朝鮮 後期 漢詩에 나타난 事實性에 대한 一考察 -<田間紀事>와 <己庚紀事>를 대상으로
A Review of Reality in <Jseongan Gisa> and <Gigyeong Gisa>
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
We can refer to Jeong Yak-yong (1762-1836) and Lee Hak-gyu (1770-1834) as representative figures on the side of practice of realistic poetic recognition in the late Joseon. Jeong Yak-yong has been evaluated as a great scholar who integrated Sil-hak ‘practical scholarship’ on one hand, and occupies a great position in the history of the late Joseon’s ideology on the other. Lee Hak-gyu also underwent life in exile for 34 years, and was influenced considerably on the poetic side by Jeong while exchanging with him. Of his works, those dealing with the miserable aspects of farmers occupy the central positions. He also created <Gigyeong Gisa> as a reply to Jeong’s <Jeongan Gisa>. As the two works are composed of narrative contents in a Sanbaipian-style form, they take reality as one of their most prominent characteristics. First of all, they figure aspects of farmers facing penury, and of bureaucrats full of corruption and vanity. In addition, as narrative poems, they are understood as having a structure of confrontation. However, considering them through thematic examination, they have limitations in that they cannot solve all the problems with the reality at that time. The two authors’ have many classic Chinese poems. Hence, we cannot account for the entire aspects of their works with only a few fragments. It is another task to review other works by these two authors.
Abstract
We can refer to Jeong Yak-yong (1762-1836) and Lee Hak-gyu (1770-1834) as representative figures on the side of practice of realistic poetic recognition in the late Joseon. Jeong Yak-yong has been evaluated as a great scholar who integrated Sil-hak ‘practical scholarship’ on one hand, and occupies a great position in the history of the late Joseon’s ideology on the other. Lee Hak-gyu also underwent life in exile for 34 years, and was influenced considerably on the poetic side by Jeong while exchanging with him. Of his works, those dealing with the miserable aspects of farmers occupy the central positions. He also created <Gigyeong Gisa> as a reply to Jeong’s <Jeongan Gisa>. As the two works are composed of narrative contents in a Sanbaipian-style form, they take reality as one of their most prominent characteristics. First of all, they figure aspects of farmers facing penury, and of bureaucrats full of corruption and vanity. In addition, as narrative poems, they are understood as having a structure of confrontation. However, considering them through thematic examination, they have limitations in that they cannot solve all the problems with the reality at that time. The two authors’ have many classic Chinese poems. Hence, we cannot account for the entire aspects of their works with only a few fragments. It is another task to review other works by these two authors.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김상홍, "다산 정약용 문학 연구" (1985), 단국대학교 출판부
- 김욱동, "리얼리즘과 그 불만" (1989), 청하
- 김윤식, "한국근대문학사상사" (1984), 한길사
- 김흥규, "조선 후기의 문학" (2002), 고려대학교 출판부
- 김흥규, "조선 후기의 시경론과 시의식" (1982), 민족문화연구소
- 박무영, "정약용의 시와 사유 방식" (2002), 태학사
- 백원철, "낙하생 이학규 문학 연구" (2005), 보고사
- 사회과학원, "우리나라 문학에서 사실주의 발생?발전 논쟁", 사계절
- 송재소, "다산 시선" (1981), 창작과 비평사
- 송재소, "다산 시 연구" (1986), 창작과 비평사
- 심규수, "유배지 역사 기행", 집현전
- 여균동, "리얼리즘의 역사와 이론" (1986), 미래사
- 이우성, "한국의 역사상" (1982), 창작과 비평사
- 이경덕, "반영이론과 생산이론" (1986), 까치
- 이현석, "리얼리즘이란 무엇인가" (1987), 세계
- 임형택, "이조시대 서사시" (1992), 창작과 비평사
- 장사선, "한국 리얼리즘 문학론" (1988), 새문사
- 조동일, "한국문학사상사시론" (1978), 지식산업사
- 조동일, "한국문학통사. 3권" (1984), 지식산업사
- 진재교, "이조 후기 한시의 사회사" (2001), 소명
- 최신호, "정다산의 문학관", 한국한문학연구, 1 (1976), 한국한문학연구회
- 한우근, "정다산 연구의 현황" (1985), 민음사
- 한창훈, "茶山 漢詩의 사실성 연구", 백록어문, 8 (1991), 백록어문학회
- 홍이섭, "정약용의 정치, 경제 사상 연구" (1959), 한국연구도서관