이승만･박정희 정부의 정부개혁에 대한 비교 연구

Abstract

This research is a paper that categorized and analyzed the government reform of the Rhee Syng-man and Park Chung-hee administrations into government organizational reform, fiscal reform, personnel reform and anti-corruption reform. The results of the study are as follows. First, in the case of government organizational reform, if the Rhee Syng-man administration was centered on government organizational reform centered on social order and people's health, the Park Chung-hee administration's government organizational reform was centered on economic development. Second, in the case of fiscal reform, the Rhee Syng-man administration attempted to overhaul the system, organization, and law, but if the government did not have a department in charge of long-term comprehensive economic development plans, the Park Chung-hee administration had a system for fiscal reform, an organization, and a department in charge of long-term comprehensive economic development plans, which enabled continuous and overall fiscal reform. Third, in the case of personnel reform, if the Rhee Syng-man administration interpreted and operated laws and regulations so simply and arbitrarily that it remained in the reform of the political realist, the Park Chung-hee administration prepared a legal and institutional foundation and promoted the system of appointment and promotion of public officials as performance-based, it could be seen as a difference. Fourth, if the Rhee Syng-man administration remained in the anti-corruption reform in the way that individuals are held responsible for the anti-corruption reform, the Park Chung-hee administration strongly reformed the law and system.