국민참여재판의 개시요건에 대한 고찰- 「대상사건의 축소」와「절차회부의 의무화」를 중심으로 -
A Critical Study for Opening Requirements of The Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial
0
조회
0
다운로드
27
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Our criminal justice system introduced a new system that is called "The Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial" in 2008. The citizens' participation trial as new trial is testing now. That test operation period is over in 2012 and one year later, we had to decide whether to abolish this new trial system after reviewing test results for five years. However The prospects for this participation trial system are not bright. Because the judicial citizens' participation trial come face to face with a crisis right now. Especially, more than all, it is a typical example of this crisis that the implementation rate of participation trial is very low. The cause of this crisis is as in the following. 1. low rates of application 2. high rates of withdrawal 3. high rates of exclusion Therefore, one year later, to prevent from being abolished this new trial system, we need to come up with measures to vitalize the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial. In line with this thinking, something to notice here is the opening requirements of the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial. Under current law, to initiate criminal proceedings as the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial, the following requirements must be satisfied. 1. the case should be belong to the subject range of application in Article 52. the accused should submit an application including expressions that he want to receive the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial 3. the exclusion reasons provided in Article 9 should be no From among these opening requirements, the second requirement is largely responsible for critical situations that the implementation rate of participation trial is very low. Thus, to overcome this kind of situation, we need to (1) scale down the subject range of application of Article 3 under current law, (2) carry out the obligatory citizens' participation trial within the demagnified range of application. In short, something needed to vitalize the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial is the selection and concentration through the reduction of application case and the compulsory opening of the citizens' participation trial than an increase in quantity by the expansion of application case.
Abstract
Our criminal justice system introduced a new system that is called "The Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial" in 2008. The citizens' participation trial as new trial is testing now. That test operation period is over in 2012 and one year later, we had to decide whether to abolish this new trial system after reviewing test results for five years. However The prospects for this participation trial system are not bright. Because the judicial citizens' participation trial come face to face with a crisis right now. Especially, more than all, it is a typical example of this crisis that the implementation rate of participation trial is very low. The cause of this crisis is as in the following. 1. low rates of application 2. high rates of withdrawal 3. high rates of exclusion Therefore, one year later, to prevent from being abolished this new trial system, we need to come up with measures to vitalize the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial. In line with this thinking, something to notice here is the opening requirements of the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial. Under current law, to initiate criminal proceedings as the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial, the following requirements must be satisfied. 1. the case should be belong to the subject range of application in Article 52. the accused should submit an application including expressions that he want to receive the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial 3. the exclusion reasons provided in Article 9 should be no From among these opening requirements, the second requirement is largely responsible for critical situations that the implementation rate of participation trial is very low. Thus, to overcome this kind of situation, we need to (1) scale down the subject range of application of Article 3 under current law, (2) carry out the obligatory citizens' participation trial within the demagnified range of application. In short, something needed to vitalize the Judicial Citizens' Participation Trial is the selection and concentration through the reduction of application case and the compulsory opening of the citizens' participation trial than an increase in quantity by the expansion of application case.
참고문헌 (19)
- 법원행정처, "국민의 형사재판 참여에 관한 법률 해설", ~ (2007)
- 법원행정처, "국민참여재판의 이해" (2007)
- 국민참여재판 성과분석(2008-2009), "법원행정처", ~ (2010)
- 김병수, "국민참여재판의 중간평가", 형사정책연구, 21(3), pp.311~348 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김봉수, "새로운 형사재판에서 피해자의 권리보호", 피해자학연구, 16(1), pp.277~298 (2008), 한국피해자학회
- 김용찬, "국민참여재판 회부시까지의 절차에 관한 고찰", 저스티스, (116), pp.73~101 (2010), 한국법학원
- 김태규, "국민참여재판의 개선방안에 대한 연구", 형사정책연구, 19(4), pp.127~156 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김태명, "국민참여재판제도의 개선과제", 인권과 정의, (379), pp.27~43 (2008), 대한변호사협회
- 김 현 석, "국민참여재판의 도입에 따른 공판절차의 변화", 저스티스, (101), pp.108~149 (2007), 한국법학원
- 박미숙, "국민참여재판의 시행성과와 향후과제", 형사정책연구, 21(2), pp.135~174 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이동희, "국민참여재판의 시행평가와 개선방안", 법학연구, 30, pp.219~250 (2010), 부설법학연구소
- 이은모, "현행 국민참여재판제도의 내용과 문제점 -일본의 재판원제도와의 비교를 중심으로-", 법학논총, 26(1), pp.405~426 (2009), 법학연구소
- 이완규, "국민참여재판제도의 정착방안에 대한 토론문", 저스티스, 통권 : 106, pp.544~550 (2008)
- 정진수, "일본의 재판원 제도 - 그 성립경위와 주요내용", 형사정책연구, 18(3), pp.839~864 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
- 정진연, "국민참여재판과 형사재판의 소송주체의 역할 비교", 법학논총, 19, pp.133~160 (2008), 법학연구소
- 국민참여재판의 실무상 운영방안 및 주요쟁점, 형사재판의 쟁점과 과제, "최재혁", 457~458 (2008)
- 한상훈, "국민참여재판제도의 정착방안", 저스티스, (106), pp.483~534 (2008), 한국법학원
- 한인섭, "한국의 배심원재판 -준비과정과 시행원년의 성과를 검토한다-", 서울대학교 법학, 50(2), pp.681~710 (2009), 법학연구소
- 황병돈, "국민참여재판 시행 과정상 제기된 문제점 및 개선 방안", 한양법학, (30), pp.33~61 (2010), 한양법학회
