장애와 손상의 구분을 중심으로 본 장애의 모델들: 장애에 대한 다원적 접근의 필요성
Beyond Models of Disability: Conceptual Engineering and a Pluralistic Approach to Disability
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The conceptualization of disability is not merely a descriptive issue but also a normative one, as the way disability is viewed can fundamentally shift the focus of what constitutes ethically appropriate support for disabled people. This paper reviews the historical debates surrounding models of disability over the past several decades, arguing that each model is a product of conceptual engineering, developed in response to normative needs related to disability. Given the persistent conflicts between these models, we propose a "pluralistic approach to disability" as a solution to the deadlock between them. It is argued that the conceptualization of disability does not require adopting a single stance among conflicting models; rather, by employing a pluralistic approach as part of strategic conceptual engineering, it becomes possible to more effectively address the diverse normative demands surrounding disability
Abstract
The conceptualization of disability is not merely a descriptive issue but also a normative one, as the way disability is viewed can fundamentally shift the focus of what constitutes ethically appropriate support for disabled people. This paper reviews the historical debates surrounding models of disability over the past several decades, arguing that each model is a product of conceptual engineering, developed in response to normative needs related to disability. Given the persistent conflicts between these models, we propose a "pluralistic approach to disability" as a solution to the deadlock between them. It is argued that the conceptualization of disability does not require adopting a single stance among conflicting models; rather, by employing a pluralistic approach as part of strategic conceptual engineering, it becomes possible to more effectively address the diverse normative demands surrounding disability
참고문헌 (68)
- Goldiner A, "Understanding"disability"as a cluster of disability models", J Philos Disabil, 2, pp.28~54 (2022)[DOI]
- Wendell, S, "The rejected body: feminist philosophical reflections on disability" (1996), Routledge
- Barnes E, "The minority body : a theory of disability" (2016), Oxford University Press
- Oliver M, "The politics of disablement : a sociological approach" (1990), Palgrave Macmillan
- Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation (UPIAS), "Fundamental principles of disability", UPIAS, ~ (1976)
- Barnes C, "Disability reader: social science perspectives" (1998), Continuum
- Priestley M, "Constructions and creations : idealism, materialism and disability theory", Disabil Soc, 13(1), pp.75~94 (1998)[DOI]
- Crilley, M., "Material disability: creating new paths for disability studies", CEA Critic, 78(3), pp.306~311 (2016)[DOI]
- Smith SR, "Arguing about disability:philosophical perspectives" (2008), Routledge
- Harris J, "Is there a coherent social conception of disability?", J Med Ethics, 26(2), pp.95~100 (2000)[DOI]
- Finkelstein V, "Attitudes and disabled people: issues for discussion" (1980), World Rehabilitation Fund
- Barnes C, "Disabled people in Britain and discrimination: a case for anti-discrimination legislation" (1991), C. Hurst & Company
- Mason M, "Disability equality in education" (1990), ILEA
- Haslanger S, "The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy" (2024), Stanford University
- Sveinsdóttir Á, "Social construction", Philos Compass, 10(12), pp.884~892 (2015)[DOI]
- Haslanger S, ""But mom, crop-tops are cute!" : social knowledge, social structure and ideology critique", Philos Issues, 17(1), pp.70~91 (2007)[DOI]
- Scott RA, "The making of blind men : a study of adult socialization" (1969), New York Association for the Blind
- Garland-Thomson R, "Extraordinary bodies : figuring physical disability in American culture and literature" (1997), Columbia University Press
- Swain J, "Towards an affirmation model of disability", Disabil Soc, 15(4), pp.569~582 (2000)[DOI]
- Cameron C, "Whose problem? : disability narratives and available identities", Community Dev J, 42(4), pp.501~511 (2007)[DOI]
- Shakespeare T, "Disability rights and wrongs" (2006), Routledge
- Kafer A, "Feminist, queer, crip" (2013), Indiana University Press
- Oliver M, "Understanding disability: from theory to practice" (1996), Macmillan Publishers Limited
- Penson WJ, "Madness, distress and the politics of disablement" (2015), Policy Press
