본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

산업안전보건법에서의 특수건강진단의 법률적 고찰

Legal Issues on The Special Medical Examination in The Occupational Safety and Health Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Results that compare the special medical examination of foreign law system with Korea law system, there is necessity to open informations concerning workers’health to an employer. However, there is no regulations that should be done opening to an employer. If an employer analyzes open to meaning that must protect workers’æhealth before the occurrence of accidents through the continuous interest and management, it seems to be necessary. However, as a matter of fact, the medical examination data is used to restructure an organization without workers’healthcare. Like this, the workers’disadvantage is expected to happen through the irrational direction or command of an employer. Therefore, the plan that can offer essential informations that need in healthcare should be readied to solve this problems that happen the workers’à disadvantage. If the results of medical examination of observed persons or persons with abnomal findings is appeared, the medical examination service must offer necessary data. And, at this time, the medical examination service should offer informations that are agreed and conferred by workers in the advance to an employer. Then, it seems to be able to protect the right to know and privacy. Among some opinions, if see in meaning that the high obligation than low should be enforced on the Occupational Safety and Health Act, it can claim that can sacrifice personal information protection for the health precaution. So, in the solutions, this can see that do not understand enough legal basis in case of the occasion that open to employer taking advantage of workers’è agreement as formal in the advance. Therefore, the workers’agreement sees that must be agreement by my pure expression that another person’ suggestions is excluded by the method that is the normal in formality. Simply thinking that it is reasonable to behave which the value is high, it brings the nonlegal binding force to do the prior agreement before the medical examination. Therefore, I see that must take advantage of workers’ agreement through the enough investigation after the medical examination results appears. Like this, passing the process seems to be the plan to solve the problems that happen by judging the obligation value through penal provisions in point of time that importance about personal information have characterized recently.

Abstract

Results that compare the special medical examination of foreign law system with Korea law system, there is necessity to open informations concerning workers’health to an employer. However, there is no regulations that should be done opening to an employer. If an employer analyzes open to meaning that must protect workers’æhealth before the occurrence of accidents through the continuous interest and management, it seems to be necessary. However, as a matter of fact, the medical examination data is used to restructure an organization without workers’healthcare. Like this, the workers’disadvantage is expected to happen through the irrational direction or command of an employer. Therefore, the plan that can offer essential informations that need in healthcare should be readied to solve this problems that happen the workers’à disadvantage. If the results of medical examination of observed persons or persons with abnomal findings is appeared, the medical examination service must offer necessary data. And, at this time, the medical examination service should offer informations that are agreed and conferred by workers in the advance to an employer. Then, it seems to be able to protect the right to know and privacy. Among some opinions, if see in meaning that the high obligation than low should be enforced on the Occupational Safety and Health Act, it can claim that can sacrifice personal information protection for the health precaution. So, in the solutions, this can see that do not understand enough legal basis in case of the occasion that open to employer taking advantage of workers’è agreement as formal in the advance. Therefore, the workers’agreement sees that must be agreement by my pure expression that another person’ suggestions is excluded by the method that is the normal in formality. Simply thinking that it is reasonable to behave which the value is high, it brings the nonlegal binding force to do the prior agreement before the medical examination. Therefore, I see that must take advantage of workers’ agreement through the enough investigation after the medical examination results appears. Like this, passing the process seems to be the plan to solve the problems that happen by judging the obligation value through penal provisions in point of time that importance about personal information have characterized recently.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2004), 법문사
  2. 금동흠, "헌법강의" (2004), 법률출판사
  3. 특수건간진단제도 운영실태조사 및 특수건강진단제도개선방안에 관한 연구, "김양호", 산업안전보건연구원, ~ (1997)
  4. 박양빈, "의무충돌", 단국대학교 법학논총, 20 (1994), 단국대출판부
  5. 특수건강진단 질 제고 방안 연구, "박정선", 산업안전보건연구원, ~ (2007)
  6. 백형구, "의무의 충돌", 고시계 (1976)
  7. 산업안전공단, "근로자 건강진단 실시결과(2003~2004), 산업안전공단 산업안전보건법시행규칙 별지서식 제22-1호, 제22-2호", ~
  8. 성낙인, "헌법학" (2003), 법문사
  9. 임상혁, "전국민주노동조합총연맹의 특수건강진단제도의 문제점과 개선방안 토론회자료집", ~ (2007)
  10. 전종주, "박양빈교수 화갑기념논문집" (1996), 법문사
  11. "산업안전보건법 및 시행령, 시행규칙", ~
  12. "공공기관의 개인정보보호에 관한 법률", ~
  13. "일본노동안전위생법", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)