현행 국정감사제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구

Abstract

The principle of separation of powers under our Constitution, and the principle of representative system, allows checks on the executive power by legislative power. In large part, it can be divided into control of the "government," control of the "president," control of the "administrative government," the authority to inspect state affairs, the right to investigate state affairs, and the right to impeach the president. Across the world, it is common for Congress to conduct a parliamentary inspection on specific state affairs on a negative basis. In addition, the nation's Constitution allows the National Assembly to conduct a parliamentary inspection of the government, a regular probe into all state affairs. On the grounds of the argument for abolition of the parliamentary audit are ① Original meaning of audit ② Difference between surveillance and control of the parliamentary inspection ③ Audit is the regular activities ④ Paralysis of the Government offices ⑤ Overlap Plenary session of the National Assembly, Parliamentary standing committee ⑥ Several Side effects ⑦ So-called "one" parliamentary audit. The argument for improving the inspection of the government can be divided into four areas of corrective action ① Operation of the parliamentary audit ② Preparation stage for the parliamentary audit ③ During the parliamentary audit ④ Follow-up processing of the parliamentary audit. Ultimately, I think the current inspect of the government offices, which has many problems, should be abolished. Measures to streamline the state control system include easing the requirements of the parliamentary investigation system and revitalizing the parliamentary standing committee.