Parliament Reservation and the Basic Rights of Recipients of National Pension: Old Age Pension Reduction System based on Income Activities
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyse whether Article 63-2 of the National Pension Act, which authorizes the administration to decide on the reduction of pension payments for pensioners engaged in income activities, is constitutional. In this paper, it raises the question of whether Article 63-2 of the National Pension Act conforms to the principle of parliamentary reservation based on the Constitution. For this purpose, we use the literature research method which analyzes using the laws related to the subject, the precedents of the Constitutional Court, and the secondary literature. The research results are as follows. Article 63-2 of the National Pension Act entrusts the administration with the power to determine the level of income that is the criterion for reducing pensions that are related to the realization of essential basic rights such as property rights and freedom, which violates the principle of parliamentary reservation. This violates the Constitution by violating the basic rights guaranteed by the Constitution. At the same time, the National Pension Act entrusts the executive with the authority to determine income levels without specific purpose, content, or limitation of delegation, which is contrary to the Constitution, which prohibits comprehensive delegation. In contrast, the current Military Pension Act and the Public Officials Pension Act, through the revision of the law in accordance with the Constitutional Court's unconstitutional ruling, regulate the level of income in the law, which is the standard for pension cuts for pensioners engaged in income activities. Therefore, the applicable provisions of the National Pension Act should be amended in the form of direct discipline in the law, as in the Military Pension Act and the Public Officials Pension Act.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyse whether Article 63-2 of the National Pension Act, which authorizes the administration to decide on the reduction of pension payments for pensioners engaged in income activities, is constitutional. In this paper, it raises the question of whether Article 63-2 of the National Pension Act conforms to the principle of parliamentary reservation based on the Constitution. For this purpose, we use the literature research method which analyzes using the laws related to the subject, the precedents of the Constitutional Court, and the secondary literature. The research results are as follows. Article 63-2 of the National Pension Act entrusts the administration with the power to determine the level of income that is the criterion for reducing pensions that are related to the realization of essential basic rights such as property rights and freedom, which violates the principle of parliamentary reservation. This violates the Constitution by violating the basic rights guaranteed by the Constitution. At the same time, the National Pension Act entrusts the executive with the authority to determine income levels without specific purpose, content, or limitation of delegation, which is contrary to the Constitution, which prohibits comprehensive delegation. In contrast, the current Military Pension Act and the Public Officials Pension Act, through the revision of the law in accordance with the Constitutional Court's unconstitutional ruling, regulate the level of income in the law, which is the standard for pension cuts for pensioners engaged in income activities. Therefore, the applicable provisions of the National Pension Act should be amended in the form of direct discipline in the law, as in the Military Pension Act and the Public Officials Pension Act.
참고문헌 (25)
- Bundesverfassungsgericht, "Absoluter Numerus Clausus fuer Medizinstudium", BVerfGE, 33, pp.303~358 (1972)
- Bundesverfassungsgericht, "Regelung des Fachartztwesens durch Satzungen der Aerztenkammern", BVerfGE, 33, pp.125~171 (1973)
- Bundesverfassungsgericht, "Vorbehalt des Gesetzes fuer Regelungen ueber Entlassung eines Schuelers aus der Schule wegen unzureichender Leistungen", BVerGE, 58, pp.257~283 (1982)
- Constitutional Court, "Article 21 Paragraph 5 Subparagraph 2 of the Military Pension Unconstitutional Application(No. 2001헌가22)", Law Reports, 15(2), pp.231~253 (2003)
- Constitutional Court, "Article 47 No. 3 of the Public Officials Pension Act Unconstitutional Petition(No. 2000헌바94), Article 47 No. 2 of the Public Officials Pension Act unconstitutional application(No. 2001헌가21)", Law Reports, 15(2), pp.254~272 (2003)
- Constitutional Court, "Article 21 Paragraph 5 Subparagraph 3 of the Military Pension Unconstitutional Application(No. 2004헌가24)", Law Reports, 17(2), pp.625~634 (2005)
- Constitutional Court, "Article 21 Paragraph 5 Subparagraph 2 of the Military Pension Unconstitutional Application(No. 2007헌가5)", Law Reports, 21(1), pp.312~320 (2009)
- Constitutional Court, "Article 21 Paragraph 3 Subparagraph 2 of the Military Pension Unconstitutional Application(No. 2009헌가4)", Law Reports, 22(2), pp.95~112 (2010)
- Jesch, D., "Gesetz und Verwaltung" (1968), Mohr
- Kim, S., "National Pension Benefit Plan Improvement II" (2002), National Pension Service
- A Study on the Improvement of the National Pension Scheme for the Promotion of Labor Causes, "Kim, W.", National Pension Research Institute, ~ (2007)
- 김원섭, "근로와 연금수급의 병행 활성화를 위한 국민연금 제도개선에 관한 연구 -조기노령연금과 재직자노령연금의 개선방안-", 사회보장연구, 25(4), pp.187~216 (2009), 한국사회보장학회
- A Study on the Supply and Demand of the Age Pension: Focused on the Early Age Pension, the Working Age Pension, and the deferred Pension Research Report, "Kim, H.", National Pension Service and National Pension Research Institute, ~ (2017)
- Overseas Cases of Pension Reduction According to Income Level, "Kim, H.", National Pension Research Institute, ~ (2018)
- Kwon, Young, "the Theory of Constitutional Academy" (2009), Bobmunsa
- 이미화, "위임입법에 의한 사회정책 통제 -성남시 공공산후조리 지원정책 사례를 중심으로-", 한국지방자치학회보, 30(1), pp.137~162 (2018), 한국지방자치학회[DOI]
- 이신용, "국민건강보험과 의회의 책임성", 한국사회복지학, 60(3), pp.201~230 (2008), 한국사회복지학회[DOI]
- 이신용, "국민기초생활보장제도와 의회의 책임성", 사회복지정책, (34), pp.35~61 (2008), 한국사회복지정책학회[DOI]
- 이신용, "민주화와 사회보장법 규율구조와의 관계", 사회복지정책, 36(3), pp.31~53 (2009), 한국사회복지정책학회[DOI]
- 이신용, "민주주주의, 법치국가, 복지국가의 친화성: 사회보장법에 의회유보(Parlamentsvorbehalt)원칙의 적용과 사회보장제도 발달과의 관계- 한국과 독일비교", 한국사회정책, 17(3), pp.153~189 (2010), 한국사회정책학회[DOI]
- Lee, S., "the Social Security Act and Congress" (2017), Hanul Academy
- National Law Information Center, "Enforcement Decree of the National Pension Act (Presidential Decree No. 29813)", ~
- National Law Information Center, "Military Pension Act(Act No. 15050)", ~
- National Law Information Center, "National Pension Act(Act No. 16240)", ~
- National Law Information Center, "Public Officials Pension Act(Act No. 15554)", ~