본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국과 뉴질랜드 초등학교 저학년의 덧셈과 뺄셈 지도방법에 관한 고찰

A Note on Teaching Method of Addition and Subtraction between Korea and New Zealand Primary School

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류수학

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze teaching method of addition and subtraction of whole number in Korea and New Zealand lower grade textbook and to get some suggestive points to develop mathematics curriculum and for a qualitative improvement of textbook. To do this, we will analyze focusing on teaching material, type and method of teaching, cases of real teaching and in the case of New Zealand, we will analyze portfolios together to see what kind of things do they deal with related to addition and subtraction. From these analyzing, the results are as follows:First, the guideline of accomplishment of group of year are stated in 2009 revised curriculum in Korea but it is rough. On the other hand, the level of accomplishment from kindergarten to high school are stated divided by eight kinds of thing in New Zealand curriculum. Second, there were common and different points in the aspect of teaching material. The common points are that both of our Korea and New Zealand are using materials related to real life intimately and the diifferent points are to use technology such as calculator and computer. They are more widely used in New Zealand than our Korea. Third, Korea had used routine method mainly but New Zealand had used method to develop creativity of learner such as to write problem corresponding to expression, posing problem corresponding to information, to complete table and find pattern and to write word problem to explain pattern and so on. Fourth, we could see special calculation strategies in the case of teaching addition and subtraction such as concept of double, compensation, various strategy based on counting of number, addition of the same number, magic square, near-double which are not finding in our mathematics textbook. Fifth, in the New Zealand textbook they had used teaching methods inducing curiosity of learner such as finding message and puzzle problem than solving given problem simply.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze teaching method of addition and subtraction of whole number in Korea and New Zealand lower grade textbook and to get some suggestive points to develop mathematics curriculum and for a qualitative improvement of textbook. To do this, we will analyze focusing on teaching material, type and method of teaching, cases of real teaching and in the case of New Zealand, we will analyze portfolios together to see what kind of things do they deal with related to addition and subtraction. From these analyzing, the results are as follows:First, the guideline of accomplishment of group of year are stated in 2009 revised curriculum in Korea but it is rough. On the other hand, the level of accomplishment from kindergarten to high school are stated divided by eight kinds of thing in New Zealand curriculum. Second, there were common and different points in the aspect of teaching material. The common points are that both of our Korea and New Zealand are using materials related to real life intimately and the diifferent points are to use technology such as calculator and computer. They are more widely used in New Zealand than our Korea. Third, Korea had used routine method mainly but New Zealand had used method to develop creativity of learner such as to write problem corresponding to expression, posing problem corresponding to information, to complete table and find pattern and to write word problem to explain pattern and so on. Fourth, we could see special calculation strategies in the case of teaching addition and subtraction such as concept of double, compensation, various strategy based on counting of number, addition of the same number, magic square, near-double which are not finding in our mathematics textbook. Fifth, in the New Zealand textbook they had used teaching methods inducing curiosity of learner such as finding message and puzzle problem than solving given problem simply.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 교육과학기술부, "수학 1∼ 2학년군 수학 ➀, ➁, ➂, ➃" (2013), (주)천재교육
  2. 김연미, "한국과 미국의 초등학교 저학년수학 교과서 및 교육과정의비교와 분석", 수학교육학연구, 9(1), pp.121~132 (1999)
  3. 김판수, "한국과 중국의 초등수학 교과서의 내용과 전개방식 비교 -수 개념과 덧셈 뺄셈 영역을 중심으로-", 한국초등수학교육학회지, 15(3), pp.599~617 (2011), 한국초등수학교육학회
  4. 박경미, "한국, 일본과 미국, 영국의 수학 교과서 비교", 학교수학, 4(2), pp.317~331 (2002)
  5. 박교식, "우리나라와 일본의 초등학교 1학년 수학 교과서 비교 연구: <수와 연산> 영역을 중심으로", 한국학교수학회논문집, 17(2), pp.235~249 (2014), 한국학교수학회
  6. 서보억, "2011년 발표된 한국과 중국의 초등학교 수학과 교육과정 비교 분석", 초등수학교육, 18(1), pp.1~16 (2015), 한국수학교육학회
  7. 엄인애, "한국과 러시아의 초등학교 수학교과서 비교연구", 수학교육, 35(2), pp.143~156 (1996)
  8. 최근배, "한국과 미국의 초등수학 교과서 비교 연구", 수학교육, 44(2), pp.179~200 (2005), 한국수학교육학회
  9. 최창우, "뉴질랜드 초등학교의 포트폴리오 평가에 관한 사례연구 -초등수학을 중심으로-", 수학교육학연구, 18(1), pp.63~80 (2008), 대한수학교육학회
  10. 최창우, "뉴질랜드 초등학교에서의 수지도에서 나타나는 몇 가지 특징에 관한 고찰", 한국초등수학교육학회지, 14(3), pp.843~863 (2010), 한국초등수학교육학회
  11. John Simmons, "Leap into Maths, Year 2 and Year 3" (2006), McGraw ․ Hill
  12. K.M. Vickers, "National Curriculum Mathematics" (2008), Ellenborough House
  13. Ministry of Education, "Mathematics in the New Zealand Curriculum", Ministry of Education by Learning Media Ltd, ~ (2010)
  14. New Zealand Ministry of Education, "Teaching Addition, Subtraction, and Place Value", Draft Teachers' Materials, ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)