변이할당분석을 이용한 광양항과 인천항의 수출구조 분석
Shift-Share Analysis and Export Structure of Gwangyang and Incheon Ports
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
물동량과 무역규모에서 인천항에 대한 광양항의 비교우위는 빠르게 약해지고, 광양항의 교역조건이 악화되는 추세여서 물동량 증가와 수익성 악화가 함께 이루어지는 빈곤화성장 가능성마저도 우려되고 있다. 이에 변이할당분석(shift-share analysis)을 통해 광양항과 인천항의 수출구조를 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 인천항의 주요 수출인 평판디스플레이는 지역할당효과로 수출증가에 상당한 기여를 한다는 것과, 수출비중이 높은 플라스틱제품, 건설광산기계, 자동차부품, 건전지 등은 산업구조효과와 지역할당효과가 모두 양(+)으로 인천항의 성장 전망이 밝게 나타났다. 광양항의 변이할당분석에서 산업구조효과는 합성고무, 기타석유화학제품, 정밀화학원료, 자동차부품에서 양의 값을 가지나, 정밀화학원료와 자동차부품 2개 품목에서만 지역할당효과가 양의 부호라는 것과, 종이제품과 고무제품은 두 효과가 모두 음이어서 사양산업임을 보인다.
Abstract
Shift-share analysis is a traditional tool for the measurement, comparison, and evaluation of interregional and sectoral performance. Its widespread use is explained by its simplicity and modest data requirements; it does not require primary data collection and its results are also relatively easy to assess and interpret. Since exports are a vital factor in the overall development of a port, some means of quantitatively assessing export changes must be developed. If shifts in exports can be isolated, they can be used to explain partially structural transformations in ports and to provide insight into possible future direction for port development. This study, therefore, uses a shift-share technique to isolate the various factors associated with export changes. The traditional shift-share model partitions the change of exports in a port into three effects: the national growth effect, the industrial mix effect and the regional share effect. The national growth effect attempts measure the change in exports in a port that would have occurred if its exports had grown at precisely the same rate as the national average. Hence, if a port grows at the same rate as the national average, it does not possess any comparative advantage in terms of resource endowments or human capital. The industrial mix effect associates the differential growth rate in exports between the region in question and the nation as a whole with the overall strengths or weaknesses of the relevant export sectors. Ideally, it is expected that a large proportion of a port’s exports should be concentrated in faster-growing industries. The regional share effect accounts for the differential change between a port and the nation. The regional share effect portrays the competitive position of a port in relation to the rest of the port. For instance, an export component that is growing faster in a port than its counterparts in the nation as a whole will add to the port’s overall growth relative to that of the nation, while a slower-growing component will bring forth an opposite effect. The export data used in this study are obtained from the Korea International Trade Association and consist of exports by two ports of 20 individual products. The particular product categories studied are at three-digit MTI (Ministry of Trade and Industry) level of disaggregation. The national growth effect for synthetic resin and steel plate-rolled products accounted for about 96 percent and 102 percent respectively of the increase in exports of Gwangyang Port or 3,685 and 4,226 million dollars respectively during the period under analysis. The fact that the industrial mix effects of the two products were negative−at 486 and 1,191 million dollars, respectively−can be interpreted to mean that Gwangyang Port’s main export products were growing slowly rather than rapidly. The regional share effects of the two products did not explain a large proportion of the change−at about 16 percent and 27 percent, respectively. The greatest regional share impact was in the steel plate-rolled product sector. The national growth effect of the automobile industry accounted for about 99 percent of the increase in export of Incheon Port or 3,378 million dollars, while that for the flat panel display only explained 1 percent or 100 million dollars. The regional share effect of flat panel display, however, explained a very large percentage of the change−88 percent or 12,238 million dollars−compared with automobiles, at 46 percent or 1,585 million dollars. The industrial mix effect of the two products was negative or explained only a small portion of the change.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강남호, "전북지역의 신산업발전전략에 관한 연구", 경영교육저널, 6, pp.1~12 (2005), 대한경영교육학회
