ปรากฏการณ์พหุนัยของคำว่า “กิน” ในภาษาไทย : การศึกษาตามแนวภาษาศาสตร์ปริชาน
A Cognitive Linguistic Study on the Polysemous Verb “KIN (‘to eat’)” in Thai
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to analyze the aspects of meaning extensions and conceptualization of the polysemous verb, “KIN (to eat)”, from a cognitive linguistic perspective. In this study, various concepts of cognitive linguistics are applied in the analysis, including prototype theory, image schema, and conceptual metaphors and windowing. The linguistic data used in the study is collected from the Thai National Corpus. The result of the study shows that the prototypical meaning, i.e. the most salient meaning, comes from the bodily experience of consuming food. The act of consumption is comprised of three steps: Step of getting or taking, Step of occupation, and Step of consumption & production of Energy, and each step become the basis of various meaning extensions. This study also analyzes negative implications of the Thai verb, KIN. The negative implications are found to be based on metaphorical concepts, EATING IS EGOISTIC ACTION and EATING IS GETTING OUT OF THE MIDDLE WAY. This study helps to understand the cognitive mechanism of polysemy and grammaticalization by presenting the motivation behind conceptualization of the prototypical meaning of the polysemous verb “KIN.” We hope for this study to contribute in both cognitive linguistics and teaching Thai as a foreign language.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the aspects of meaning extensions and conceptualization of the polysemous verb, “KIN (to eat)”, from a cognitive linguistic perspective. In this study, various concepts of cognitive linguistics are applied in the analysis, including prototype theory, image schema, and conceptual metaphors and windowing. The linguistic data used in the study is collected from the Thai National Corpus. The result of the study shows that the prototypical meaning, i.e. the most salient meaning, comes from the bodily experience of consuming food. The act of consumption is comprised of three steps: Step of getting or taking, Step of occupation, and Step of consumption & production of Energy, and each step become the basis of various meaning extensions. This study also analyzes negative implications of the Thai verb, KIN. The negative implications are found to be based on metaphorical concepts, EATING IS EGOISTIC ACTION and EATING IS GETTING OUT OF THE MIDDLE WAY. This study helps to understand the cognitive mechanism of polysemy and grammaticalization by presenting the motivation behind conceptualization of the prototypical meaning of the polysemous verb “KIN.” We hope for this study to contribute in both cognitive linguistics and teaching Thai as a foreign language.
참고문헌 (27)
- คยฺองอึน ปาร์ค., "ปรากฏการณ์พหุนัยของคําว่า 가다 ในภาษาเกาหลี เปรียบเทียบกับคําว่า ไป ในภาษาไทย: การศึกษาตามแนวภาษาศาสตร์ ปริชาน", 박사, pp.2011
- คยฺองอึน ปาร์ค., "การทําให้เด่นของคําว่าไปและมาในภาษาไทยและภาษาเกาหลี: การศึกษาเชิงไวยากรณ์ปริชานในความหมายเชิงการณ์ลักษณะ", วารสาร มนุษยศาสตร์ปริทรรศน์, 36(2), pp.41~60 (2014)
- รุจิวรรณ เหล่าไพโรจน์, "การศึกษาคําหลายความหมาย คําว่า ăn “กิน” ในภาษา เวียดนาม: การศึกษาตามแนวภาษาศาสตร์ปริชาน", วารสารภาษาและ วัฒนธรรม, 36(2), pp.29~40 (2017)
- ส.พลายน้อย, "กระยานิยาย สารพัดเรื่องราวน่ารู้จากรอบ ๆ สํารับ" (2010), สํานักพิมพ์พิมพ์คํา
- อันธิกา ธรรมเนียม และนัทธ์ชนัน นาถประทาน, "การศึกษาอุปลักษณ์เชิงมโน ทัศน์ของคําว่า กินภาษาไทย", หนังสือรวมบทความการประชุมวิชาการ ระดับชาติ “มนุษยศาสตร์ในทศวรรษใหม่: พลวัตแห่งองค์ความรู้กับพหุ ลักษณ์ทางวัฒนธรรม, pp.37~46 (2011)
- 권연진, "인지언어학에서 은유의 보편성과 상대성" (2017), 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "다의어의 비대칭 양상", 언어과학연구, 15, pp.309~331 (1998)
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "의미관계의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2017), 한국문화사
- 박경은, "태국어 신체 어휘 의미의 은유적 확장 - “므” (‘손’) 의 다의성", 동남아연구, 22(1), pp.127~150 (2012), 동남아연구소[DOI]
- 박경은, "태국어 신체어휘", naa, lang, pp.의 문법화와 교육에서의 시사점, 한국태국학회논총[DOI]
- 안명철, "한국어 ‘먹다’와 베트남어 ‘ăn’의 의미 용법 비교: 격과 의미역 구조를 중심으로", 한국학연구, (29), pp.309~352 (2013), 한국학연구소
- 이종열, "‘먹다’의 다의적 의미와 구문적 확장", 한국어학, (27), pp.249~277 (2005), 한국어학회
- 종결, "한국어 '먹다'와 중국어 '吃(chi)'의 의미 확장 비교", 국어문학, 51(51), pp.29~61 (2011), 국어문학회[DOI]
- 홍달오, "動詞 ‘들다", 나다’의 意味에 대한 認知言語學的 考察, 2010, pp.38(1), 131~153[DOI]
- 김은혜, "동사 ‘먹다’를 통해 살펴본 한국어 고급 학습자의 다의 관계 인식 양상 연구", 국어교육학연구, (41), pp.311~338 (2011), 국어교육학회[DOI]
- Duangmala, Veerachat, "汉语带 “ 吃 ” 词语 和泰 语带 kin(33) 词语对 比 研究", pp.2017
- Evans, Vyvyan, "인지언어학 기초" (2008), 한국문화사
- Johnson, M., "The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
- Kövecses, Z., "Metonymy in Language and Thought", pp.17~59 (1999), John Benjamins
- Lakoff, G., "삶으로서의 은유" (1995), 서광사
- Lakoff, G., "Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought" (1999), Basic Books
- Rhee, S., "Eating is Contemptible: Grammaticalization of Ingestion Verbs in Korean", Japanese Korean Linguistics, 12, pp.40~51 (2003)
- Rosch, E., "Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories", Journal of Experimental Psychology : General, 104, pp.192~233 (1975)
- Rosch, E., "Human Categorization. in Studies in Cross-linguistic Psychology" (1977), Academic press
- Taylor, J. R., "인지문법" (2005), 한국문화사
- Singnoi, U., "Eating Terms: What the Category Reveals about the Thai Mind", MANUSAYA: Journal of Humanities, 9(1), pp.82~109 (2006)