본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Difficulties of Creating Cooperative Behavior in Labor-Management Cooperation (LMC)

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류행정학

초록

Supporting employee involvement and participation in decision-making processes, labor-management cooperation (LMC) has been emerged as a new paradigm to improve job satisfaction and performance in the field of public labor relations. Although researchers and practitioners in labor relations have been interested in the new practices, there have been some difficulties to adopt cooperative behavior in LMC. Based on the assumption, this study addresses some causes for the difficulties of creating cooperative behavior in labor-management cooperation as following dimensions. At the individual dimension, this study points out the two reasons: 1) the lack of social relationship and 2) managerial incompetence. On the other hand, at the environmental level, this study notes the characteristics of cultural dynamics in an organization. Reviewing these limitations, this study finally suggests some requirements, which call for the preconditions as creating cooperative behavior in labor management.

Abstract

Supporting employee involvement and participation in decision-making processes, labor-management cooperation (LMC) has been emerged as a new paradigm to improve job satisfaction and performance in the field of public labor relations. Although researchers and practitioners in labor relations have been interested in the new practices, there have been some difficulties to adopt cooperative behavior in LMC. Based on the assumption, this study addresses some causes for the difficulties of creating cooperative behavior in labor-management cooperation as following dimensions. At the individual dimension, this study points out the two reasons: 1) the lack of social relationship and 2) managerial incompetence. On the other hand, at the environmental level, this study notes the characteristics of cultural dynamics in an organization. Reviewing these limitations, this study finally suggests some requirements, which call for the preconditions as creating cooperative behavior in labor management.

참고문헌 (41)

  1. Ban, C., "Public Personnel Management: Where Has it Been, Where is itGoing? In Public Personnel Management: Current Concerns, Future Challenges, 3rded.,edited by Carolyn Ban and Norma M. Riccucci" (2002), Longman Publishers
  2. Beil, M, "Consensus Bargaining in Wisconsin State Government: A NewApproach to Labor Negotiation", Public Personnel Management, 27(1), pp.39~50 (1998)
  3. Bennett, J. T, "The Future of Public Sector Labor-Management Relations", Journal of Labor Research, 24(4), pp.533~544 (2003)
  4. Bergen, H. B, "Management Prerogatives", Harvard Business Review, 8(1), pp.275~284 (1940)
  5. Block, P, "Stewardship: Choosing Service over Self-Interest" (1993), San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler
  6. Bluestone, B, "Negotiating the Future" (1992), Basic Books
  7. Bowditch, J. L, "A Premier on Organizational Behavior" (1997), JohnWiley & Sons, Inc
  8. Bradford, D. L, "Managing for Excellence: The Guide to Developing HighPerformance in Contemporary Organizations" (1984), Wiley John & Sons
  9. Brock, W. E, "Labor and Management Must Forge New Partnership", Journal of StateGovernment, 60, pp.3~5 (1987)
  10. Chandler, M. K, "Management Rights and Union Interests" (1964), McGraw-Hill
  11. Chrislip, D. P., "Collaborative Leadership: How Citizens and Civic LeadersCan Make a Difference" (1994), Jossey-Bass
  12. Cohen, S. G, "New Approaches to Teams and Teamwork. In Organizing for the Future: TheNew Logic for Managing Complex Organizations, edited by Jay R. Galbraith" (1993), Jossey-Bass
  13. Culbert, S. A, "How Reality Gets Constructed in an Organization. InHuman Systems Development, edited by Robert Tannenbaum, Newton Margulies, and FredMassarik" (1985), Jossey-Bass
  14. Delaney, J. T, "Workplace Cooperation: Current Problems, New Approaches", Journal of LaborResearch, 17(1), pp.45~61 (1996)
  15. Denison, D. R, "Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness", 6(2), pp.204~223 (1995)
  16. Dobel, J. P, "Paradigms, Traditions, and Keeping the Faith", Public Administration Review, 61(2), pp.166~171 (2001)
  17. Donald, C. G, "A Partnership for Strategic Planning andManagement in a Public Organization", Public Performance & Management Review, 25(2), pp.176~193 (2001)
  18. Graham,P, "Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management" (1995), Harvard Business SchoolPress
  19. Heckscher, C. C, "The New Unionism" (1988), Basic Books
  20. Kearney, R. C, "Labor Relations in the Public Sector, 3rded" (2001), MarcelDekker
  21. Kearney, R. C, "Labor-Management Relations and Participative DecisionMaking: Toward a New Paradigm", Public Administration Review, 54(1), pp.44~51 (1994)
  22. Kochan, T. A, "The Transformation of American IndustrialRelations" (1986), Basic Books
  23. Kotter, J. P, "Power and Influence" (1985), Free Press
  24. Krim, R. M, "Quality of Work life in City Hall: Toward an Integration ofPolitical and Organizational Realities", Public Administration Quarterly, 13(1), pp.14~30 (1989)
  25. Lawler, E. E, "High-Involvement Management" (1986), Jossey-Bass
  26. Lawler, E. E, "The Ultimate Advantage: Creating the High-Involvement Organization" (1992), Jossey-Bass
  27. Lawler, E. E, "Impact of Employee Participation in the Development of PayIncentive Plans", Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(6), pp.467~471 (1969)
  28. Lawler, E. E, "Employee Involvement and Total QualityManagement: Practices and Results in Fortune 1000 Companies" (1992), San Francisco:Jossey-Bass
  29. Milinski, M. S, "Obstacles to Sustaining a Labor-Management Partnership: A ManagementPerspective", Public Personnel Management, 27(1), pp.11~21 (1998)
  30. Mitchell, T. R, "Leadership Failures, the Distributing Public, and Prospects ofthe Administrative State", Public Administration Review, 47, pp.445~452 (1987)
  31. Mohrman, S. A, "Participative Managerial Behavior and OrganizationalChange", Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1(1), pp.45~59 (1988)
  32. Ospina, S., "Understanding Cooperative Behavior in Labor ManagementCooperation: A Theory-Building Exercise", Public Administration Review, 63(4), pp.455~471 (2003)
  33. Perline, M. M, "Union Views of Managerial Prerogative Revisited: The Prospects forLabor-Management Cooperation", Journal of Labor Research, 20(1), pp.147~154 (1999)
  34. Peters, T. J, "In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-runCompanies" (1982), New York: Harper & Row
  35. Peterson, R. B., "Lessons from Labor-Management Cooperation", CaliforniaManagement Review, 31(1), pp.40~53 (1988)
  36. Robertson, P. J, "Collaborative Organizing: An “Ideal Type” for a New Paradigm", Research inOrganization Change and Development, 12, pp.205~267 (1999)
  37. Schein, E. H, "Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Stein, L. 2003. The Political Context of Public Personnel Administration. In Public PersonnelAdministration: Problems and Prospects, 4thed., edited by Steven W. Hays and Richard C.Kearney" (2003), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
  38. Thomann, D. A, "Managing Collaborative Organizations in the 90s", Industrial Management, 34, pp.26~29 (1992)
  39. Thompson, F. J., "Drug Testing in the Federal Workplace: AnInstrumental and Symbolic Assessment", Public Administration Review, 51(6), pp.515~525 (1991)
  40. Van Riper, P.P, "Some Anomalies in the Deep History of U.S. Public Administration", PublicAdministration Review, 57(3), pp.218~222 (1997)
  41. Yukl. G, "Leadership in Organizations" (2002), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)