최근 10년간 간호학술지에 게재된 질적연구 분석: JKAN과 ANR 중심으로
Analysis of Qualitative Research Published in Nursing Journals in a Recent 10-year Period: Focused on JKAN and ANR
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze reports of qualitative studies published in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (JKAN) and Asian Nursing Research (ANR) and to determine explicit suggestions to improve the quality of qualitative papers. Methods: A total of 106 qualitative studies published in JKAN and ANR from 2008 to 2017 was reviewed using consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). Results: In the research team and reflexivity, there was a lack of description in relationship building with participants and for researcher assumptions. Regarding study design, pilot tests for interview guideline development and revision of a transcript for clarity were less reported than other items. For analysis and findings, descriptions of number of data coders and diverse cases were insufficient. Conclusion: We suggest that researchers consider and describe COREQ items in more detail when reporting qualitative research. Also, although COREQ are guidelines for reporting qualitative studies, they do not reflect the characteristics of all such research methodologies. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a systematic evaluation standard including questions reflecting the characteristics of each qualitative research methodology to contribute to improvement of qualitative research.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze reports of qualitative studies published in Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing (JKAN) and Asian Nursing Research (ANR) and to determine explicit suggestions to improve the quality of qualitative papers. Methods: A total of 106 qualitative studies published in JKAN and ANR from 2008 to 2017 was reviewed using consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ). Results: In the research team and reflexivity, there was a lack of description in relationship building with participants and for researcher assumptions. Regarding study design, pilot tests for interview guideline development and revision of a transcript for clarity were less reported than other items. For analysis and findings, descriptions of number of data coders and diverse cases were insufficient. Conclusion: We suggest that researchers consider and describe COREQ items in more detail when reporting qualitative research. Also, although COREQ are guidelines for reporting qualitative studies, they do not reflect the characteristics of all such research methodologies. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a systematic evaluation standard including questions reflecting the characteristics of each qualitative research methodology to contribute to improvement of qualitative research.
참고문헌 (35)
- Ellen Brantlinger, "Qualitative Studies in Special Education", Exceptional Children, 71(2), pp.195~207 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Kyung Sook Choi, "The Trends of Nursing Research in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Nursing", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 30(5), pp.1207~1218 (2000), Korean Society of Nursing Science (KAMJE)[DOI]
- Corbin, J., "Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory" (2015), Sage
- Creswell, J. W., "Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions" (2007), Sage
- "CASP (Qualitative research) checklist. Qualitative Research Checklist, 31(13), 449" (2017)[URL]
- Mita K. Giacomini, "Users' Guides to the Medical Literature", JAMA, 284(3), pp.357~362 (2000), American Medical Association (AMA)[DOI]
- Guba, E. G., "Effective evaluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches" (1981), Jossey-Bass Publishers
- Danica G. Hays, "Methodological Rigor in Journal of Counseling & Development Qualitative Research Articles: A 15-Year Review", Journal of Counseling & Development, 94(2), pp.172~183 (2016), Wiley[DOI]
- 장성옥, "간호학 지식분류 유형에 따른 대한간호학회지 논문분석- 1년간(2003년 12월호-2004년 10월호) 대한간호학회지 게재논문을 중심으로", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 35(1), pp.206~212 (2005), 한국간호과학회
- 정금희, "대한간호학회지 게재 논문 주요어 분석(2003-2005년)", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 35(8), pp.1420~1425 (2005), 한국간호과학회
- 강현철, "최근 3년간(1999-2001) 대한간호학회지의 통계기법 활용에 대한 분석", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 32(7), pp.929~935 (2002), 한국간호과학회
- 김현수, "남자 간호사의 이직 경험", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 47(1), pp.25~38 (2017), 한국간호과학회
- 김영경, "성인간호학회지(1989-2011)에 게재된 질적 연구의 동향 분석", 성인간호학회지, 23(6), pp.633~641 (2011), 한국성인간호학회
- 곽수영, "말기암 환자의 호스피스 수용 경험: 현상학적 연구", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(6), pp.781~790 (2013), 한국간호과학회
- Larson, E. L., "Publication guidelines need widespread adoption", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(3), pp.239~246 (2012)[DOI]
- 이은주, "여성건강간호학회지에 게재된 질적 연구 보고 분석", 여성건강간호학회지, 18(4), pp.321~332 (2012), 한국여성건강간호학회
- Ingela Lundgren, "‘Groping through the fog’: a metasynthesis of women's experiences on VBAC (Vaginal birth after Caesarean section)", BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12(1), pp.85~96 (2012), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Stefanos Mantzoukas, "The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: A quantitative content analysis", International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(4), pp.479~489 (2009), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Maxwell, J., "Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach" (2013), Sage
- McEwen, M., "Philosophy, science, and nursing. Theoretical basis for nursing" (2007), Lippincott Williams &Wilkins
- Miles, M., "Qualitative data Analysis: An expanded sourcebook" (1994), Sage
- 남경아, "정신간호학 분야의 질적 연구논문분석 - 최근 10년 간 정신간호학회지에 게재된 논문을 중심으로 -", 정신간호학회지, 23(4), pp.311~321 (2014), 한국정신간호학회
- 박형숙, "기본간호학회지에 게재된 질적 연구의 분석", 기본간호학회지, 22(4), pp.442~451 (2015), 기본간호학회[DOI]
- Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative research & evaluation methods" (2015), Sage
- Rao, T. S., "Editorial policies aimed at improving the transparency and validity of published research", Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(3), pp.183~186 (2011)[DOI]
- Rolfe, G., "Validity, trustworthiness, and rigor : Quality and the idea of qualitative research", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, pp.304~310 (2006)[DOI]
- Seale, C., "Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook", pp.251~267 (2000), Sage
- 신현숙, "최근 2년간 Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 게재논문 분석-연구 동향, 실험중재, 연구의 근거등급을 중심으로", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 40(1), pp.139~149 (2010), 한국간호과학회
- Silverman, D., "Interpreting qualitative data: A guide to the principles of qualitative research" (2011), Sage
- Ruth Simpson, "Masculinity at Work", Work, Employment and Society, 18(2), pp.349~368 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- 송은주, "여성 정신분열병 환자의 항정신성 약물 복용 체험", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 41(3), pp.382~392 (2011), 한국간호과학회
- 서연옥, "최근 3년간 대한간호학회지 게재 논문의 동향", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 37(6), pp.1013~1019 (2007), 한국간호과학회
- Tong, A., "Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research(COREQ) : A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups", International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 19(6), pp.349~357 (2007)[DOI]
- 양진향, "암환자의 생활세계 경험", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 38(1), pp.140~151 (2008), 한국간호과학회
- Yi, M. S., "Qualitative research" (2018), Soomoonsa