초·중·고등학교 교원의 정치활동의 범죄화 비판
De-criminalization of the Political Activities of School Teachers
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Under the current Korean law, unlike university/college professors,elementary/middle/high school teachers are not allowed to join a political party and engage in collective political activities including political campaigns for or against a political party during election period. Although the Korean Teachers and Education Union [KTU] received official recognition in 1999, it is not also permitted to engage in any political activity. The teachers who have breached this prohibition are given criminal sanction as well as administrative sanction. The Constitutional Court of Korea decided such criminalization of the politically active teachers is constitutional because; education must be separated from politics and teachers must be politically neutral; minors are immature unlike college students, so easily influenced by political activities of teachers; the students' right to class may be infringed by political activities of teachers. The Court also held that the criminal prohibition does not violate the constitutional principle of equality before law in that major tasks of teachers are teaching while those of professors are academic research. In cases where teachers collectively announced political declarations to criticize governments' policies in 2004 and 2009, the Supreme Court of Korea quashed the lower courts' judgements and held that the teachers violated political neutrality with intention to establish anti-government political front. This Article starts with a review of the OECD countries' law and international norm regarding teachers' engagement in political activities. It proceeds to criticize the judgements of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court. It finally argues that current law regarding teachers'political activities excessively restricts teachers' political rights, therefore unconstitutional. Until the revision of the law, the law should be interpreted in a limited way to respect teachers' political rights.
Abstract
Under the current Korean law, unlike university/college professors,elementary/middle/high school teachers are not allowed to join a political party and engage in collective political activities including political campaigns for or against a political party during election period. Although the Korean Teachers and Education Union [KTU] received official recognition in 1999, it is not also permitted to engage in any political activity. The teachers who have breached this prohibition are given criminal sanction as well as administrative sanction. The Constitutional Court of Korea decided such criminalization of the politically active teachers is constitutional because; education must be separated from politics and teachers must be politically neutral; minors are immature unlike college students, so easily influenced by political activities of teachers; the students' right to class may be infringed by political activities of teachers. The Court also held that the criminal prohibition does not violate the constitutional principle of equality before law in that major tasks of teachers are teaching while those of professors are academic research. In cases where teachers collectively announced political declarations to criticize governments' policies in 2004 and 2009, the Supreme Court of Korea quashed the lower courts' judgements and held that the teachers violated political neutrality with intention to establish anti-government political front. This Article starts with a review of the OECD countries' law and international norm regarding teachers' engagement in political activities. It proceeds to criticize the judgements of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court. It finally argues that current law regarding teachers'political activities excessively restricts teachers' political rights, therefore unconstitutional. Until the revision of the law, the law should be interpreted in a limited way to respect teachers' political rights.
참고문헌 (20)
- "2007-2011 국가인권정책기본계획 권고안" (2006), 국가인권위원회[URL]
- 정영화, "헌법상 공무원의 정치적 자유의 제한과 그 한계", 헌법학연구, 18(1), pp.393~427 (2012), 한국헌법학회
- "조선일보" (2011)[URL]
- "한겨레" (2011)[URL]
- 노기호, "교육의 정치적 중립성과 초중등교원의 정치적 권리의 제한", 인권과 정의, (340), pp.62~80 (2004), 대한변호사협회
- 박재윤, "미국의 사례: 조건부 정치참여...교원단체, 특정 후보지지", 새교육, pp.48~52 (2001)
- 허종렬, "憲法上 敎員 및 敎員團體의 政治的 基本權 保障", 교육법학연구, 10, pp.127~154 (1998), 대한교육법학회
- 김현준, "교원들 정당활동 활발...교원단체들 정치기금 조성-영국 교원과 교원단체의 정치 참여-", 새교육, pp.84~87 (2001)
- 안미숙, "영국 교원의 위상과 권한", 새교육, pp.68~ (2001)
- 조홍식, "프랑스의 사례: 정당활동 활발...정계 진출하면 휴직 · 복직 보장", 새교육, pp.60~63 (2001)
- 박광기, "독일의 사례: 선거운동 참여...교원단체, 특정정당지지", 새교육, pp.56~59 (2001)
- 이계수, "공무원의 정치활동금지의무에 대한 비판적 고찰", 민주법학, (29), pp.311~336 (2005), 민주주의법학연구회
- 박선영, "일본의 사례: 법으로 금지...간접 정치활동에 그쳐", 새교육, pp.53~55 (2001)
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of the Right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression, "Frank La Rue", ~
- 손희권, "국 · 공립학교 초 · 중등교원들의 정치활동을 제한하는 것은 헌법에 위반되는가?", 교육행정연구, 22(2), pp.411~412 (2004)
- 오동석, "교사의 정치적 기본권", 민주법학, (44), pp.199~224 (2010), 민주주의법학연구회
- 정영태, "초ㆍ중등학교 교원의 정치적 자유권 제한에 대한 헌법재판소의 논거와 문제점", 교육문화연구, 16(2), pp.5~44 (2010), 교육연구소
- 이상돈, "조용한 혁명", ~ (2011)
- "인천지법의 전교조 교사 벌금형 ‘비겁했다’" (2010)[URL]
- 조국, "법률의 무지 및 착오 이론에 대한 재검토", 형사정책연구, 2
