여성건강간호학회지에 게재된 질적 연구 보고 분석
Analysis on Reports of Qualitative Researches Published in Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This research was aimed to analyze the reports of qualitative researches published in Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN). Methods: Twenty qualitative researches using in-depth interviews or focus groups published in KJWHN during from 2002 to 2011 were selected for analysis. Selected reports were analyzed by consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ), which were a reporting guideline for qualitative researches,and consisted of thirty two items and three domains, i.e., (1) research team and reflexivity, (2) study design,and (3) data analysis and reporting. Results: Personal characteristics related to credentials, gender and interviewer's bias or assumption were less reported than other items in the 1st domain. In the 2nd domain, descriptions such as a presence of non-participants, pilot test for interview guide development, and transcript return to participants were less reported than other items. In the 3rd domain, items related to number of data coder, participants checking of the finding, and clarity of minor themes were less reported than other items. Conclusion: It could be concluded that COREQ is a useful guideline for reporting of qualitative studies. From these results, we suggest that full items of COREQ should be considered and described when researchers report qualitative research.
Abstract
Purpose: This research was aimed to analyze the reports of qualitative researches published in Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN). Methods: Twenty qualitative researches using in-depth interviews or focus groups published in KJWHN during from 2002 to 2011 were selected for analysis. Selected reports were analyzed by consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ), which were a reporting guideline for qualitative researches,and consisted of thirty two items and three domains, i.e., (1) research team and reflexivity, (2) study design,and (3) data analysis and reporting. Results: Personal characteristics related to credentials, gender and interviewer's bias or assumption were less reported than other items in the 1st domain. In the 2nd domain, descriptions such as a presence of non-participants, pilot test for interview guide development, and transcript return to participants were less reported than other items. In the 3rd domain, items related to number of data coder, participants checking of the finding, and clarity of minor themes were less reported than other items. Conclusion: It could be concluded that COREQ is a useful guideline for reporting of qualitative studies. From these results, we suggest that full items of COREQ should be considered and described when researchers report qualitative research.
참고문헌 (16)
- Byrne, M. M., "Evaluating the finding of qualitative research", Association of Operating Room Nurses Journal, 73(3), pp.703~706 (2001)
- 조동숙, "Analysis on Reports of Statistical Testings for Correlation and Regression", 여성건강간호학회지, 14(3), pp.213~220 (2008), 여성건강간호학회
- 정재원, "차이검정을 이용한 논문의 통계활용 분석", 여성건강간호학회지, 13(3), pp.211~218 (2007), 여성건강간호학회
- Cote, L., "Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education", Medical Teacher, 27, pp.71~5 (2005)
- Fossey, E., "Understanding and evaluating qualitative research", The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36, pp.717~732 (2002)
- Franciosi, J. P., "Development of a validated patient-reported symptom metric for pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis : qualitative methods", BMC Gastoenterology, 11, pp.126~138 (2011)
- 전은미, "여성건강간호학회지에 게재된 차이검정을 이용한 논문의 통계활용 분석", 여성건강간호학회지, 17(4), pp.388~394 (2011), 여성건강간호학회
- Kim, G. B., "Qualitative research methodology" (2005), Hyunmoonsa
- 김증임, "여성건강간호학회지의 최근 3년간의 논문분석 (2007-2009년)", 여성건강간호학회지, 16(3), pp.307~316 (2010), 여성건강간호학회
- 김증임, "여성건강간호학회지의 최근 3년간의 논문분석(2004-2006년)", 여성건강간호학회지, 13(1), pp.51~59 (2007), 여성건강간호학회
- Larson, E. L., "Publication guidelines need widespread adoption", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65, pp.239~246 (2012)
- 이은주, "최근 3년간(2007~2009년) 여성건강간호학회지의 상관분석과 회귀분석 통계활용 논문 분석", 여성건강간호학회지, 17(2), pp.187~194 (2011), 여성건강간호학회
- Rao, T. S., "Editorial policies aimed at improving the transparency and validity of published research", Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 53, pp.183~186 (2011)
- Shin, K. L., "Qualitative Research Methodology" (2004), Ewha Womans University Press
- Tamminga, S. J., "Breast cancer survivors' views of factors that influence the return-to-work process-a qualitative study", Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 38, pp.144~154 (2012)
- Tong, A., "Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research(COREQ) : A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus group", International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 1, pp.349~357 (2007)