한의학 관련 질적 연구 현황
Current status of qualitative research related to Korean Medicine
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective : This study examined the status of qualitative research related to Korean Medicine (KM) published until 2020 using Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) and Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) Methods : PubMed and five domestic databases (NDSL(scienceon), DBpia, KISS, RISS, and OASIS) were searched for qualitative research related to KM published until October 2020. The completeness of the reports was assessed using the COREQ and SRQR, which are representative qualitative research reporting tools. Results : After the search and selection process, thirty-nine qualitative studies were included in this study. Since the first publication in 2004, the number of publications increased from 2011 and has been increasing steadily. Approximately 71.8% of the article's data collection methods were only face-to-face interviews. An analysis of the 37 articles using COREQ revealed a report rate for domains one, two, and three of 33.8% (2.7/8), 64% (9.6/15), and 75.4% (7.5/10), respectively. Domain three was the best reported and domain one was the lowest. When the total number of COREQ items was out of 33, there were seven studies with 24 to 31 points (70% or more) and eight studies with 12 to 16 points (50% or less). An analysis of the 39 SRQR showed that the studies were described well in general, but the conflicts of interest and funding sources were insufficiently described. Conclusion : Although the qualitative research related to KM has limitations in terms of the diversity of research institutions, it is increasing steadily. On the other hand, to conduct high-quality qualitative research, it will be necessary to follow checklists accurately, such as COREQ and SRQR.
Abstract
Objective : This study examined the status of qualitative research related to Korean Medicine (KM) published until 2020 using Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) and Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) Methods : PubMed and five domestic databases (NDSL(scienceon), DBpia, KISS, RISS, and OASIS) were searched for qualitative research related to KM published until October 2020. The completeness of the reports was assessed using the COREQ and SRQR, which are representative qualitative research reporting tools. Results : After the search and selection process, thirty-nine qualitative studies were included in this study. Since the first publication in 2004, the number of publications increased from 2011 and has been increasing steadily. Approximately 71.8% of the article's data collection methods were only face-to-face interviews. An analysis of the 37 articles using COREQ revealed a report rate for domains one, two, and three of 33.8% (2.7/8), 64% (9.6/15), and 75.4% (7.5/10), respectively. Domain three was the best reported and domain one was the lowest. When the total number of COREQ items was out of 33, there were seven studies with 24 to 31 points (70% or more) and eight studies with 12 to 16 points (50% or less). An analysis of the 39 SRQR showed that the studies were described well in general, but the conflicts of interest and funding sources were insufficiently described. Conclusion : Although the qualitative research related to KM has limitations in terms of the diversity of research institutions, it is increasing steadily. On the other hand, to conduct high-quality qualitative research, it will be necessary to follow checklists accurately, such as COREQ and SRQR.
참고문헌 (22)
- Pathak V, "Qualitative research", Perspect Clin Res, 4(3), pp.192~ (2013)
- 김선혜, "교통사고 중상자의 한방치료 경험에 대한 질적 연구", 대한한의학회지, 40(2), pp.72~88 (2019), 대한한의학회[DOI]
- Yu KW, "Understanding Qualitative Research Methods" (2018), Pakyoungstory
- Peditto K, "Reporting Qualitative Research : Standards, Challenges, and Implications for Health Design", HERD, 11(2), pp.16~19 (2018)
- 장혜영, "최근 10년간 간호학술지에 게재된 질적연구 분석: JKAN과 ANR 중심으로", 질적연구, 20(2), pp.100~112 (2019), 질적연구학회[DOI]
- 김지연, "국내 상담학 분야의 질적연구 동향 분석: 상담학연구, 상담 및 심리치료학회지 게재논문 분석(2013년~2017년)", 질적탐구, 4(2), pp.131~168 (2018), 한국질적탐구학회[DOI]
- 강은희, "국내 생물교육 분야의 질적 연구 동향- 「생물교육」 학회지를 중심으로 -", 생물교육, 47(4), pp.411~421 (2019), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- 김현진, "국내 교육공학 질적 연구 동향 분석", 교육공학연구, 34(2), pp.309~344 (2018), 한국교육공학회[DOI]
- 이승환, "국내 한의학 학회지에 게재된 질적 연구 보고 분석", 동의신경정신과학회지, 27(2), pp.77~87 (2016), 대한한방신경정신과학회
- Tong A, "Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research(COREQ) : a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups", Int J Qual Health Care, 19(6), pp.349~357 (2007)
- "EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research)"[URL]
- O Brien BC, "Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research : A Synthesis of Recommendations", Academic medicine, 89(9), pp.1245~1251 (2014)
- 한미라, "사상체질별 어머니의 양육행동에 관한 질적 연구", 생태유아교육연구, 3(1), pp.71~102 (2004), 한국생태유아교육학회
- Keum JH, "(The)physical predispositions of the students and mathematical conceptual structure", pp.2006
- 이향숙, "만성 요통 환자의 침 치료 경험 : 질적 연구", Korean Journal of Acupuncture, 27(2), pp.183~201 (2010), 경락경혈학회
- Jeong HC, "A Research Study on the Utilizing Status and Demand of Oriental Medical Equipment by Korean Medicine Doctor", pp.2011
- Son JH, "Study on Improvements in Health Insurance Coverage of Herbal Medicine Products : With focus on the comparison of the foreign system and in-depth interview with experts", pp.2012
- Kim EH, "Preference and Satisfaction of Cancer Patients Who Seek for Cancer Treatment of Korean Medicine(KM)", pp.2013
- 유민희, "한‧양방 협진 코디네이터의 실무경험 : 질적 연구", 대한예방한의학회지, 15(3), pp.83~99 (2011), 대한예방한의학회
- 김송이, "만성 요통 환자의 침 치료 경험(2): 질적 연구 - 무작위 대조군 연구 피험자를 대상으로", Korean Journal of Acupuncture, 29(4), pp.581~597 (2012), 경락경혈학회
- 문아지, "고혈압-뜸 임상시험 참여자들의 혈압 관리행동에 대한 질적연구", 대한한방내과학회지, 33(4), pp.543~557 (2012), 대한한방내과학회
- 조아람, "북한이탈주민들의 병증발생시기 인식에 대한 질적 연구", 동의신경정신과학회지, 24(4), pp.373~384 (2013), 대한한방신경정신과학회