본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자율환경규제: 정부규제의 보완재인가 대체재인가?

Self-Environmental Regulation: Is it a complementary or alternative to government regulation?

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류사회과학일반

초록

기존의 환경규제방식의 한계에 대한 대안으로 등장한 자율환경관리제도는 기존에 정부가 주도하는 환경규제의 대상이었던 기업이 규제기관과 피규제집단이라는 고정적이고 양분된 틀에서 벗어나 규제의 주체로서 새로운 역할을 한다는 점에서 실무적인 차원 뿐 아니라 이론적인 측면에서도 기존 규제방식과 구분되는 차별성과 의미를 갖는다. 이 논문은 자율환경관리제도의 환경적 성과에 주목하여, 실질적인 효과 여부와 효과에 영향을 미치는 요인들, 전통적 규제방식을 대체하는 규제대안으로서의 기능, 그리고 시행과정에서의 정부 혹은 다른 이해관계자 집단들의 역할 등을 탐색하였다. 이 논문은 자율환경관리제도의 부분적 성과와 함께 다음과 같은 중요한 시사점을 제시한다. 대안적 환경거버넌스로서의 자율환경프로그램은 기업의 자율성에만 의지해서 작동해서는 기존 규제제도의 대체재로서의 소기의 성과를 달성할 수 없으며, 정부규제와 시민단체, 기타 비정부기구 등 다양한 부문 또는 행위자 집단과의 조화로운 관계 속에서 환경성과를 기대할 수 있다. 이러한 결론은 자발적 환경문제의 해결방식은 정책수단으로서 기존 규제방식과의 조화로운 관계 속에서 다양한 행위주체들과의 협력을 통해 의미 있는 결과를 낳을 수 있다는 것을 의미한다.

