본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

생태계 보호지역의 합리적 지정을 위한 평가방법의 개발과 적용방안

Development of Designation Criteria for Ecological Protected Areas and its Application Methodology

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류환경공학

초록

Attempts to develope designation criteria for ecological protected areas were made forrational and scientific designation and management of ‘ecosystem and landscape conservationareas’, ‘wetland protection areas’, ‘special islands protection areas’, and ‘wildlife protectedareas’ which have been designated and managed by the Ministry of Environment. Throughanalysis of the requisites and criteria of IUCN, UNESCO, Natura 2000, the Ramsar convention,the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Germany as well as various academicresearches, evaluation items of the protected areas were classified into naturalness, biodiversity,ecosystem, and scientific values. These classification titles are reflection of Korean lawsconcerning the 4 protected areas described above. Of these items ‘naturalness’ is composed of 3factors of wilderness, geomorphology and landscape, and vegetation. ‘Biodiversity’ iscomposed of the 5 factors of species diversity, endangered species, rare species, indigenousbiological resources, and habitat of wetland wild animals. ‘Ecosystem’ is composed of 5 factorsof typicalness, diversity, rarity, restoration ability, and degree of interference. All factors arescored using a 3 point scale of high, middle, or low and are then transformed into the numericalindex for designating and zoning purposes. Conclusively, it is expected that the developed methodology will be highly applicable with field verifications.

Abstract

Attempts to develope designation criteria for ecological protected areas were made forrational and scientific designation and management of ‘ecosystem and landscape conservationareas’, ‘wetland protection areas’, ‘special islands protection areas’, and ‘wildlife protectedareas’ which have been designated and managed by the Ministry of Environment. Throughanalysis of the requisites and criteria of IUCN, UNESCO, Natura 2000, the Ramsar convention,the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Germany as well as various academicresearches, evaluation items of the protected areas were classified into naturalness, biodiversity,ecosystem, and scientific values. These classification titles are reflection of Korean lawsconcerning the 4 protected areas described above. Of these items ‘naturalness’ is composed of 3factors of wilderness, geomorphology and landscape, and vegetation. ‘Biodiversity’ iscomposed of the 5 factors of species diversity, endangered species, rare species, indigenousbiological resources, and habitat of wetland wild animals. ‘Ecosystem’ is composed of 5 factorsof typicalness, diversity, rarity, restoration ability, and degree of interference. All factors arescored using a 3 point scale of high, middle, or low and are then transformed into the numericalindex for designating and zoning purposes. Conclusively, it is expected that the developed methodology will be highly applicable with field verifications.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 구본학, "RMA(일반기능평가기법)을 이용한 내륙습지 기능평가", 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지, 4(3), pp.38~48 (2001)
  2. 김성일, "우리나라 보호지역에 IUCN 카테고리 채택방안-국립공원을 중심으로" (2006), 국립공원관리공단
  3. 남정호, "연안·해양 보호구역 통합관리체제 구축방안 연구", pp.233~ (2004), 한국해양수산개발원
  4. 남정호, "서해연안 해양평화공원 지정 및 관리 방안 연구(1)", pp.1~390 (2005), 한국해양수산개발원
  5. 박용하, "선진외국 보호지역의 관리기법 연구" (2006), 환경부
  6. 박용하, "생태계보호지역 지정 기준 객관화 연구" (2007), 환경부
  7. 신현탁, "보전우선순위에 근거한 자연생태계 보전지역 평가기준에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2000
  8. 최재용, "남극 환경 보호구역 지정에 관한 연구" (2006), 환경부
  9. 환경부, "백두대간 보호지역의 지정원칙과 기준안, 내부자료", ~ (2004)
  10. 환경부, "보도자료: 왕피천 유역 생태·경관 보전지역으로 지정" (2005), 해양수산부
  11. 해양수산부, "해양보호구역 관리체계 구축연구" (2005), 해양수산부
  12. 日本環境省, "Nature Conservation in Japan", pp.51~ (2006), Nature Conservation Bureau, Ministry of the Environment
  13. Diamond, J. M., "The island dilemma: Lessons of modern biogeographic studies for the design of natural reserves", Biological Conservation, 7, pp.129~146 (1975)
  14. Disney, R. H. L., "Assessments using invertebrates: Posing the problem, in Wildlife conservation evaluation", pp.271~293 (1986), Chapman & Hall
  15. Freeman, C., "Development of a simple method for site survey and assessment in urban areas", Landscape and Urbanlanning, 44, pp.1~11 (1999)
  16. Freitag S., "Relative occupancy. endermism, taxonomicdistinctiveness and vulnerability: Prioritizing regional conservation actions", Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, pp.211~232 (1997)
  17. "Nature Conservation Areas"[URL]
  18. IUCN(International Union for Conservation ofNature and Natural Resources), "Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories", ~ (1994)
  19. [URL]
  20. "Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010-and beyond sustaining ecosystem services for human well-being, Commission of The European Communities"[URL]
  21. Ohio EPA, "Ohio Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands. Version 5.0. Background Information Score Boundary Worksheet Narrative Rating Categorization Worksheets Field Scoring Form (2001.2.1)", ~ (2001)
  22. Ohio EPA, "Division of Surface Water", ~
  23. primack, B. R., "Essentials of conservation biology", pp.397~479 (1998), Sinauer Associates Inc.
  24. "Ramsar Convention(Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat)"[URL]
  25. Ranney, J. W., "The importance of edge in the structure and dynamics of forest islands in Forest island dynamics inman-dominated landscapes", pp.67~95 (1981), SpringerVerlag Press
  26. Ratcliffe, D. A., "A nature conservation review, 1", pp.6~10 (1977), Cambridge University Press
  27. Ronald G. O., "Ecological Criteria for Evaluating Wetlands" (1996), Midcontinent Ecological Science Center
  28. Salm, R. V., "Marine and Coastal Protected Areas: A guide for planners and managers", IUCN
  29. "UK DEFRA(Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)"[URL]
  30. "Guidelines for Selection of Biological SSSIs"[URL]
  31. "The Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves"[URL]
  32. "Criteria for Parkland"[URL]
  33. Usher. M. B., "An assessment of conservation values within a large site of special scientific interest in north yorkshire", Field Studies, 5, pp.323~348 (1980)
  34. World Heritage Centre, "Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention" (2005), UNESCO-World Heritage Centre Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)