국내 IUCN Red List of Ecosystem(생태계 적색목록) 평가를 위한 국제 사례 연구와 전략 제시
International Case Study and Strategy Proposal for IUCN Red List of Ecosystem(RLE) Assessment in South Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
IUCN 생태계 적색목록은 생물다양성의 감소 위험이 높은 생태계를 평가하고 식별하기 위한 글로벌 표준으로, 효과적인 생태계 관리 및 보전 정책 수립에 필요한 과학적 근거를 제공한다. IUCN 생태계 적색목록은 쿤밍-몬트리올글로벌 생물다양성 프레임워크 목표 A의 핵심지표(A.1)로 지정하였다. 생태계 적색목록 평가는 특정 생태계 유형을분포의 감소(기준 A), 제한된 분포(기준 B), 환경 황폐화(기준 C), 생물학적 상호작용의 변화(기준 D), 생태계 붕괴위험의 정량적 추정(기준 E)으로 생태계 붕괴 징후를 판별한다. IUCN 생태계 적색목록은 2014년부터 110개 이상의 국가에서 평가를 진행하였다. 80% 이상이 육상 및 육상-담수 생태계에서 평가를 진행하였으며, 이중 열대림과아열대림에 위협 받는 생태계가 집중 분포하고 있다. 평가 기준은 공간적 징후(기준 A 및 B)에서 68.8%로 집중되어 있다. 국내에서 생태계 적색목록을 평가를 적용하기 위한 고려사항은 크게 세가지로 나뉜다. 첫째, 국내 적용가능한 지구 생태계 유형(GET)을 적립해야 한다. 둘째, 생태계 적색목록 범주기〮준 중 공간적 징후 평가에서 국내의소규모로 이루어진 다양한 생태계 유형에 적용 가능한지를 판단해야 한다. 마지막으로 평가를 위한 활용 가능한 시계열(50년) 데이터 수집을 고려해야 한다. 이러한 고려사항을 바탕으로 국내에 IUCN 생태계 적색목록 평가를 적용하면, 우리나라의 독특한 생태계 유형의 현재 상태를 정확하게 파악할 수 있을 것이며, 이는 세계적인 생태계 보전및 복원 노력에 기여할 것이다.
Abstract
The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems serves as a global standard for assessing and identifying ecosystems at high risk of biodiversity loss, providing scientific evidence necessary for effective ecosystem management and conservation policy formulation. The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems has been designated as a key indicator (A.1) for Goal A of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. The assessment of the Red List of Ecosystems discerns signs of ecosystem collapse through specific criteria: reduction in distribution (Criterion A), restricted distribution (Criterion B), environmental degradation (Criterion C), changes in biological interaction (Criterion D), and quantitative estimation of the risk of ecosystem collapse (Criterion E). Since 2014, the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems has been evaluated in over 110 countries, with more than 80% of the assessments conducted in terrestrial and inland water ecosystems, among which tropical and subtropical forests are distributed ecosystems under threat. The assessment criteria are concentrated on spatial signs (Criteria A and B), accounting for 68.8%. There are three main considerations for applying the Red List of Ecosystems assessment domestically: First, it is necessary to compile applicable terrestrial ecosystem types within the country. Second, it must be determined whether the spatial sign assessment among the Red List of Ecosystems categories can be applied to the various small-scale ecosystems found domestically. Lastly, the collection of usable time series data (50 years) for assessment must be considered. Based on these considerations, applying the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems assessment domestically would enable an accurate understanding of the current state of the country's unique ecosystem types, contributing to global efforts in ecosystem conservation and restoration.