- Howard D, "On valuing impairment", Philos Stud, 175, pp.1113~1133 (2018)[DOI]
- Tremain, S., "On the government of disability", Soc Theory Pract, 27(4), pp.617~636 (2001)
- Beaudry JS, "Beyond(models of)disability?", J Med Philos Forum Bioeth Philos Med, 41(2), pp.210~228 (2016)[DOI]
- Terzi L, "The social model of disability : a philosophical critique", J Appl Philos, 21(2), pp.141~157 (2004)[DOI]
- Hirschmann NJ, "Disability and political theory", pp.99~122 (2016), Cambridge University Press
- Hughes B, "Disability studies today" (2002), Polity Press
- Morris J, "Impairment and disability : constructing an ethics of care that promotes human rights", Hypatia, 16(4), pp.1~16 (2001)[DOI]
- Thomas C, "Disability studies today", pp.38~57 (2002), Polity Press
- Clare E, "Stolen bodies, reclaimed bodies : disability and queerness", Publ Cult, 13(3), pp.359~366 (2001)[DOI]
- Thomas C, "Female forms: experiencing and understanding disability" (1999), Open University Press
- Thomas C, "New directions in the sociology of chronic and disabling conditions: assaults on the lifeworld" (2010), Palgrave Macmillan
- Amundson R, "Bioethics and disability rights : conflicting values and perspectives", J Bioeth Inq, 5(2, pp.3) (2008), 111~123
- Jenkins K, "Disability, impairment, and marginalised functioning", Australas J Philos, 99(4), pp.730~747 (2021)[DOI]
- Crow L, "Encounters with strangers: feminism and disability" (1996), Women’s Press
- Silvers A, "On the possibility and desirability of constructing a neutral conception of disability", Theor Med Bioeth, 24(6), pp.471~487 (2003)[DOI]
- Trautmann J, "Can we resurrect Apollo?", Lit Med, 1(1), pp.1~18 (1982)[DOI]
- Hwang I, "Medicine and narrative", pp.2011
- Kleinman A, "The illness narratives" (1988), Basic Books
- Frank AW, "At the will of the body : reflections on illness" (1991), Houghton Mifflin Company
- Frank AW, "The wounded storyteller: body, illness, and ethics" (1995), University of Chicago Press
- Charon R, "The patient-physician relationship. Narrative medicine : a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust", JAMA, 286(15), pp.1897~1902 (2001)
- Charon R, "The principles and practice of narrative medicine" (2016), Oxford University Press
- Morris J, "Feminism and disability", Fem Rev, 43(1), pp.57~70 (1993)[DOI]
- Finkelstein V, "Outside, ‘inside out’", Coalition, pp.30~36 (1996)
- Oliver M, "The social model of disability : thirty years on", Disabil Soc, 28(7), pp.1024~1026 (2013)[DOI]
- Creath R, "Dear Carnap, dear Van: the Quine-Carnap correspondence and related work" (1990), University of California Press
- Cappelen H, "Fixing language: an essay on conceptual engineering" (2018), Oxford University Press
- Choi S, "Another defence of being victim-like : natural kinds, conceptual engineering, and being victim-like", Seoul Law J, 62(2), pp.1~38 (2021)[DOI]
- Haslanger S, "Resisting reality: social construction and social critique" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Eklund M, "Metasemantics: new essays on the foundations of meaning" (2014), Oxford University Press
- Cappelen H, "Conceptual engineering and conceptual ethics" (2020), Oxford University Press
- Cantalamessa EA, "Disability studies, conceptual engineering, and conceptual activism", Inquiry, 64(1-2), pp.46~75 (2021)[DOI]
- Linton S, "Claiming disability: knowledge and identity" (1998), New York University Press
- Silvers A, "Philosophical reflections on disability" (2010), Springer
- Siebers T, "Disability theory" (2008), University of Michigan Press
- Beaudry JS, "The Oxford handbook of philosophy and disability" (2019), Oxford University Press
- Haslanger S, "Resisting reality:social construction and social critique" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Chalmers DJ, "Verbal disputes", Philos Rev, 120(4), pp.515~566 (2011)[DOI]
- Brigandt I, "Conceptual engineering and conceptual ethics" (2020), Oxford University Press
- Beresford P, "Towards a social model of madness and distress?: exploring what service users say" (2010), Joseph Rowntree Foundation
- Ásta, "Categories we live by: the construction of sex, gender, race, and other social categories" (2018), Oxford University Press
- Jenkins K, "Ontology and oppression: race, gender, and social reality" (2023), Oxford University Press
- Mason R, "Rejecting the"implicit consensus" : a reply to Jenkins", Thought J Philos, 9(2), pp.140~147 (2020)[DOI]
- Haslanger S, "Resisting reality:social construction and social critique" (2012), Oxford University Press