본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

안보목표 실현을 위한 아세안의 제도적 전략 : ADMM-Plus를 중심으로

Institutional Strategies for Realizing ASEAN Security Goals : Focusing on the ADMM-Plus

이숙연
한국아시아학회 (The Korean Association Of Asian Studies(Kaas))|2021.11|아시아연구 (The Journal of Asian Studies)|제24권 제4호|pp. 153-170|DOI 10.21740/jas.2021.11.24.4.153

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

ASEAN아세안아세안 중심성제도적 전략Institutional StrategyASEAN security cooperationASEAN CentralityADMM-Plus아세안 안보협력아세안 확대국방장관회의(ADMM-Plus)
주제분류지역학

초록

2000년대 이후 심화되는 미·중 패권 경쟁 속에서 아세안이 아시아-태평양 지역의 제도적 아키텍처 형성에 주도적 역할을 한다는 것은 주지의 사실이다. 아세안이 국제정치 및 지역주의에서 어떻게 중심적 역할을 수행하는가에 대해 지역 안보의 구조적 조건과 결부하여 설명하기도 하지만, 아세안이 의식적이며 전략적인 제도화를 통해 ‘아세안 중심성’이라는 안보목표를 추구해왔다고 보는 것이 더욱 적절하다. 본 논문은 이러한 관점하에 아세안 확대국방장관회의(ADMM-Plus) 사례를 통해 다자 안보협력을 제도적으로 구상·설계·변화·발전시킨 과정 그 자체가 아세안의 안보목표인 중심성 유지를 실현하기 위한 제도적 대응 전략임을 밝히고, 아세안 중심의 안보협력에 대한 전망을 바탕으로 한국에 대한 정책적 함의를 논의한다.

Abstract

It is a well-known fact that ASEAN plays a leading role in the formation of institutional architecture in the Asia-Pacific region amid intensifying competition for US-China hegemony since the 2000s. Some explain how ASEAN plays a central role in international politics and regionalism in connection with the structural conditions of regional security, but it is more appropriate to regard ASEAN as pursuing the security goal of “ASEAN Centrality” through conscious and strategic institutionalization. From this point of view, this paper argues that ASEAN has responded strategically to the regional security environment through the launching, institutional design, and evolution of ADMM-Plus to realize ASEAN's security goal, "ASEAN Centrality“, rather than simply responding to the structural conditions of the regional security environment. And It discusses policy implications for Korea based on the prospects for ASEAN-centered security cooperation.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 이신화, "지역다자주의 틀에서의 미-중 경쟁과 한국의 다자안보전략구상: ‘아세안 중심성’(ASEAN Centrality)의 교훈", 담론201, 20(2), pp.105~141 (2017), 한국사회역사학회[DOI]
  2. 이동준, "지역안보복합체(RSC) 이론과 동북아시아 지역연구", 국제.지역연구, 22(2), pp.1~28 (2013), 국제학연구소
  3. Adler, E., "Security communities (No. 62)" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  4. Asian Regional Institutions and the Possibilities for Socializing the Behavior of States, "Acharya, A.", Asian Development Bank, ~, pp.Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration 82 (2011)
  5. Acharya, A, "The myth of ASEAN centrality?", Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 39(2), pp.273~279 (2017)
  6. Concept Paper for the Establishment of an ADMM, "ADMM", ~ (2006)
  7. Concept Paper on ADMM-Plus, "ADMM", ~ (2007)
  8. Concept Paper on ADMM-Plus Principles for Membership, "ADMM", ~ (2009)
  9. Concept Paper on ADMM-Plus Configuration and Composition, "ADMM", ~ (2010)
  10. Concept Paper on ADMM-Plus Modalities and Procedure, "ADMM", ~ (2010)
  11. Joint Declaration of the ASEAN Defence Ministers on Strengthening ASEAN Defence Cooperation for Stability and Development of the Region, "ADMM", ~ (2010)
  12. Additional Protocol to the Concept Papers on the Establishment of an ADMM and the ADMM-Plus, "ADMM", ~ (2014)
  13. Guidelines to Respond to Request for Informal Engagements or Meetings by the ADMM Plus Countries, "ADMM", ~ (2015)
  14. Concept Paper on Annualisation of ADMM-Plus, "ADMM", ~ (2017)
  15. Guidelines Regarding the Conduct of ADMM’s Informal Engagements or Meetings with Plus Countries, "ADMM", ~ (2017)
  16. Concept Paper on Developing the Linkage between the ADMM and the ASEAN Chiefs of Defence Forces Meeting, "ADMM", ~ (2020)
  17. Concept Paper on the ADMM’s External Engagements, "ADMM", ~ (2021)
  18. Post-Implementation Review on the Annualisation of the ADMM-Plus, "ADMM", ~ (2021)
  19. Arase, D, "Non-traditional security in China-ASEAN cooperation: The institutionalization of regional security cooperation and the evolution of East Asian regionalism", Asian Survey, 50(4), pp.808~833 (2010)
  20. Ba, Alice D, "Who is socializing whom? Complex engagement in Sino-ASEAN relations", The Pacifc Review, 19(2), pp.157~179 (2006)
  21. Ba, Alice D., "Building ASEAN community political–security and socio-cultural refections", pp.146~157 (2017), Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia
  22. Reflections on defence security in East Asia, "Ball, D", RISI, ~, pp.RSIS Working Paper, No. 237 (2012)
  23. Caballero-Anthony, M, "Understanding ASEAN's centrality: bases and prospects in an evolving regional architecture", The Pacific Review, 27(4), pp.563~584 (2014)
  24. Caouette, D. A., "Rife for a New Asian Multilateralism? Asean and Contemporary Regional Dynamics", European Journal of East Asian Studies, 10(1), pp.5~36 (2011)
  25. Capie, D., "The Shangri-La Dialogue and the institutionalization of defence diplomacy in Asia", The Pacific Review, 23(3), pp.359~376 (2010)
  26. Checkel, Jefrey T, "International Institutions and Socialization in Europe : Introduction and Frame work", International Organization, 59(4), pp.801~826 (2005)
  27. Chiang, C. F., "Insights on the ADMM and ADMM-plus: The road to realisation, and what lies ahead", Goh Keng Swee Command and Staff College Seminar (2014)
  28. Emmers, R., "The East Asia Summit and the regional security architecture", Maryland series in contemporary Asian studies, 2010(3), pp.1~54 (2010)
  29. Roundtable on the Future of The ADMM, "ADMM-Plus and Defence Diplomacy in the Asia Pacific, RSIS Policy Report", Gindarsih, I, 2016
  30. Goh, E, "Institutions and the great power bargain in East Asia: ASEAN's limited ‘brokerage’role", International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(3), pp.373~401 (2011)
  31. Goh, E, "The struggle for order: Hegemony, hierarchy, and transition in post-cold war East Asia" (2013), Oxford University Press
  32. Haacke, J, "The concept of hedging and its application to Southeast Asia : a critique and a proposal for a modified conceptual and methodological framework", International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 19(3), pp.375~417 (2019)
  33. He, Kai, "Institutional Balancing and International Relations Theory : Economic Interdependence and Balance of Power Strategies in Southeast Asia", European Journal of International Relations, 14(3), pp.489~518 (2008)
  34. Johnston, A. I, "Treating international institutions as social environments", International studies quarterly, 45(4), pp.487~515 (2001)
  35. Khong, Y. F, "Rethinking Security in East Asia: Identity Power and Efciency", pp.172~208 (2004), Stanford University Press
  36. SAF and Other Militaries Conclude the ADMM-Plus HA, "DR", MM Exercise, pp.2013, ~
  37. "The U.S. Military Presence in the Asia-Pacific 2020" (2020)[URL]
  38. Kuik, C. C, "How do weaker states hedge? Unpacking ASEAN states’ alignment behavior towards China", Journal of Contemporary China, 25(100), pp.500~514 (2016)
  39. Shekhar, V, "ASEAN’s response to the rise of China: Deploying a hedging strategy", China Report, 48(3), pp.253~268 (2012)
  40. Sukma, R, "Cooperative security in the Asia-Pacific: the ASEAN regional forum", pp.127~139 (2010), Routledge
  41. Stubbs, R, "ASEAN's leadership in East Asian region-building: strength in weakness", The Pacific Review, 27(4), pp.523~541 (2014)
  42. The Straits Times, "MH370: Straits Times Web Special Highlights Sea and Air Assets Used in Hunt", ~ (2014)
  43. National security strategy of the United States of America, "The White House", ~ (2017)
  44. United States Strategic Approach to The People’s Republic of China, "The White House", ~ (2020)
  45. Tow, W. T., "What is Asian security architecture?", Review of International Studies, 36(1), pp.95~116 (2010)
  46. Yates, R, "ASEAN as the ‘regional conductor’: understanding ASEAN's role in Asia-Pacific order", The Pacific Review, 30(4), pp.443~461 (2017)
  47. "Chinese Defense Minister Calls for Practical Cooperation in Boosting Ties with ASEAN"[URL]
  48. "New Asian Security Concept For New Progress in Security Cooperation"[URL]
  49. "Remarks by H.E. Li Keqiang Premier of the State Council of the People's Republic of China At the 16th ASEAN-China"[URL]
  50. "Speech to Indonesian Parliament. ASEAN-China Centre"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