- 김창범, "환율과 경기가 우리나라의 대 동남아시아 항만 수출입에 미치는 영향", 한국항만경제학회지, 27(4), pp.207~218 (2011), 한국항만경제학회
- 김창범, "환위험과 경기 불확실성이 우리나라의 수입물동량에 미치는 영향", 한국항만경제학회지, 26(4), pp.88~100 (2010), 한국항만경제학회
- 권오규, "변이할당모형을 이용한 수도권 인구 유출입 분석", 국토계획, 49(8), pp.5~19 (2014), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 나호수, "군산항만의 효율성 비교연구", 한국항만경제학회지, 25(2), pp.277~300 (2009), 한국항만경제학회
- 박원석, "영남지역의 특화산업 분석과 정책적 시사점", 한국지역지리학회지, 11(4), pp.463~475 (2005), 한국지역지리학회
- 박홍균, "광양․부산항의 항만물류배후단지 효율성 분석", 한국항만경제학회지, 27(1), pp.13~30 (2011), 한국항만경제학회
- 신원부, "지방자치단체 행정기능별 인력규모 분석", 한국지방자치연구, 9(4), pp.71~89 (2008), 대한지방자치학회
- 유영명, "부산지역 산업별 구조 변동에 따른 경쟁력 분석", 지방정부연구, 14(3), pp.295~313 (2010), 한국지방정부학회
- 윤동하, "Fuzzy-AHP를 이용한 광양항과 중국항만간의 물류네트워크 분석", 한국항만경제학회지, 27(4), pp.91~107 (2011), 한국항만경제학회
- 윤준상, "충남도청 이전지역의 산업구조분석을 통한 산업경쟁력 비교", 한국비교정부학보, 16(1), pp.137~148 (2012), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
- 이강웅, "퍼지AHP를 이용한 부산신항의 항만관리 방안에 관한 연구", 지방정부연구, 7(2), pp.69~87 (2003), 한국지방정부학회
- 이규명, "도시경제성장을 위한 창조산업의 활성화 및 정책적 노력:서울특별시를 중심으로", 한국사회와 행정연구, 25(2), pp.217~240 (2014), 서울행정학회
- 이정록, "광양만권의 공업화와 지역경제의 변화 : 1987-1996)", 국토계획, 35(2), pp.175~186 (2000), 한국국토·도시계획학회
- 송선욱, "Security관련 국제적 동향과 한국의 대응관세학회지(제5권 제2호)The Journal of Korea Research Society for Customs pp.43~67-미국 수입통관 관련 Security를 중심으로-", 관세학회지, 5(2), pp.43~67 (2004), 한국관세학회
- 정순관, "지역산업발전의 영향요인분석과 지방정부의 대응방안", 한국거버넌스학회보, 13(2), pp.129~150 (2006), 한국거버넌스학회
- 조진행, "동해항 및 속초항의 컨테이너물동량 예측에 관한 연구", 한국항만경제학회지, 26(1), pp.83~104 (2010), 한국항만경제학회
- 조진행, "새만금 신항만의 수요추정 비교분석 및 개발방안", 한국항만경제학회지, 27(4), pp.219~235 (2011), 한국항만경제학회
- 최봉호, "부산항,광양항,인천항의 물동량간 인과관계 분석", 한국항만경제학회지, 26(1), pp.61~82 (2010), 한국항만경제학회
- 최승묵, "광역 지방자치단체 관광산업 비교우위 분석: 지역순성장 효과 및 총시차를 중심으로", 관광레저연구, 25(8), pp.61~76 (2013), (사)한국관광레저학회
- 최재용, "지역산업의 경쟁력과 성장요인에 관한 연구: 서울시 강동구를 중심으로", 한국정책연구, 12(3), pp.323~344 (2012), 경인행정학회
- Barff, R. A., "Dynamic Shift-share Analysis", Growth and Change, 19, pp.1~10 (1998)
- Chiang, S., "Location Quotient and Trade, Annals of Regional Science", Annals of Regional Science, 43, pp.399~414 (2009)
- Chiang, S., "Shift-Share Analysis and International Trade", Annals of Regional Science, 49, pp.571~588 (2012)
- Dinc, M, "Source of Regional Inefficiency: A Integrated Shift-share, Data Envelopment Analysis and Input-Output Approach", Annals of Regional Science, 33, pp.469~489 (1999)
- Dinc, M., "Productivity, International Trade and Reference Area Interactions in Shift-share Analysis: Some Operational Notes", Growth and Change, 36, pp.374~394 (2005)
- Dinc, M., "International Trade and Shift-share Analysis: a Specification Note", Economic Development Quarterly, 12, pp.337~343 (1998)
- Haynes, K., "Productivity Change in Manufacturing Regions: A Multifactor", Shift-share Approach, 1997, pp.28, 201~221
- Loveridges, S., "A Review and Comparison of Shift-share Identities", International Regional Science Review, 21, pp.27~58 (1998)
- Markusen, A., "International Trade, Productivity and US Job Growth: A Shift-share Interpretation", International Regional Science Review, 14, pp.15~39 (1991)
- Noponen, H., "Trade and American Cities: Who has the Comparative Advantage?", Economic Development Quarterly, 11, pp.67~87 (1997)
- Noponen, H., "International Trade and Shift-share Analysis: a Response to Dinc and Haynes", Economic Development Quarterly, 12, pp.344~350 (1998)
- Parteka, A., "The Role of Trade in Intra-Industry Productivity Growth-the Case of Old and New European Union Countries", Review of Development Economics, 17, pp.712~731 (2013)
- Sihag, B.S., "Shift-Share Analysis: The International Dimension", Growth and Change, 20, pp.80~88 (1989)
- Wadely, D., "Straightening Up Shift-share Analysis", Annals of Regional Science, 37, pp.259~261 (2003)
