법여성주의에서 바라본 성에 대한 법인식의 문제
Feministic Perspective on the legal awareness about Sexuality -focused on the object of the rape
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Traditionally, we have known that the rape is done by men towards women. however, it is very rare case that criminal law operate the rape as special elements to constitute for women. especially considering the universality and the anti-sexuality are hallmarks of criminal law. In generally, legal interest of the rape is sexual self-determination, not a chastity or virgin of female. That means a freedom do not have sex with someone if one don't feel like doing. But There's always a question about it, why the object of sexual self-determination limit to only 'women', though all human being have sexual self-determination based on the self-determination in article 10 of the Constitution. In general, sexual self-determination is the benefit and protection of the sexual assaults and its contents are changed to the other according to each crime composition important matter. Then, restricting the object of the rape is limited to 'women' by criminal law in korea that is considered overprotecting women compared with other crimes or show the legal interest of rape is women's chastity or virginity as ever, not sexual self-determination. but the latter is a premodern concept and must be sublated. So, I will understand the legal interest of the rape is sexual self-determination which is one of the personal rights, out of the scope of women's chastity which survive until today. and judge whether the rape will be formed on this benefit and protection of the criminal law. From it, we can expect equality between the sexes in rape as soon as and changes of legislation and the construction of law in gender aspects.
Abstract
Traditionally, we have known that the rape is done by men towards women. however, it is very rare case that criminal law operate the rape as special elements to constitute for women. especially considering the universality and the anti-sexuality are hallmarks of criminal law. In generally, legal interest of the rape is sexual self-determination, not a chastity or virgin of female. That means a freedom do not have sex with someone if one don't feel like doing. But There's always a question about it, why the object of sexual self-determination limit to only 'women', though all human being have sexual self-determination based on the self-determination in article 10 of the Constitution. In general, sexual self-determination is the benefit and protection of the sexual assaults and its contents are changed to the other according to each crime composition important matter. Then, restricting the object of the rape is limited to 'women' by criminal law in korea that is considered overprotecting women compared with other crimes or show the legal interest of rape is women's chastity or virginity as ever, not sexual self-determination. but the latter is a premodern concept and must be sublated. So, I will understand the legal interest of the rape is sexual self-determination which is one of the personal rights, out of the scope of women's chastity which survive until today. and judge whether the rape will be formed on this benefit and protection of the criminal law. From it, we can expect equality between the sexes in rape as soon as and changes of legislation and the construction of law in gender aspects.
참고문헌 (43)
- 김일수, "한국형법I" (1996), 박영사
- 배종대, "형법각론" (2006), 홍문사
- 백형구, "형법각론" (2002), 청림
- 손동권, "형법각론" (2006), 율곡출판사
- 이상돈, "형법학" (1999), 법문사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2004), 신조사
- 이정원, "형법각론" (2008), 법지사
- 임 웅, "형법각론" (2009), 법문사
- 김석권, "성전환증(male-to-female) 환자의 질성형술", 대한성형외과학회지, 18(6) (1991), 대한성형외과학회
- 김애령, "지배받는 몸, 자유로운 몸-다시 보는 여성의 몸", 여성과 사회, 6 (1995)
- 김용화, "법에서의 성 개념 정의에 관한 연구", 아시아여성연구, 46(1), pp.247~
- 金台明, "性轉換을 둘러싼 法的 問題點에 대한 檢討", 저스티스, 71, pp.26~51 (2003), 한국법학원
- 김혜정, "시대의 변화에 따른 강간죄의 객체 및 행위태양에 관한 재구성", 비교형사법연구, 9(1), pp.187~208 (2007), 한국비교형사법학회
- 노미덕, "성적 자기결정권의 보호와 강간죄의 객체에 관한 여성주의적 고찰", 석사, pp.2008
- 류 화 진, "우리 형법상 아내강간의 강간죄 성립여부", 여성연구, 2(67), pp.5~36 (2004), 한국여성정책연구원
- 박강우, "서구의 여성주의 법운동 및 강간죄 개혁의 성과와 성적 자기결정권의 함의", 형사법연구, (26), pp.829~855 (2006), 한국형사법학회
- 박기석, "폭력범죄 규정 정비방안", 형사법연구, 22 (2004)
- 박은정, "여성주의와 비판적 법이론" (1997), 법문사
- 박혜진, "성매매특별법의 정당성과 형법정책", 박사, pp.2007
- 박혜진, "형법상 성적 자기결정권 개념에 대한 성찰", 형사법연구, 21(3), pp.229~252 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 배종대, "부부강간죄 도입은 불필요한 과잉입법이다", 대한변협신문, (40) (2002)
- 성폭력의 실태 및 대책에 관한 연구, "심영희", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1990)
- "사회적으로 용납될 수 없는 부부강간은 처벌해야, 시민과 변호사" (2005), 이은영[URL]
- 이호중, "성폭력 처벌규정에 대한 비판적 성찰 및 재구성", 형사정책, 17(2), pp.81~114 (2005), 한국형사정책학회
- 임인숙, "사회적으로 재구성되는 여성의 몸", 성평등연구, 9 (2005), 가톨릭대학교 성 평등연구원
- 장영민, "처의 성적 자기결정권 보호-부부강간죄의 성립여부에 관한 고찰", 법학논집, 6(1), pp.165~182 (2001), 법학연구소
- 정현미, "성전환수술자의 강간죄의 객체여부", 형사판례연구, 6 (1998), 형사판례연구회
- 정희진, "성적 자기결정권을 넘어서-‘공간, 몸, 성폭력’. in: 섹슈얼리티 강의, 두 번째" (2006), 동녘
- 조 국, "남성 중심적 강간죄 형법규정과 해석론 비판. in: 형사법의 성편향(제2판)" (2003), 박영사
- 쥬디스 버틀러, "젠더 트러블-페미니즘과 정체성의 전복" (2009), 문학동네
- 여성폭력방지 종합대책, "한국여성개발원", 여성부, ~ (2001)
- 한인섭, "성폭력의 법적 문제와 대책", 인간발달연구, 3(1) (1996)
- 허라금, "여성의 몸", 한국여성철학회 창립 1주년 기념 심포지엄 (1998), 한국여성철학회
- 홍춘의, "성전환자의 성별판단에 대한 법적 접근", 서울대학교 BK21 법학연구단 공익인권법 센터 학술세미나 자료집 (2002)
- Greenberg, "Defining Male and Female: Intersexuality and Collision between Law andBiology", Ariz. L. Review, 41, pp.280~
- J. C. Smith, "Criminal Law, 9th. ed." (1999), LexisNexis
- Jane Freedman, "Feminism" (2002), 이후
- Judith Butler, "Sex and Gender in Beauvoir's Second Sex", Yale French Studies, Simone de Beauvoir: Witness and century, 72 (1986)
- Lorraine Corner, "Gender Main-streaming : Conceptual Framework", Methodology and Presentation of Good Practice (1998)
- Monique Wittig, "The point of view: Universal or Particular?", Feminist Issues, 3(2) (1983)
- Simone de Beauvoir, "The Second Sex" (1973), Vintage
- Wayne R. LaFave, "Criminal Law, 3rd. ed.", pp.2000, Thomson
- Weire, "Transsexualism in germany: empirical data on epidemiology and application of the German Transsexual's Act during its first ten years", Achieves of Sexual Behavior, 25(4) (1996)