방안 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(5), pp.775~785 (2017)
  11. 이봉우, "대학부설 과학영재교육원의 운영 현황 분석 및 시사점 도출", 과학영재교육, 13(3), pp.160~171 (2021)
  12. Callahan, C. M., "Development of the scale for the evaluation of gifted identification instruments(SEGII)", Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(3), pp.133~140 (1993)
  13. Callahan, C. M., "Essential Readings in Gifted Education", pp.124~155 (2004), Corwin
  14. Renzulli, J. S., "The Enrichment Triad Model: A Guide for Developing Defensible Programs for the Gifted and Talented" (1977), Creative Learning Press
  15. Rogers, K. B., "Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented. A synthesis of the research on educational pratice", Gifted Child Quaterly, 51(4), pp.382~396 (2007)
  16. Tomlinson, C. A., "병행 교육과정: 학생의 잠재성과 능력을 개발하는 교육과정 계획" (2009), 학지사
  17. VanTassel-Baska, J., "A content analysis of evaluation findings across 20 gifted programs : A Clarion call for enhanced gifted program development", Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(3), pp.198~215 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)