본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

“Culture and Development" in South Korea and Japan's Official Development Assistance:The Interplay between International Norms and Domestic Ideas

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

The global community has recognized the significance of culture, especially its functions and values, in the context of development; however, it remains unclear how developed countries support the promotion of culture in partner countries. This is mainly due to the gaps in the literature concerning this field. In addition, when literature on foreign aid states culture, it generally meant cultures in a donor country or the cultural aspect of a donor’s diplomacy rather than the diversity of culture or local cultures in developing countries. In order to fill this gap in the literature, this article examines the culture-centered Official Development Assistance (ODA) programs adopted by South Korea and Japan. To this end, we present an overview of the common features and characteristics of the culture-centered ODA programs implemented by Japan and South Korea and analyzes two ODA projects: the Kaman-Kalehöyük Archaeological Museum in Turkey by Japan and the National Museum in the Democratic Republic of Congo by South Korea. The analysis shows that the interplay between cultural norms in the context of development and pre-existing domestic ideas about development determine the ways in which Japan and South Korea implement culture-centered ODA programs. The pre-existing domestic ideas are shaped by their experience in the field of development as well as their national identities. In addition, it shows how Japan and South Korea have provided cultural ODA in pursuit of national interests as a means to strengthen their soft power.

Abstract

The global community has recognized the significance of culture, especially its functions and values, in the context of development; however, it remains unclear how developed countries support the promotion of culture in partner countries. This is mainly due to the gaps in the literature concerning this field. In addition, when literature on foreign aid states culture, it generally meant cultures in a donor country or the cultural aspect of a donor’s diplomacy rather than the diversity of culture or local cultures in developing countries. In order to fill this gap in the literature, this article examines the culture-centered Official Development Assistance (ODA) programs adopted by South Korea and Japan. To this end, we present an overview of the common features and characteristics of the culture-centered ODA programs implemented by Japan and South Korea and analyzes two ODA projects: the Kaman-Kalehöyük Archaeological Museum in Turkey by Japan and the National Museum in the Democratic Republic of Congo by South Korea. The analysis shows that the interplay between cultural norms in the context of development and pre-existing domestic ideas about development determine the ways in which Japan and South Korea implement culture-centered ODA programs. The pre-existing domestic ideas are shaped by their experience in the field of development as well as their national identities. In addition, it shows how Japan and South Korea have provided cultural ODA in pursuit of national interests as a means to strengthen their soft power.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?, "Alesina, A.", National Bureau of Economic Research, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper No. 6612 (1998)
  2. (2016)[URL]
  3. Bandarin, F., "Why Development Needs Culture", Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 1(1), pp.15~25 (2011)
  4. Cortell, A. P., "When Norms Clash : International Norms, Domestic Practices, and Japan’s Internalisation of the GATT", WTO, 2005, pp.31(1), 3~25
  5. Cortell, A. P., "Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms : A Research Agenda", International Studies Review, 2(1), pp.65~87 (2000)
  6. "DAC Statistical Reporting Directives. 40/REV1" (2010)[URL]
  7. Dollar, D., "The Increasing Selectivity of Foreign Aid, 1984-2003", World Development, 34(12), pp.2034~2046 (2006)
  8. "2000", 140
  9. Enoki, Yasukuni, (1999), Maruzen
  10. Finnemore, M., "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change", International Organization, 52(4), pp.887~917 (1998)
  11. (2008)[URL]
  12. (2015)[URL]
  13. (2005)[URL]
  14. Kim, Kwang-su, "Project for the Establishment of a National Museum in the DRC and Korea’s New ODA Strategy: The Contextualization of the DRC’s History and Culture", African and Asian Studies, 15(4), pp.408~442 (2016)
  15. "KOICA", KOICA, ~ (2011)
  16. (2017)[URL]
  17. Lancaster, C., "Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics" (2007), The University of Chicago Press
  18. Lumsdaine, D. H., "Moral Vision in International Politics: the foreign aid regime 1949-1989" (1989), Princeton University Press
  19. Mazrui, A. A., "Cultural Forces in World Politics" (1990), James Currey
  20. Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, (2010), South Korea Culture & Tourism Institute
  21. (2015)[URL]
  22. MOFA of Japan, "White Paper on Development Cooperation 2015" (2015), MOFA
  23. (2013)[URL]
  24. MOFA of Japan, "Japan’s ODA White Paper 2011" (2012), MOFA
  25. MOFA of Japan, "Japan’s ODA White Paper 2008" (2009), MOFA
  26. MOFA of Japan, (2003), MOFA
  27. "International Cooperation" (2017)[URL]
  28. Nye, JR., J. S., "Soft Power: the Means to Success in World Politics" (2004), Public Affairs
  29. (2009)[URL]
  30. "Office for Government Policy Coordination", Office for Government Policy Coordination, ~ (2016)
  31. Ohno, Izumi., "Eastern and Western Ideas for African Growth: Diversity and Complementarity in Development Aid", pp.1~29 (2013), Routledge
  32. Porter, G., "Culture and Development in a Globalizing World", pp.150~169 (2006), Routledge
  33. Radcliffe, S, "Culture and Development in a Globalizing World", pp.1~29 (2006), Routledge
  34. Schraeder J., "Clarifying the Foreign Aid puzzle: A Comparison of American, Japanese, French, and Swedish Aid Flows", World Politics, 50(2), pp.294~323 (1998)
  35. Sims, K, "Culture, Community-oriented Learning and the Post-2015 Development Agenda: A View from Laos", Third World Quarterly, 36(10), pp.1922~1943 (2015)
  36. Söderberg, M, "Challenging the Aid Paradigm: Western Currents and Asian Alternatives", pp.107~137 (2010), Pargrave Macmillan
  37. (2016)[URL]
  38. Western Middle Powers and Global Poverty: The Determinants of the Aid Policies of Canada, Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden, "Stokke, O.", the Scandinavian Institute for African Studies, ~ (1989)
  39. Sugimoto, Sho, "Construction Process and Expectation of Kaman Kale Hoyuk Archaeological Museum in Turkey", Summaries of technical papers of Annual Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan. E-2, Architectural planning and design II, Dwelling houses and housing sites, rural planning, education, pp.653~654 (2011)
  40. Takahashi, Yutaka, "The evolution of cultural diplomacy that supported the modernization of Japan" (2015), Fukumura Shuppan
  41. (2010)[URL]
  42. "Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. A/70/L.1" (2015)[URL]
  43. "World Conference on Cultural Policies, Mexico City, 26 July-6 August 1982" (1982)[URL]
  44. "UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity: a vision a conceptual platform, a pool of ideas for implementation, a new paradigm" (2001)[URL]
  45. Vlassis, A, "Culture in the Post-2015 Development Agenda: the Anatomy of an International Mobilisation", Third World Quarterly, 36(9), pp.1649~1662 (2015)
  46. Wendt, A, "Social Theory of International Politics" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  47. ". The Korean National Assembly Agenda No. 176075" (2007)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)