성적 자기결정권의 형법적 의의와 기능
The Meaning and Function of Sexual Self-Determination on Criminal Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
28
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is intended to analyze the meaning and function of sexual self-determination, and to predict what the sexual self-determination will be meaningful in the criminal justice system. The Constitutional Court defines the sexual self-determination as ‘the right to determine the sexual act status and the sex partner’ with respect to the adultery. As an active meaning, the sexual self-determination can be understood as ‘the right to have sex freely by sexual moral’. Also, the sexual self-determination includes ‘the right not to receive an illegal sexual assault(passive meaning)’. The criminal law limits the active meaning's sexual self-determination, on the other hand, it protects the passive meaning's sexual self-determination. In particular, it strongly protects the sexual self-determination of persons who don't have the self-determination ability like the mentally and physically handicapped persons or minors. The following describes the trends of the present criminal justice system that the sexual self-determination is stressed. First, the adultery still exists but it is highly likely to be subject to decriminalization as people say that the law possibly violates the constitution. Second, the Constitutional Court defines that the man and woman's sexual self-determination must be respected as it judges that the crime of sexual intercourse under pretence of marriage is unconstitutional. Third, wife is highly likely to be recognized as an object of rape by husband. Also, the rape without consent is highly likely to be introduced. Fourth, with respect to the lascivious crimes, the regulation for adults has been relaxed, but the regulation for minors becomes stronger. In the present criminal justice system, it can be confirmed that the criminal law's role has been reduced when the sexual self-determination is stressed. Such the situation is not limited to the sexual self-determination, and will produce the same result in all areas that the self-determination can be discussed. However,as the result of trusting the self-determination limitlessly, considering the benefit and protection of other laws must not be neglected. That is, the self-determination must be exercised within the limit of not infringing the other person's determination. Also, there must be the attitude not to neglect the national and social benefits of law as a citizen who lives in the community.
Abstract
This study is intended to analyze the meaning and function of sexual self-determination, and to predict what the sexual self-determination will be meaningful in the criminal justice system. The Constitutional Court defines the sexual self-determination as ‘the right to determine the sexual act status and the sex partner’ with respect to the adultery. As an active meaning, the sexual self-determination can be understood as ‘the right to have sex freely by sexual moral’. Also, the sexual self-determination includes ‘the right not to receive an illegal sexual assault(passive meaning)’. The criminal law limits the active meaning's sexual self-determination, on the other hand, it protects the passive meaning's sexual self-determination. In particular, it strongly protects the sexual self-determination of persons who don't have the self-determination ability like the mentally and physically handicapped persons or minors. The following describes the trends of the present criminal justice system that the sexual self-determination is stressed. First, the adultery still exists but it is highly likely to be subject to decriminalization as people say that the law possibly violates the constitution. Second, the Constitutional Court defines that the man and woman's sexual self-determination must be respected as it judges that the crime of sexual intercourse under pretence of marriage is unconstitutional. Third, wife is highly likely to be recognized as an object of rape by husband. Also, the rape without consent is highly likely to be introduced. Fourth, with respect to the lascivious crimes, the regulation for adults has been relaxed, but the regulation for minors becomes stronger. In the present criminal justice system, it can be confirmed that the criminal law's role has been reduced when the sexual self-determination is stressed. Such the situation is not limited to the sexual self-determination, and will produce the same result in all areas that the self-determination can be discussed. However,as the result of trusting the self-determination limitlessly, considering the benefit and protection of other laws must not be neglected. That is, the self-determination must be exercised within the limit of not infringing the other person's determination. Also, there must be the attitude not to neglect the national and social benefits of law as a citizen who lives in the community.
참고문헌 (19)
- 김성돈, "형법각론" (2008), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 김일수, "형법각론" (2007), 박영사
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2010), 박영사
- 임웅, "형법각론" (2007), 법문사
- 오영근, "형법각론" (2009), 박영사
- 정성근, "형법각론" (2008), 삼지원
- 권형준, "자기결정에 관한 헌법재판소의 판례분석", 법학논총, 17 (2000), 한양대학교 법학연구소
- 김경제, "간통처벌규정에 대한 합헌결정이 가지는 헌법적 문제점", 헌법학연구, 15(2), pp.121~152 (2009), 한국헌법학회
- 김명식, "성적 자기결정권의 헌법적 근거에 대한 재고찰", 성균관법학, 15(2), pp.21~44 (2003), 법학연구소
- 김일환, "性的 自己決定權의 憲法上 導出根據에 관한 批判的 檢討", 헌법학연구, 12(2), pp.107~140 (2006), 한국헌법학회
- 박미숙, "성폭력관련법률의 체계화 방안", 형사정책, 12(2) (2000), 한국형사정책학회
- 박혜진, "형법상 성적 자기결정권 개념에 대한 성찰", 형사법연구, 21(3), pp.229~252 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 이용식, "판례를 통해서 본 성(性)에 대한 법인식의 변화 - 혼인빙자간음죄·강간죄·간통죄를 중심으로 -", 형사법연구, 21(4), pp.295~314 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 이훈동, "한국의 성문화와 형사법", 외법논집, (25), pp.41~61 (2007), 법학연구소
- 조국, "혼인빙자간음죄 위헌론 소고", 형사법연구, 21(3), pp.253~266 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 瀧川裕英, "自己決定と自己責任の間-法哲學的考察", 法學セミナー (2001), 日本評論社
- 田中成明, "現代法の展望: 自己決定の諸相" (2004), 有斐閣
- Alfred A. Göbel, "Die Einwilligung im Strafrecht als Ausprägung des Selbstbestimmungsrechts" (1992), Verlag Peter Lang
- Oliver Tolmein, "Selbstbestimmungsrecht und Einwilligungsfähigkeit" (2004), Mabuse-verlag
