과학기술의 위험 및 이득 지각에서 감정추단
Affect Heuristic in Risk and Benefit Perceptionof Scientific Technologies
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
여러 과학기술에 대해 사람들이 가진 감정적 심상이 각 과학기술의 위험과 이득을 판단할 때 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 단어 연상 기법을 통해 특정 과학기술에 대해 떠오르는 심상들이 무엇인지 확인하고 그 심상값으로 감정을 측정하였다. 감정추단 가설의 예언대로 과학기술에 대한 전반적인 감정에 따라 해당 과학기술을 더 유익하거나 더 위험하게 지각한다는 것을 확인하였다. 다시 말하면, 사람들이 판단의 대상에 대해 긍정적 감정을 가지고 있으면 부정적 감정을 가진 경우보다 위험을 더 낮게 지각하고 이득은 더 높게 지각하였다. 이와 반대로 부정적 감정을 가지고 있으면 긍정적 감정을 가진 경우보다 위험을 더 높게 지각하고 이득은 더 낮게 지각하였다. 또한 과학기술에 대한 판단에서 지각된 위험과 지각된 이득 간에 부적 상관이 있었다. 감정추단의 작용을 시사하는 이런 결과들을 감정 측정 그리고 과학기술에 대한 의사소통의 필요성 측면에서 논의하였다.
Abstract
We surveyed the emotional images of three kinds of scientific technologies in people's mind and the perception of technologies in terms of their risks and benefits. The contents of the image and their image values were used to estimate the affects on each technology. As an affect heuristic hypothesis predicted, people perceived the technology more beneficial or riskier depending on their overall affect. In other words, those who have positive affect on the technology perceived less risky and more beneficial than those who have negative affect. On the other hand, those who have negative affect on the technology perceived riskier and less beneficial than those who have positive affect. We also found negative relationship between the perceived risk and perceived benefit of each technology. The implications of our findings that suggest affective heuristic were discussed in terms of the measurements of affect and the necessity of communication of scientific technologies with the public.
참고문헌 (22)
- "방폐장 입지에 관한 의사결정에 영향을 미치는 변수", 17, pp.461~475 (2005)
- ". A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Analysis", pp.1085~1096 (1994)
- "Deciding advantageously before knowing advantageous strategy", 275, pp.1293~1295 (1997)
- "Adolesecent health-threatening and health-enhancing behaviors: A study of word association and imagery", 7, pp.143~152 (1995)
- "What drives public accpetance of nanotechnology?", 1, pp.153~155 (2006)
- ". Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist", pp.709~724 (1994)
- "The affect heuristic in judgment of risks and benefits", 13, pp.1~17 (2000)
- "Risk as value: Combining affect and analysis in risk judgments", 9, pp.141~164 (2006)
- "Judgement and decision making: The dance of affect and reason" (2003), New York: Cambridge University Press
- "A psychometric stud of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits'. Policy Sciences", pp.127~152 (1978)
- "Introduction - Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now" (2002), New York: Cambridge University Press
- "The case for mental imagery" (2006), New York: Oxford University Press
- "Public attitudes toward emerging technologies", 27, pp.240~267 (2005)
- "Public perceptions of science and technology: A comparative study of the European Union, the United States, Japan, and Canada" (1997), Madrid: BBV Foundation
- "The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power", 26, pp.1427~1453 (1996)
- "Affective asynchrony and the measurement of the affective attitude component", 21, pp.300~329 (2007)
- ". Thoughts beyond words When language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology", pp.166~183 (1993)
- "The empirical case for two systems of reasoning", 119, pp.3~22 (1996)
- "The perception of risk" (2000), London: Earthscan
- "The affect heuristic" (2002), New York: Cambridge University Press
- "and the politics of nuclear waste. Science", pp.1603~1607 (1991)
- "stigma and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in nevada. Risk Analysis", pp.~696 (1991)