조사자증언제도에 대한 비판적 소고(小考)
Critical Analysis on Investigator’s Testimony in Court
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It has been 5 years since Korean Criminal Procedure Code amended extensively. Through this 2007 amendment, the investigator’s testimony in court could admissible as an evidence by Art. 316, which is related to the hearsay statements. The trial-oriented court proceeding was emphasized in the 2007 amendment and this investigator’s testimony code was also the part of it. If the scholars want to treat investigator’s testimony in court as a part of the trial-oriented court proceeding, however, it should be on the premise that the code about the protocol of suspect examination written by police officer or prosecutor(Art. 312) has to be revised. Korean criminal procedure code still grants the document form of police officer or prosecutor as an evidence, and accepts the statement form of them as an evidence at the same time. This brings the crucial structural contradiction to the law construction and even to the law enforcement. As long as this situation maintains, it can be possibile that illegal investigation would be brought into being and the defendant’s right to defend himself would be infringed. Now, it is the right time to solve this ironical issue with the fundamental decision. If the report of suspect examination written by prosecutor could be inadmissible, the investigator’s testimony in court would be able to carry out its original purpose.
Abstract
It has been 5 years since Korean Criminal Procedure Code amended extensively. Through this 2007 amendment, the investigator’s testimony in court could admissible as an evidence by Art. 316, which is related to the hearsay statements. The trial-oriented court proceeding was emphasized in the 2007 amendment and this investigator’s testimony code was also the part of it. If the scholars want to treat investigator’s testimony in court as a part of the trial-oriented court proceeding, however, it should be on the premise that the code about the protocol of suspect examination written by police officer or prosecutor(Art. 312) has to be revised. Korean criminal procedure code still grants the document form of police officer or prosecutor as an evidence, and accepts the statement form of them as an evidence at the same time. This brings the crucial structural contradiction to the law construction and even to the law enforcement. As long as this situation maintains, it can be possibile that illegal investigation would be brought into being and the defendant’s right to defend himself would be infringed. Now, it is the right time to solve this ironical issue with the fundamental decision. If the report of suspect examination written by prosecutor could be inadmissible, the investigator’s testimony in court would be able to carry out its original purpose.
참고문헌 (24)
- 법원행정처, "형사소송법 개정법률 해설" (2007)
- 김석우, "개정 형소법 관련 독일의 실무 운영 상태보고", 대검찰청 e-pros국제협력DB, ~
- 김환수, "조사자증언의 요건, 범위와 한계, In 형사재판의 쟁점과 과제" (2008)
- 권순민, "형사소송법상 조사자증언제도의 합리적 운영방안", 법학논총, 34(2), pp.457~485 (2010), 법학연구소
- 박종렬, "조사자 증언제도에 대한 고찰", 법학연구, (36), pp.289~305 (2009), 한국법학회
- 변필건, "조사경찰관에 의한 전문진술의 현출방안에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 형사법의 신동향, (19) (2009)
- 서보학, "개정형사소송법에 의한 수사조서 및 영상녹화물의 증거능력", 사법, 1(3), pp.161~195 (2008), 사법발전재단
- 신이철, "형사증거법상의 조사자(특히, 조사경찰관) 증언에 대한 소고", 외법논집, 33(4), pp.331~358 (2009), 법학연구소
- 심재무, "피의자진술의 법정현출방식과 조사자증언의 증거능력", 비교형사법연구, 12(1), pp.307~331 (2010), 한국비교형사법학회
- 李 完 揆, "被告人의 警察 陳述을 內容으로 하는 搜査警察官 證言의 證據能力", 저스티스, (78), pp.142~160 (2004), 한국법학원
- 이완규, "공판중심주의와 증거법의 이상, 현실 그리고 미래, In 민주사회를 위한변론", pp.5~ (2005)
- 이완규, "개정 형사소송법에서의 수사절차상 진술의 증거능력", 형사법의 신동향, (8) (2007)
- 오기두, "증거법규정 신 · 구 조문대비표", 형사사법 토론회 자료집 (2005)
- 이은모, "개정 형사소송법에 있어서의 수사절차상 진술의 증거능력에 관한 검토", 동북아법연구, 1(2) (2007)
- 이호중, "형사절차와 인권 -사법제도개혁추진위원회의 형소법 개정안을 중심으로-", 한양법학, 19 (2006)
- 임웅, "개정 형사소송법 제316조에 대한 고찰 - 조사자 증언제도를 중심으로-", 성균관법학, 23(2), pp.211~235 (2011), 법학연구소
- 정광진, "형사소송법상 조사자증언제도의 도입과 경찰 수사절차의 변화방향", 법학논총, 29(1), pp.29~53 (2012), 법학연구소
- 정웅석, "개정 형사소송법의 평가와 향후과제", 저스티스, (101), pp.205~235 (2007), 한국법학원
- 정웅석, "조서와 진술의 증거능력 관계", 제1회 동아시아 형사사법 국제학술대회 : 형사사법의 정비방안 (2006)
- 조현욱, "형사소송법개정안에 나타난 전문증거의 문제점과 개선방안", 법학연구, (23), pp.443~460 (2006), 한국법학회
- 차용석, "사법경찰관의 수사서류의 증거능력", 고시계 제436호, ~ (1993)
- 千鎭豪, "피고인의 경찰 진술을 내용으로 하는 증언의 증거능력에 대한 재검토", 저스티스, (84)통권 : 84, pp.221~232 (2005), 한국법학원
- 한동훈, "미국 형사사법상 주요제도의 실무운용에 대한 검토 - 우리실무와의 비교를 중심으로", 해외연수검사논문, 22 (2006)
- 한인섭, "국민참여재판과 경찰관 법정증언제도", 치안정책리뷰, (7) (2008)