보호관찰에 대한 범죄자 만족도 요인 연구
Exploring the Predictors of Offenders' Satisfaction of their Probation
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The current study aims at exploring factors that predict perception of the probation, specifically offenders' satisfaction level of their probation. There is a paucity of study examined probationers' perception of their punishment in spite of the importance of various community-based correction programs. This study will demonstrate characteristics, types of probation order and bonding between offenders and probation officers associated with the probationers' perception. The total sample consist of 290 probationers selected from probation offices. Overall, the probationers' attitude and perceived satisfaction toward their experience of probation were positive. In addition, statistically significant differences in total offenders' satisfaction of their probation were found among those probationers who were under simple probation supervision, those who had additional community service order(or attendance order), and those who were supervised by GPS Electronic Monitoring. Perception were the most positive among offenders who had both probation order and community service order(or attendance order). The result of multiple linear regression analysis showed that (1) age, (2) types of probation, (3) bonding between offenders and probation officers were statistically significant factors that predict the probationers' perception, when other variables were controlled. On average, one unit increase in age, the offenders' perception of their probation decrease by 0.086. Furthermore, offenders under simple probation order had about 2.339 higher satisfaction level than the offenders under GPS electronic monitoring. Besides probationers who completed extra community service order(or attendance order) had about 3.274 higher perception score than the offenders monitored by GPS electronic monitoring. Finally, for every on unit increase in bonding between offenders and probation officer, the perception of probation increases by 1.431 averagely. The practical implications of these results are discussed.
Abstract
The current study aims at exploring factors that predict perception of the probation, specifically offenders' satisfaction level of their probation. There is a paucity of study examined probationers' perception of their punishment in spite of the importance of various community-based correction programs. This study will demonstrate characteristics, types of probation order and bonding between offenders and probation officers associated with the probationers' perception. The total sample consist of 290 probationers selected from probation offices. Overall, the probationers' attitude and perceived satisfaction toward their experience of probation were positive. In addition, statistically significant differences in total offenders' satisfaction of their probation were found among those probationers who were under simple probation supervision, those who had additional community service order(or attendance order), and those who were supervised by GPS Electronic Monitoring. Perception were the most positive among offenders who had both probation order and community service order(or attendance order). The result of multiple linear regression analysis showed that (1) age, (2) types of probation, (3) bonding between offenders and probation officers were statistically significant factors that predict the probationers' perception, when other variables were controlled. On average, one unit increase in age, the offenders' perception of their probation decrease by 0.086. Furthermore, offenders under simple probation order had about 2.339 higher satisfaction level than the offenders under GPS electronic monitoring. Besides probationers who completed extra community service order(or attendance order) had about 3.274 higher perception score than the offenders monitored by GPS electronic monitoring. Finally, for every on unit increase in bonding between offenders and probation officer, the perception of probation increases by 1.431 averagely. The practical implications of these results are discussed.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김일수, "한국 보호관찰 20년의 성과와 과제", 보호관찰제도 도입 20주년 기념 국제세미나 자료집 (2009), 법무부
- 법무연수원, "범죄백서" (2009), 법무부
- 법무부, "한국보호관찰 20년사 열정과 희망의 발자취" (2009), 법무부
- 성폭력범죄자에 대한 위치추적 전자감독제도의 효과성 연구, 2009년 법무부 연구과제, "조윤오", 법무부, ~ (2009)
- 최석윤, "보호관찰제도의 정비방안에 관한 일고찰", 형사정책연구, 16(2), pp.211~244 (2005), 한국형사정책연구원
- Aoe, S., "Evidence-based Adult Corrections Programs: What Works and What Does not" (2006), Washington State Institute of Public Policy
- Clear, T. R., "Community Justice" (2003), Wadsworth
- Clear, T. R., "American Corrections (8th ed)", pp.2009, Wadsworth
- Broken Windows' Probation: The Next Step in Fighting Crime, "Dilulio, J.", New York: Center for Civic Innovation at the Manhattan Institute, ~, pp.Civic Report No. 7, August 1999 (2000)
- Farrington, D. P., "Randomized experiments in crimimology: what have we learned in the past two decades", Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(1), pp.9~38 (2005)
- Fulton, B., "Moderating probation and parole officer attitude to achieve desired outcomes", Prison Journal, 77, pp.295~312 (1997)
- Garland, A. F., "Determinates of youth and parent satisfaction in usual care psychotherapy", Evaluation and Program Planning, 30, pp.45~54 (2007)
- Kemshall, H., "Public Protection, Partnership and Risk Penalty: The Multi-Agency Risk Management of Sexual and Violent Offenders", Punishment and Society, 3(2), pp.237~264 (2001)
- Kemshall, H., "Beyond Public Protection: An examination of community protection and public health approaches to high-risk offenders", Criminology and Criminal Justice, 7(3), pp.203~222 (2007)
- Knipscheer, J. W., "The importance of ethnic similarity in the therapist-patient dyad among Surinamese migrants in Dutch mental health care", Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 77, pp.273~278 (2004)
- Mair, G., "Offenders on probation", Home Office Research Study, 167 (1997)
- Martin, J., "Adult helping qualities preferred by adolescent", Adolescence, 41, pp.127~140 (2006)
- May D. C., "What influences offenders' willingness to serve alternative sanctions", The Prison Journal, 85, pp.145~167 (2005)
- May, D. C., "Predicting offenders generated exchange rates: Implications for a theory of sentence severity", Crime & Delinquency, 51, pp.373~399 (2005)
- Petersilia, J., "Perceptions of punishment: Inmates and staff rank the severity of prison versus intermediate sanctions", The Prison Journal, 74, pp.306~332 (1994)
- Raynor, P., "Straight thinking on probation: evidence-based practice and the culture of curiosity. in: Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment: Implementing and Evaluating Effective Programs" (2001), Wiley
- Paparozzi, M., "Probation and Parole: Overworked, Misunderstood, and Under-Appreciated: But Why?", The Howard Journal, 47(3), pp.275~296 (2008)
- Smith, P., "The Effects of Prison Sentences and Intermediate Sanctions on Recidivism: General Effects and Individual Differences" (2002), Correctional Services of Canada
- Spelman, W., "The severity of intermediate sanctions", Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32, pp.107~135 (1995)
- Springer, N. F., "Exploring the determinants of probationers' perceptions of their supervising officers", Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 48, pp.210~227 (2009)