본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

간접투자에 대한 규제의 통일성 확보방안

Toward th systematic and unificated regulation of collective investment schemes in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

Recently, some investment funds laws, which had regulated various financial institutes on the basis of separated financial sectors, were consolidated in ꡒthe law of collectve investment schemesꡓ under the idea of functional regulation. The objects of consolidated regulation are the securites investments trusts, securities investment companies, monetary trusts of banks, variable insurance in insurance sectors, and wrap accounts. But the law involves various problems from the view of unifiable idea of global financial legal system in Korea. Above all, the law is estimated as a half success because the sector of Real Estate Investment Trusts is exempted from application area without any rational reasons, but because of conflict of interests between the relating governmental ministries. The second problem exists in regulation of investments fund with non-public offering. Although the legislator intended exemption from any regulation over the private investment funds, the law still contains the regulative provisons and moreover founded a new system of private equity fund whose purpose consist in the acquiring the equity of another companies. Its regulating provisions consist of definition of legal form of company, restriction of fund operation, and some qualification of a general partner, etc. But this kind of ideas counter to fundamental spirit of global legal system, private autonomy. Thirdly, the newly adopted governance system, namely the institution of corporation directors and supervisory directors within the investment companies may be described as ꡐsnake legsꡑ and lead to some conflicts to the general principles in our whole legal system. Finally in addition, the new law is confronted with some tasks such as imposing the duty of positive exercising the voting rights on collective investment schemes, and establishing the precise provisions of delict liabilities.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. "증권투자신탁의 몇가지 법적 쟁점", 4(2) (2003)
  2. 건설교통부, "간접투자자산운용업법" (2003)
  3. "기관투자자의 의결권행사에 관한 연구", 14(2)
  4. "제241회 국회(임시회) 재졍경제위원회 회의록"", (4) (2003)
  5. "부동산투자신탁(REITs)의 법체계와 부동산투자회사법의 발전"", 3(1) (2002)
  6. "주요국의 會社型 投資信託制度" (1998)
  7. "투자신탁해설" (2001), 삼우사
  8. "자산운용업법 제정요강을 통해서 본 통합법 제정의 기본방향", (35) (2002)
  9. "은행신탁에 관한 소고", pp.97~6
  10. "EU 은행,증권법" (1996), 박영사
  11. "공모의 법적 규제 - 영국과 독일의 규율을 중심으로-", 1(1) (2000)
  12. "기관투자자의 기업지배적 역할", 22(2) (2003)
  13. "투자신탁펀드의 지배구조에 관한 비교법적 연구", 2(2) (2001)
  14. "자산운용협회 조사팀 독일의 부동산투자신탁 법제와 운영사례 조사475-22"
  15. "Netizen Fund의 투자자보호상의 문제", 2(2) (2001)
  16. "기관투자자의 의결권행사 활성화" (2001)
  17. "자산운용업법(안) 시행시 달라지는 모습들"", (44) (2002)
  18. "한국, 미국의 부동산투자신탁 현황과 시사점" (2002)
  19. "歐美의 투자신탁제도", pp.97~9, 투자신탁협회 기획팀
  20. "우리나라 부동산투자신탁의 운용사례 및 시사점" (2003)
  21. "상법강의( 상)" (2004), 박영사.
  22. "회사법강의" (2003), 박영사.
  23. "상법강의 상" (1999), 법문사
  24. "통합금융법 제정연구 - 금융상품 금융업무 및 금융업 구분에 관한 경제학적 검토" (2003)
  25. "Company Law" (1995), Jordans
  26. "A Larger Role for Institutional Investors", Clarendon Press 1994.
  27. "An Agenda for Institutional Investors"
  28. "Report on consolidation in the financial sector" (2001), Basel
  29. "The Institutional Investor - Investment from M&G’s Viewpoint Contemporary Issues in Corporate Governance", Clarendon Press 1993.
  30. "Financial Markets and Institutions" (2003)
  31. "Company Law" (1995), Sweet & Maxwell
  32. "A Consultation Document proposing amendments to United Kingdom legislation on the public offers of securites and seeking views on reforming public offers of securities within the European Union" (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)