참고문헌 (28)
- Alberto J. Alaniz, "Operationalizing the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems in public policy", Conservation Letters, 12(5) (2019), Wiley[DOI]
- "Guidelines for the application of IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Categories and Criteria, version 1.1." (2017)[URL]
- Lucie M. Bland, "Impacts of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems on conservation policy and practice", Conservation Letters, 12(5) (2019), Wiley[DOI]
- CÉLINE BOISVENUE, "Impacts of climate change on natural forest productivity – evidence since the middle of the 20th century", Global Change Biology, 12(5), pp.862~882 (2006), Wiley[DOI]
- Bradley J. Cardinale, "Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity", Nature, 486(7401), pp.59~67 (2012), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Guoke Chen, "Red list of China's forest ecosystems: A conservation assessment and protected area gap analysis", Biological Conservation, 248, pp.108636~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Sandra Díaz, "Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change", Science, 366(6471) (2019), American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)[DOI]
- Andrés Etter, "Assessing restoration priorities for high-risk ecosystems: An application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems", Land Use Policy, 99, pp.104874~ (2020), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Kevin J. Gaston, "The sizes of species’ geographic ranges", Journal of Applied Ecology, 46(1), pp.1~9 (2009), Wiley[DOI]
- Ilkka Hanski, "Metapopulation dynamics", Nature, 396(6706), pp.41~49 (1998), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- W. Stanley Harpole, "Grassland species loss resulting from reduced niche dimension", Nature, 446(7137), pp.791~793 (2007), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- "IUCN Red List of Ecosystem (IUCN RLE)" (2023)[URL]
- "IUCN Global ecosystem typology 2.0., Descriptive profiles for biomes and ecosystem functional groups" (2020)[URL]
- David A. Keith, "The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems: Motivations, Challenges, and Applications", Conservation Letters, 8(3), pp.214~226 (2015), Wiley[DOI]
- David A. Keith, "Scientific Foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems", PLoS ONE, 8(5), pp.e62111~ (2013), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- 김은숙, "아고산 침엽수림 분포 면적의 20년간 변화 분석", 한국산림과학회지, 108(1), pp.10~20 (2019), 한국산림과학회[DOI]
- Calvin K. F. Lee, "Redlistr: tools for the IUCN Red Lists of ecosystems and threatened species in R", Ecography, 42(5), pp.1050~1055 (2019), Wiley[DOI]
- MacArthur, RH, "The theory of island biogeography. Vol. 1" (2001), Princeton university press
- GEORGINA M. MACE, "Assessing Extinction Threats: Toward a Reevaluation of IUCN Threatened Species Categories", Conservation Biology, 5(2), pp.148~157 (1991), Wiley[DOI]
- Georgina M. Mace, "Aiming higher to bend the curve of biodiversity loss", Nature Sustainability, 1(9), pp.448~451 (2018), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Meghan W McKnight, "Putting Beta-Diversity on the Map: Broad-Scale Congruence and Coincidence in the Extremes", PLoS Biology, 5(10), pp.e272~ (2007), Public Library of Science (PLoS)[DOI]
- Millennium ecosystem assessment, M. E. A., "Ecosystems and human well-being Vol. 5", pp.563~ (2005), Island press
- Nicholas J. Murray, "The use of range size to assess risks to biodiversity from stochastic threats", Diversity and Distributions, 23(5), pp.474~483 (2017), Wiley[DOI]
- Nicholas J. Murray, "Remap: An online remote sensing application for land cover classification and monitoring", Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(9), pp.2019~2027 (2018), Wiley[DOI]
- Nicholson, E, "Beyond the headline: roles of the Red List of Ecosystems in implementing the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework" (2023), OSF
- Jon Paul Rodríguez, "A practical guide to the application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems criteria", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1662), pp.20140003~ (2015), The Royal Society[DOI]
- 손희정, "토지피복지도를 활용한 IUCN 생태계유형분류 국내 적용", 한국환경생태학회지, 37(3), pp.209~220 (2023), 한국환경생태학회
- Jianbo Tan, "Preliminary assessment of ecosystem risk based on IUCN criteria in a hierarchy of spatial domains: A case study in Southwestern China", Biological Conservation, 215, pp.152~161 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]