증거법 분야의 개정방안
A Review of Reform Proposal in Evidence Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Criminal procedure law was changed in full width in 2007. A lot of parts of the reformed law are by and large satisfactory in that they contributed to the improvement of legality and transparency in investigation procedure and the guarantee of the rights of the suspects or the accused. But there are some parts which need to be amended or complimented because of their faults. Therefore, the Korean Criminal Law Association composed autonomously the committee for reforming such provisions. It discussed direction of reform and concrete regulation,and as a result put out a revised plan. The main purpose of the proposal are connected with the stress on public trial and the high guarantee of defensive rights of the suspects and the accused in criminal procedure. Its concrete contents are as follows: To compliment §308-2(about exclusionary rule), to abolish §312②, to regulate the proviso part in §313① into two parts, to change one of exception causes in §314,to delete the brackets part in §316① and to repair §318-2 for protecting the accused. In this paper I examined the proposal and its contents in critical consideration. From my point of view it seems to be very appropriate. Because the proposal is totally in harmony with the idea of emphasis on vitalization of public trial, the procedural dimension of truth-concept, the protection of defensive rights of the accused and the intent of hearsay rule.
Abstract
Criminal procedure law was changed in full width in 2007. A lot of parts of the reformed law are by and large satisfactory in that they contributed to the improvement of legality and transparency in investigation procedure and the guarantee of the rights of the suspects or the accused. But there are some parts which need to be amended or complimented because of their faults. Therefore, the Korean Criminal Law Association composed autonomously the committee for reforming such provisions. It discussed direction of reform and concrete regulation,and as a result put out a revised plan. The main purpose of the proposal are connected with the stress on public trial and the high guarantee of defensive rights of the suspects and the accused in criminal procedure. Its concrete contents are as follows: To compliment §308-2(about exclusionary rule), to abolish §312②, to regulate the proviso part in §313① into two parts, to change one of exception causes in §314,to delete the brackets part in §316① and to repair §318-2 for protecting the accused. In this paper I examined the proposal and its contents in critical consideration. From my point of view it seems to be very appropriate. Because the proposal is totally in harmony with the idea of emphasis on vitalization of public trial, the procedural dimension of truth-concept, the protection of defensive rights of the accused and the intent of hearsay rule.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김형진, "공판외 진술의 증거능력, 형사증거법(하)", 재판자료, 23, pp.203~ (1984)
- 노명선, "형사소송법", pp.502~ (2009), 성균관대학교 출판부
- 배종대, , pp.567~569 (2009), 홍문사
- 배종대, , pp.604~ (2006), 홍문사
- 백형구, , pp.325~, 박영사
- 법무부, "개정 형사소송법", 2007
- 법원행정처,
- 법원행정처, "형사소송법 개정법률 해설", pp.139~
- 법원행정처, "형사소송법 개정법률 해설", pp.124~ (2007)
- 변종필, "형사소송법 개정의 역사와 전망", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.61~86 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 변종필, "형사소송에서 진실개념" (1999), 세종출판사
- 서보학, "「증거」분야의 개정방안, In 형사소송법 개정의 쟁점과 검토", pp.2010, 한국형사정책연구원
- 서보학, "개정형사소송법에 의한 수사조서 및 영상녹화물의 증거능력", 사법, 1(3), pp.161~195 (2008), 사법발전재단
- 손동권, "형사소송법", pp.549~550 (2008), 세창출판사
- 신동운, "간추린 신형사소송법", pp.325~ (2007), 법문사
- 신동운, "신형사소송법", pp.1071~
- 신동운, , pp.1080~ (2009), 법문사
- 신양균, , pp.748~ (2009), 화산미디어
- 이완규, "형사소송법 연구Ⅰ", pp.545~ (2008), 탐구사
- 이은모, "형사소송법", pp.542~ (2010), 박영사
- 이재상, , pp.545~ (2008), 박영사
- 임동규, , pp.464~466 (2009), 법문사
- 정웅석, "형사소송법 전정제3판", pp.347~ (2009), 대명출판사
- 심희기, "형사소송법판례(제3판)", pp.990~ (2005), 홍문사
- 조국, "검사작성 피의자신문조서와 영상녹화물의 증거능력", 저스티스, (107), pp.171~192 (2008), 한국법학원
- 차용석, , pp.499~ (2008), 21세기사
- 천진호, "수사과정에서의 영상녹화제도의 합리적 운용방향 - 입법연혁적 논의를 중심으로 -", 비교형사법연구, 11(1), pp.279~300 (2009), 한국비교형사법학회
