판례상 이사의 임무 해태 및 위반에 따른 배임죄 적용에 대한 검토
A Study on Application for Breach of Trust by infringement of Duty in Inside Director and Outside Director on Precedent
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Director and outside director are to requirements of the times to discharge their duties. Obtain a seat on the board of directors have personality in circumspection. Director and outside director can take a different road if their disagree, but They should be careful when calling it into question and put up with any burden that may be caused by their decision. Director and outside director are to fulfillment with faithfully kept. Outside directors in the duty,cutoff the company resulted t bankrupt. Director and outside director are corruptible position. Director and outside director are apt to abuse their position. Therefore it require to restrain criminal law. But there are many problem. The first, civil affairs and criminal affairs is not distinguish clearly. The second, negligence of their duties link directly with commit a copycat crime. The third, copycat crime of director and outside director leave room for questions to relate breach of trust. This is relation to the sphere of activity. Sphere of activity in director must interpret a matter in a broad sense. Because it is a shortcut to lead the protection of property. The inflict severe punishment for breach of trust take a thing as security. This security will contribute greatly to the economic development and financial health of the management.
Abstract
Director and outside director are to requirements of the times to discharge their duties. Obtain a seat on the board of directors have personality in circumspection. Director and outside director can take a different road if their disagree, but They should be careful when calling it into question and put up with any burden that may be caused by their decision. Director and outside director are to fulfillment with faithfully kept. Outside directors in the duty,cutoff the company resulted t bankrupt. Director and outside director are corruptible position. Director and outside director are apt to abuse their position. Therefore it require to restrain criminal law. But there are many problem. The first, civil affairs and criminal affairs is not distinguish clearly. The second, negligence of their duties link directly with commit a copycat crime. The third, copycat crime of director and outside director leave room for questions to relate breach of trust. This is relation to the sphere of activity. Sphere of activity in director must interpret a matter in a broad sense. Because it is a shortcut to lead the protection of property. The inflict severe punishment for breach of trust take a thing as security. This security will contribute greatly to the economic development and financial health of the management.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김일수, "형법각론" (2007), 박영사
- 박상기, "형법각론" (2010), 박영사
- 손동권, "형법각론 제3개정판" (2008), 율곡출판사
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2010), 대명출판사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2010), 박영사
- 임웅, "형법각론" (2007), 법문사
- 정성근, "형법각론" (2007), 삼지원
- 김영균, "사외이사의 책임제한ㆍ완화론에 대한 비판적 검토", 기업법연구, 21(2), pp.97~126 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 김영호, "우리나라 사외이사제도의 운영방향", 증권조사월보, ~ (1998)
- 김용열, "사외이사제도와 이사회 개혁", 상장 (2005)
- 김재형, "이사의 회사에 대한 의무와 책임", 기업법연구, 2통권 : 2 (1996)
- 박강익, "사외이사의 현황과 문제점에 관한 연구", 기업법연구, 21(4), pp.177~200 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 양만식, "현대 주식회사에서의 이사의 책임범위와 신뢰보호", 기업법연구, 21(3), pp.113~156 (2007), 한국기업법학회
- 오성근, "상법상 이사의 회사채권자에 대한 책임론", 기업법연구, 23(1), pp.213~248 (2009), 한국기업법학회
- 우베 무어만, "배임죄(§266 형법)와 모험거래(Risikogechäft)", 형사정책연구, 20(4), pp.27~67 (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 원정연, "내부감사와 외부감사 기능의 강화", 한국법학원보, (80) (1988)
- 이상현, "삼성 에버랜드와 SDS 판결을 통해 본 기업지배구조에 관한 업무상 배임죄의 해석 및 법정책", 규제연구, 20(1), pp.113~145 (2011), 한국규제학회
- 이정민, "경영판단원칙과 업무상 배임죄", 형사정책연구, 18(4), pp.159~188 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이철송, "資本去來와 任員의 刑事責任", 인권과 정의, (359), pp.96~116 (2006), 대한변호사협회
- 이훈종, "전환사채의 저가발행과 배임죄에 관한 판례평석 - 삼성에버랜드 주식회사의 전환사채발행을 중심으로 -", 한양법학, (29), pp.435~458 (2010), 한양법학회
- 정광선, "기업지배구조의 선진화" (1998), 한국증권연구원·한국증권거래소
- 조성종, "이사의 회사에 대한 손해배상책임과 경영판단원칙", 법학연구, (23), pp.163~179 (2006), 한국법학회
- 허일태, "배임죄에서의 행위주체와 손해의 개념", 비교형사법연구, 6(2-1), pp.137~158 (2004), 한국비교형사법학회
- 허창복, "기업의 투명성 보장에 관한 증권거래법상의 제도", 한국법학원보, (80) (1900)
- Kühne, Hans-Heiner, "Strafprozeßlehre, 5. Aufl" (1999)
- Peter, Karl, "Heildelberg, 4. Aufl" (1985)
- Ranft, Otfried, Strafprozeßrecht., "München usw., 2. Aufl" (1995)
- Roxin, Claus, Strafprozeßrecht, "München, 12. Aufl" (1988)
- M. Jefferson, "Corporate Criminal Liability in the 1990s", Journal of Criminal Law, 64(106) (2000)
- S. Trotter, "Safety and Profit", New Law Journal, 149(1279) (1999)