본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

회사형 집합투자기구의 법적구조 개선방안

A study on the legal structure of company collective investment scheme

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

This article suggests that the Capital Market and Financial Investment Industry Act of Korea (the Act) should prepare investors for protective systems and various investment structures. Under the Act, all investment frameworks which are within the limits of the possible in Korean law regulated by the term “collective investment scheme.” This article, however, says that it is more necessary to discuss a suitable legal system and protective systems for investors. Also, Korean Commercial Code which is amended on April, 2011 is the points to be specially considered. This article intended to discuss the controversial issue and legal problem of the collective investment scheme under the Act. The concrete arguments are as follows. First, private equity fund under the Act should adequately change legal system and structure of limited partnership association as amended Korean Commercial Code enforced a new system, limited partnership association. Second, a investment limited liability company should be introduced under the Act because amended Korean Commercial Code implemented a limited liability company (LLC). Third, the Act needs an additional protective system for financial investors. Korean Commercial Code abolished the regulation of limitation as to small business and closing. But protective system for investors have been weakened in this situation. Thus, it is necessary for an additional protective system under the Act. Fourth, it is proper to repeal a system of investment limited partnership company and to diversify union types of, which are like a Japanese legislation, collective investment scheme under the Act because a limited partnership company has strong human elements. In conclusion, it is possible to protect for financial investors with introduction of definite and specific legal system under the Act. It is necessary to amend the systems of collective investment scheme under the Act.

Abstract

This article suggests that the Capital Market and Financial Investment Industry Act of Korea (the Act) should prepare investors for protective systems and various investment structures. Under the Act, all investment frameworks which are within the limits of the possible in Korean law regulated by the term “collective investment scheme.” This article, however, says that it is more necessary to discuss a suitable legal system and protective systems for investors. Also, Korean Commercial Code which is amended on April, 2011 is the points to be specially considered. This article intended to discuss the controversial issue and legal problem of the collective investment scheme under the Act. The concrete arguments are as follows. First, private equity fund under the Act should adequately change legal system and structure of limited partnership association as amended Korean Commercial Code enforced a new system, limited partnership association. Second, a investment limited liability company should be introduced under the Act because amended Korean Commercial Code implemented a limited liability company (LLC). Third, the Act needs an additional protective system for financial investors. Korean Commercial Code abolished the regulation of limitation as to small business and closing. But protective system for investors have been weakened in this situation. Thus, it is necessary for an additional protective system under the Act. Fourth, it is proper to repeal a system of investment limited partnership company and to diversify union types of, which are like a Japanese legislation, collective investment scheme under the Act because a limited partnership company has strong human elements. In conclusion, it is possible to protect for financial investors with introduction of definite and specific legal system under the Act. It is necessary to amend the systems of collective investment scheme under the Act.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Alastair Hudson, "The Law on Investment Entities", pp.218~, Sweet&Maxwell
  2. Daniel S. Kleinberger, "Agency, Partnerships, and LLCs", Wolters Kluwer
  3. James M. Storey, "Mutual Fund Law Handbook", pp.2-5~2-6 (1988), Glasser Legalworks
  4. Timothy Spangler, "The Law of Private Investment Funds", pp.12~ (2008), Oxford
  5. "금융감독원 보도자료, ‘금산법 및 동법 시행령 개정에 따른 감독규정 등 개정’", 2007.4.27, ~ (2007)
  6. 사모투자전문회사(PEF)제도 도입 2년의 성과분석 및 평가, , 금융감독원, ~ (2006)
  7. 금융감독원, "금융감독개론", pp.335~ (2011)
  8. "금융투자협회 종합통계서비스"[URL]
  9. 기획재정부, "2008년 세재개편(안)문답자료", pp.36~ (2008)
  10. 김건식, "자본시장법", pp.566~ (2009), 두성사
  11. 金融審議會, "投資サービス(假稱)を向けて", pp.39~ (2005)
  12. 박정훈, "사모투자전문회사(Private Equity Fund)도입배경 및 경과", BFL, (10), pp.49~51 (2005)
  13. 박철영, "신종집합투자기구 운영체계의 문제점, IN 자본시장규제의 현황과 과제", 건국대학교 법학전문대학원ㆍ법학연구소 국제학술대회, pp.76~ (2010)
  14. 법령제정 실무작업반, "간접투자(펀드)해설", pp.26~28 (2006), 박영사
  15. 변제호, "자본시장법", pp.589~ (2009)
  16. 山下友信, "金融商品取引法槪説", pp.37~38 (2010), 有斐閣
  17. 서완석, "합자회사 형태를 취하는 사모투자전문회사의 법적 문제점", 외법논집, (31), pp.509~550 (2008), 법학연구소
  18. 손영철, "사모투자전문회사 과세제도에 관한 연구", 세무사, 25(2), pp.64~ (2007), 한국세무사학회
  19. 손영철, "금융상품과 세법 -펀드세무를 중심으로-", pp.296~ (2011)
  20. 손주찬, "주석 상법Ⅱ〔회사(1)〕", pp.121~
  21. 오성근, "일본의 금융상품거래법상 집합투자기구(펀드) 법제에 관한 고찰 - 우리나라 자본시장통합법(안)과 비교를 중심으로", 법과 정책, 13(1), pp.215~216 (2007)
  22. 윤성승, "PEF와 사모투자전문회사", pp.65~ (2007)
  23. 윤희웅, "사모투자전문회사의 합자회사 형태에 따른 법적 문제점", BFL, (10), pp.20~ (2005)
  24. 자본시장통합법상 증권규제와 집합투자규제에 관한 비교법적 연구, "이준호", 한국법제연구원, 106~ (2008)
  25. 이철송, "회사법강의", pp.72~
  26. 日野 正晴, "詳解 金融商品取引法", pp.40~41 (2008), 中央経済社
  27. 재정경제부, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률안 설명자료", pp.57~ (2006)
  28. 재정경제부, "금융투자업과 자본시장에 관한 법률(가칭)」제정 방안", pp.44~ (2006)
  29. 정경영, "상법학강의", pp.734~
  30. 소규모 회사〔Small Business〕활성화를 위한 기업법제 개선 비교 연구, "정경영", 법무부, 22~ (2010)
  31. 조상욱, "Netizen Fund의 투자자 보호상의 문제", 증권법연구, 2(2), pp.132~ (2001)
  32. 川村正幸, "金融商品取引法", pp.392~ (2009), 中央経済社
  33. 최준선, "회사법", pp.761~
  34. 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법〔주석서Ⅱ〕", pp.183~ (2009), 박영사
  35. 현투증권주식회사, "투자신탁의 이론과 실무", pp.560~ (2002), 무한

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)