본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

파생상품거래에 있어서의 이사의 책임

The liability of directors on the derivatives transaction

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Since the advent of derivatives, companies began to use derivatives transactions in order to avoid the losses by controlling the internal and external factors in the market. Derivatives in the conventional was used to ensure stable prices and supplies of raw material(oil, steel, grain ect.). But in recent years, it is used to avoid the losses that caused by exchange rate fluctuations, as well as a variety of reasons, including climate change. The KIKO case is that the derivatives trading for hedging the losses of exchange fluctuations is the case in question. In that case, litigations is ongoing between banks and companies, but looking at the case of U.S.A. and Japan, in the future the company's board members will represent a claim. So, in this article, liability and duties of directors on the derivatives transactions will be discussed. First, we consider whether the derivatives transaction to avoid losses is within the purpose of the company or not. The purpose of derivatives transactions can be classified as hedging, arbitrage, speculation according to the purpose of traders. Derivatives transactions for hedging and arbitrage is within the purpose of the company Second, if the derivatives transaction is within the purpose of the company, directors have fiduciary duties. Thus, they have duties to install and operate risk management systems in derivatives trading. If they have violated such duties, it will be responsible for losses caused by that transaction. Third, because the value of derivatives is linked to underlying assets, losses caused by losses caused by that transaction will be determined not in transaction time but in the future. So, directors may be held responsible for the variable that they cannot control. But, because this is very unreasonable, it is necessary to limit the liability of directors by applying the business judgment rule.

Abstract

Since the advent of derivatives, companies began to use derivatives transactions in order to avoid the losses by controlling the internal and external factors in the market. Derivatives in the conventional was used to ensure stable prices and supplies of raw material(oil, steel, grain ect.). But in recent years, it is used to avoid the losses that caused by exchange rate fluctuations, as well as a variety of reasons, including climate change. The KIKO case is that the derivatives trading for hedging the losses of exchange fluctuations is the case in question. In that case, litigations is ongoing between banks and companies, but looking at the case of U.S.A. and Japan, in the future the company's board members will represent a claim. So, in this article, liability and duties of directors on the derivatives transactions will be discussed. First, we consider whether the derivatives transaction to avoid losses is within the purpose of the company or not. The purpose of derivatives transactions can be classified as hedging, arbitrage, speculation according to the purpose of traders. Derivatives transactions for hedging and arbitrage is within the purpose of the company Second, if the derivatives transaction is within the purpose of the company, directors have fiduciary duties. Thus, they have duties to install and operate risk management systems in derivatives trading. If they have violated such duties, it will be responsible for losses caused by that transaction. Third, because the value of derivatives is linked to underlying assets, losses caused by losses caused by that transaction will be determined not in transaction time but in the future. So, directors may be held responsible for the variable that they cannot control. But, because this is very unreasonable, it is necessary to limit the liability of directors by applying the business judgment rule.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. GARNER, Bryan A, "Black's Law Dictionary", pp.165~ (2008), Thomson West
  2. John C. Hull, "Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives(7th)", pp.1~ (2009), Pearson Prentice Hall
  3. 菅原菊志, "判例商法(上)", pp.122~ (1993), 神山社
  4. 권기범, "현대회사법론", pp.65~ (2005), 삼지원
  5. 김대연, "주주대표소송과 경영판단의 원칙", 상사법연구, 17(3), pp.144~ (1999), 한국상사법학회
  6. 김영선, "이사의 충실의무", 인천법학논총, 2, pp.85~ (1999), 인천대학교 법학연구소
  7. 류혁선, "파생상품거래의 규제에 관한 법적 연구", 박사, pp.2010
  8. 손주찬, "상법(상)", pp.795~ (2004), 박영사
  9. 송인방, "이사의 책임제한과 경영판단의 원칙", 법학연구, (31), pp.263~286 (2008), 한국법학회
  10. 심인숙, "「자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률」상 장외파생상품 개념에 관한 고찰", 상사법연구, 27(3), pp.265~320 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  11. 오성근, "경영판단원칙의 적용기준의 법리에 관한 검토", 기업법연구, 20(1), pp.9~40 (2006), 한국기업법학회
  12. 이철송, "회사법 제18판", pp.600~ (2010), 박영사
  13. 임재연, "자본시장법(2011년판)", pp.59~ (2011), 박영사
  14. 정경영, "상법학강의", pp.536~ (2009), 박영사
  15. 정대, "株式會社 理事의 內部統制義務에 관한 硏究 -대법원 2008.9.11. 선고 2006다68636 판결-", 상사판례연구, 21(4), pp.169~202 (2008), 한국상사판례학회
  16. 정대, "株式會社의 派生金融商品去來에 관한 理事의 責任에 관한 硏究 -日本의 야쿠르트本社 株主代表訴訟 抗訴審 判決을 中心으로-", 상사판례연구, 23(1), pp.545~578 (2010), 한국상사판례학회
  17. 정동윤, "회사법", pp.51~ (2001), 법문사
  18. 정순섭, "금융규제법상 포괄개념 도입의 가능성과 타당성 - 자본시장통합법상 금융투자상품의 개념을 중심으로", 서울대학교 법학, 49(1), pp.281~314 (2008), 법학연구소
  19. 정찬형, "회사법강의(제3판)", pp.73~ (2003), 박영사
  20. 정회철, "상법학(상)", pp.293~ (1989), 박영사
  21. 최기원, "상법학신론(상)", pp.921~ (2007), 박영사
  22. 최준선, "회사법(제2판)", pp.83~ (2006), 삼영사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)