디베이트를 활용한 연계·단계적 글쓰기 수업 모형: 대학 기초교양 글쓰기 수업 사례를 중심으로

Abstract

Classes using debate are effective in improving the ability of argumentative writing. Ability to write arguments becomes the foundation of academic writing, which is the ultimate goal of university writing. System of logical thinking and ability to argue improve in the process of preparing and executing the actual debate. The process of creating pros and cons of a debate topic is the same as the process of constructing a structure of arguments and becomes the basis of academic writing. This study suggests a teaching method using debate that carries out all the basic courses of Korean language education composed of ‘reading·listening·speaking·writing’ as a way to overcome difficulties in teaching writing. This teaching method is a class program that allows students to write arguments, which is the last step of debate class model, systematically and naturally because these four areas are linked together. This study suggests a class model that gets completed through the process of ‘preparing pre-debate materials’→‘cases of actual debate classes’→‘argumentative writing of debate topic’ based on actual class experiences. This class model gets completed step by step in a systematic way through linked interaction and systematic methods in the process of using various activities before and after the debate and writing activities of various elements. The effect of writing classes that applied debate can be summarized as the effect of preparation and execution of debate and the effect of judgement and jury’s opinion. Data investigation constructs the reason of opinion and background of argument, and cross inquiry is effective in strengthening argumentative power and the core of writing by focusing on the radical point. Decision and opinion of juries are specifically reflected in the topic selection and logical development of writing. It was identified that these effects of before and after the debate and efficacy of the process are all significant according to the analysis on the effectiveness verification based on the survey of learners.