<楚亭集序>에 나타난 연암의 法古創新論 연구

Abstract

This thesis analyzed <Chojeongjibseo(楚亭集序)> in terms of syntax and as a prose. It was specified into 5 parts. First of all, the full text was classified into 5 paragraphs and each paragraph was systemized according to the content. <Chojeongjibseo(楚亭集序)>, differing from other forewords, implies literary opinion of Yoenahm. Especially, two thirds of the foreword is about syntax. It shows the process of finding meeting point of ‘Following older literature(法古)’ and ‘Making new literature(創新)’. Yeonahm points out that both ‘Following older literature’ and ‘Making new literature’ have problems by showing the example of Wangmang and Yanghwa, Sangang and Leeyeonnyeon. As a conclusive proposition, he asserted that it has to be the syntax of ‘Beobgoijibyeon(法古而知變), Changshinineungjeon(刱新而能典)’. In the opinion of this thesis, it sees this process to proposition similar to Mādhyamaka-Śāstra(中道論) of Nagarjuna(龍樹). That is, there is no contradiction between ‘Following older literature’ and ‘Making new literature’. Rather, they implies elements of each other. Accordingly, by integrating two, the proposition can be derived. Also, to clarify the meaning of ‘Change(變)’ and ‘Custom(典)’ which has not been handled importantly in pre-researches. specific analysis was conducted. Meanwhile, by understanding Gongmyeongseon․Rho's man as examples of ‘Beobgoijibyeon(法古而知變)’, Hoeeumhu․Wooseunggyeong as examples of ‘Changshinineungjeon(刱新而能典)’, I indicate a problem about four examples of advanced research. In the next paragraph, elements which Yeonahm has listed, heaven and earth, books and nature, and courtesy and music(禮樂)․writings and paintings(書圖)․Inji(仁智) etc were understood as reasons to ‘Beobgoijibyeon(法古而知變)’, Sage of 100 Century․Sunu's born again were analyzed as reasons to ‘Changshinineungjeon(刱新而能典)’. Ujik and Ahnhoe's narrow-mindedness and rudeness are though as returning to the first paragraph which implies that ancient literature and current literature are the same because of meeting point of both method. In other words, ‘Custom’ is artistic value or mind of ancient literature, which shares the same goal with ‘Change'. On the other hand, Yeonahm referred that this foreword is actual example of ’Making new rules’-pursuing work. The last two paragraph is about appreciating the work of Chojeong, which makes it possess the form of common foreword. The descriptive structure of <Chojeongjibseo(楚亭集序)>follows inductive method. It gets the propositions of ‘Beobgoijibyeon(法古而知變), Changshinineungjeon(刱新而能典)’, and proves these propositions by making use of actual examples and theoretical reasons. It shows the structure of pyramid which the conclusive proposition is supported by other elements. The pattern of thinking and structure which appears in <Chojeongjibseo(楚亭集序)> was for practical attitude which denies all the stereotypes, a strong will about truth, and desire to actualize changes.