본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

새로운 위험의 등장과 형법의 임무 변화? - 9 ․ 11 테러 이후 영국을 중심으로 -

The emergence of new danger and the change of the mission of criminal law - focusing on the UK after 9 ․ 11 terror -

0

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Rate of progress and development of science and technology has already surpassed the level that humans can predict. However, progress is impossible to predict means the potential risk of unexpected. Beck's 'Risikogesellschaft', the emergence of the concept here is why. However,the threats of terrorism appear, a danger inherent in the concept of risk society has changed. However, in the Risikogesellschaft furthermore, a new risk of terrorism that emerged, though there is no change in the mission of the criminal law. That is not the change of mission, but that of function of criminal law. Among them, reinforcement of the function of preventing is neither internal relation with change in the mission of the criminal law. The expansion of the Risikostrafrecht or Präventionsstrafrecht is similar to sports car racing brakes failed. Recent counter-terrorism laws in the UK again in safety and freedom as the freedom of the dilemma has been regression. This means to seek harmony between the flow is again in the liberal rule of law, basic principles of criminal law, liability principle, the function of criminal law. In this sense, the expansion of the Risikostrafrecht or Präventionsstrafrecht will continue to look for harmony. The expansion of the Risikostrafrecht should not be understood by piecemeal.

Abstract

Rate of progress and development of science and technology has already surpassed the level that humans can predict. However, progress is impossible to predict means the potential risk of unexpected. Beck's 'Risikogesellschaft', the emergence of the concept here is why. However,the threats of terrorism appear, a danger inherent in the concept of risk society has changed. However, in the Risikogesellschaft furthermore, a new risk of terrorism that emerged, though there is no change in the mission of the criminal law. That is not the change of mission, but that of function of criminal law. Among them, reinforcement of the function of preventing is neither internal relation with change in the mission of the criminal law. The expansion of the Risikostrafrecht or Präventionsstrafrecht is similar to sports car racing brakes failed. Recent counter-terrorism laws in the UK again in safety and freedom as the freedom of the dilemma has been regression. This means to seek harmony between the flow is again in the liberal rule of law, basic principles of criminal law, liability principle, the function of criminal law. In this sense, the expansion of the Risikostrafrecht or Präventionsstrafrecht will continue to look for harmony. The expansion of the Risikostrafrecht should not be understood by piecemeal.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. 김일수, "형법총론(제11판)" (2008), 박영사
  2. 박강우, "위험형법론" (2008), 한국학술정보
  3. 배종대, "형법총론(10판)" (2011), 홍문사
  4. 오영근, "형법총론(제2판 보정판)" (2012), 박영사
  5. 이재상, "형법총론(제7판)" (2011), 박영사
  6. 김재윤, "위험사회에 있어 형법의 팽창현상에 대한 비판적 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 7(1), pp.29~52 (2005), 한국비교형사법학회
  7. 김재윤, "위험사회라는 사회 변화에 대한 형사법의 대응", 비교형사법연구, 12(2), pp.251~276 (2010), 한국비교형사법학회
  8. 김영환, "위험사회에서의 형법의 귀속원리", 법철학연구, 3(2) (2000), 한국법철학회
  9. 김학태, "상징형법의 의미와 기능", 외법논집, 6 (1999), 한국외대 법학연구소
  10. 김학태, "현대위험사회에서의 형법상 귀속구조의 변화", 비교형사법연구, 3(1) (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
  11. 류전철, "위험사회(Risikogesellschaft)와 위험형법(Risikostrafrecht)", 법률행정논집, 18 (1998), 전남대 법률행정연구소
  12. 박광민, "위험사회의 등장에 따른 형법의 대응", 성균관법학, 18(3), pp.513~534 (2006), 법학연구소
  13. 이용식, "위험사회에서의 법익보호와 적극적 일반예방", 형사정책, 13(1) (2001), 한국형사정책연구원
  14. 이훈동, "추상적 위험범의 확대경향과 문제점", 외법논집, 10 (2001)
  15. 최석윤, "상징형법에 대한 비판적 고찰", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.6~164 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
  16. 홍찬숙, "울리히 벡의 ‘위험사회’와 ‘하위 정치’의 마키아벨리즘: 개인화 테제를 중심으로", 사회와 이론, (14)통권 : 14, pp.213~241 (2009), 한국이론사회학회
  17. 허일태, "위험사회에 있어서 형법의 임무", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.1~32 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
  18. Urich Beck, "Politik in der Risikogesellschaft" (1991)
  19. Johaness Wessels, "Strafrecht AT, 25 Aufl" (1995)
  20. Windfried Hassemer, "Alternativ-Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch, Bd.1" (1990), Neuewied und Darmstadt
  21. Christina Pantazis, "Reconfiguring security and liberty: political discourses and public opinion in the new century", British Journal of Criminology (2012)
  22. Cilve Walker, "The Terrorism and Investigations Measures Act 2011 : one thing but not much the other?" (2012), Criminal Law Review
  23. David Omerod, "Serious Crime Act 2007 : the Part 2 offences", Crminal Law Review (2009)
  24. Giacinto Della Cananea, "Return to due process of law : the European Union and the fight against terrorism", European Law Review (2007)
  25. Windfried Hassmer, "Symbolisches Strafrecht und Rechtgterschutz", NStZ (1989)
  26. Windfried Hassmer, "Produktverantwortung im modernen Strafrecht, 2 Aufl" (1996)
  27. Hirsch, "Strafrecht als Mittel zur Bekämpfung neuer Kriminalitätformen?, In Neue Strafrechtentwicklungen im deutsch-japanischen Vergleich" (1995)
  28. C. Prittwitz, "Funktionalisierung des Strafrechts", StV (1991)
  29. Kurt Seelmann, "Risikogesellschaft", KritV (1992)
  30. Günter Stratenwerth, "Zukunftssicherung mit den Mitteln des Strafrecht", ZStW, 105 (1993)
  31. "가디언"[URL]
  32. "강력범죄조직국"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)