미·중 경쟁 시대 '아세안 중심성' 확보를 위한 군사협력 발전 현황과 원인 분석이숙연국제학연구소 · 국제학논총2020 · 제32권 지역다자주의 틀에서의 미-중 경쟁과 한국의 다자안보전략구상: ‘아세안 중심성’(ASEAN Centrality)의 교훈이신화, 이양호한국사회역사학회 · 담론2012017 · 제20권 제2호미중 갈등은 아세안 중심성(ASEAN Centrality)을 약화시키는가?: 아세안 중심성 개념에 대한 비판적 고찰을 중심으로유현석극동문제연구소 · 한국과 국제정치2024 · 제40권 제3호아세안 정치안보공동체(APSC) 진전과 군사협력 발전이숙연동아시아국제정치학회 · 국제정치연구2020 · 제23권 제4호소다자주의(minilateralism)가 아세안중심성 (ASEAN Centrality)에 미치는 영향: 한국의 대 아세안 협력 전략에 관한 시사점을 중심으로김동엽한국동남아학회 · 동남아시아연구2023 · 제33권 제3호아세안(ASEAN)의 인도·태평양 전략에 관한 고찰 : AOIP를 중심으로박혜원, 유인태, 이진영한국국회학회 · 한국과 세계2024 · 제6권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)

Empirical Research on Behavioral Intention to Adopt Mobile Commerce Integrating UTAUT in Pakistan김창수, Muhammad Awais, Jafar Alipp. 1-30A Critical Analysis of India’s National Education Policy 2020: Focusing on Higher EducationKUMAR SRIJANpp. 31-44인도-파키스탄 분립 과정에 나타난 무슬림 진영의 경제적 인식: 전인도무슬림상공회의소연합의 설립과 초창기 활동을 중심으로 1940-1947신민하pp. 45-64산업연관분석을 이용한 중국의 산업 및 기술구조 변화요인 분석최용재, 왕춘뢰pp. 65-86중국의 거대 플랫폼에 대한 반독점과 데이터 독점 규제: 알리바바 사례를 중심으로이중희pp. 87-102
원문 보기