Abstract

The autonomous environmental management system, which has emerged as an alternative to the limitations of the existing environmental regulation system, has a distinctive meaning that is distinguished from the existing regulation system in terms of practical and theoretical aspects, in that companies that were the subject of the environmental regulation led by the government have a new role as the subject of regulation, away from the fixed and divided framework of regulatory agencies and regulated groups. This paper focuses on the environmental performance of the autonomous environmental management system, and explores the factors that affect the actual effect and effect, the function as a regulatory alternative to traditional regulatory methods, and the role of the government or other stakeholders in the implementation process. This paper suggests the following important implications along with the partial performance of the autonomous environmental management system. The autonomous environmental program as an alternative environmental governance can not achieve desired results as a substitute for the existing regulatory system if it works only by the autonomy of the company, and it can expect environmental performance in a harmonious relationship with various sectors such as government regulations, civic groups, and other non-governmental organizations or groups of actors.This conclusion means that the solution of voluntary environmental problems can produce meaningful results through cooperation with various actors in a harmonious relationship with existing regulatory methods as a policy tool.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 김기환, "환경규제는 자발적일 수 없는가?: 자율환경협약의 논리와 효과성", 한국공공관리학보, 32(4), pp.79~98 (2018), 한국공공관리학회[DOI]
  2. Environmental Management Systems: Do They Improve Performance? Project Final Report for US EPA, "Andrews, R.", Office of Water and Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation, ~ (2003)
  3. Anton, W., "Incentives for Environmental Self-Regulation and Implications for Environmental Performanc", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48(1), pp.632~654 (2004)
  4. Antweiler, W., "Canada’s Voluntary ARET Program : Limited Success Despite Industry Cooperation", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), pp.755~773 (2007)
  5. Arimura, T., "Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument? A case for environmental management system", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(3), pp.281~295 (2008)
  6. Arimura, T., "The Effect of ISO 14001 on Environmental Performance : Resolving Equivocal Findings", Journal of Environmental Management, 166, pp.556~566 (2016)
  7. Blackman, A., "How Does Public Disclosure Work? : Evidence from Indonesia’s PROPER Program", Human Ecology Review, 11, pp.235~246 (2004)
  8. Brouhle, K., "Evaluating the Role of EPA Policy Levers: An Examination of A Voluntary Program and Regulatory Threat in The Metal-Finishing Industry", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57, pp.166~181 (2009)
  9. Bui, Linda, "The Impact of Voluntary Programs on Polluting Behavior : Evidence from Pollution Prevention Programs and Toxic Releases", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64, pp.31~44 (2012)
  10. Coglianese, C., "Regulation from the Inside: CAn Environmental Management System Achieve Policy Goals", pp.1~25 (2001), Resources for the Future Press
  11. Dahlstrom, K., "Environmental Management Systems and Company Performance : Assessing the Case for Extending Risk-Based Regulation, European Environment", The Journal of European Environmental Policy, 13(4), pp.187~203 (2003)
  12. Delmas, M, "Governance for the Environment:New Perspectives", pp.221~238 (2009), Cambridge University Press
  13. Delmas, M., "Free Riding in Voluntary Environmental Programs : The case of the U", S. EPA WasteWise program. Policy Sciences, 38, pp.91~106 (2005)
  14. Delmas, M., "A Framework for Analyzing Environmental Voluntary Agreements", California Management Review, 43(3), pp.44~63 (2001)
  15. Delmas, M., "Voluntary Approaches to Climate Protection: An Economic Assessment of Private-Public Partnerships" (2004), Edward Elgar Publishing
  16. Voluntary Agreements to Improve Environmental Quality: Are Late Joiners the Free Riders?, "Delmas, M.", Institute for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research. University of California, ~ (2007)
  17. Delmas, M., "Governance for the Environment: New Perspectives", pp.3~11 (2009), Cambridge University Press
  18. Delmas, M., "Information Disclosure Policies:Evidence from the Electricity Industry", Economy Inquiry, 48(2), pp.483~498 (2010)
  19. Esty, D., "Thinking Ecologically: The Next Generation of Environmental Policy" (1997), Yale University Press
  20. Karamanos, P., "Voluntary Environmental Agreements : Evolution and Definition of a New Environmental Policy Approach", Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(1), pp.67~84 (2001)
  21. Khanna, M., "Governance for the Environment: New Perspectives", pp.144~182 (2009), Cambridge University Press
  22. Khanna, M., "EPA’s Voluntary Program : Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37, pp.1~25 (1999)
  23. Khanna, M., "Toxic Release Information : A Policy Tool for Environmental Information", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36, pp.243~266 (1998)
  24. King, A., "Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions : The Chemical Industry’s Responsible Care Program", Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), pp.698~716 (2000)
  25. Konar, S., "Information as Regulation : The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, pp.109~124 (1997)
  26. Konar, S., "Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?", The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(2), pp.281~289 (2001)
  27. Kraft, M., "Business and Environmental Policy: Corporate Interests in the American Political System", pp.3~31 (2007), The MIT Press
  28. Lenway, S., "Leaders, Followers, and Free Riders : An Empirical Test of Variation in Corporate Political Involvement", Academy of Management Journal, 34(4), pp.893~905 (1991)
  29. Lyon, T., "Corporate Environmental Strategies as Tools to Influence Regulation", Business Strategy and the Environment, 8, pp.189~196 (1999)
  30. Lyon, T., "Corporate Social Responsibility and the Environment : A Theoretical Perspective", Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), pp.240~260 (2008)
  31. Marcus, A., "Reinventing Environmental Regulation: Lessons from Project XL" (2002), Resources for the Future
  32. Pizer, W. A., "The Performance of Industrial Sector Voluntary Climate Programs: Climate Wise and 1605(b)", Energy Policy, 39, pp.7907~7916 (2011)
  33. Rees, J., "The Development of Communitarian Regulation in the Chemical Industry", Law and Policy, 19(4), pp.477~528 (1997)
  34. Rivera, J., "Assessing a Voluntary Environmental Initiative in the Developing World : The Costa Rican Certification for Sustainable Tourism", Policy Sciences, 35, pp.333~360 (2002)
  35. Schuler, D., "Public Affairs, Issues Management and Political Strategy: Methodological Approaches that Count", Journal of Public Affairs, 1&2(4&1), pp.336~355 (2002)
  36. Sunnevag, K., "Voluntary Agreements and Incentives for Innovation", Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy, 18(5), pp.555~573 (2000)
  37. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, "Environmental Management System", ISO 14001-Frequently Asked Questions, 2010
  38. Vilchez, V., "The Dark Side of ISO 14001 : The Symbolic Environmental Behavior", European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23, pp.33~39 (2016)
  39. Vogel, D., "The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility" (2005), Brookings Institution Press
  40. Welch, E. W., "Voluntary Behavior by Electric Utilities", Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19, pp.407~425 (2000)
  41. Young, O, "The Environmental Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale" (2002), The MIT Press
  42. Determinants of Environmental Innovations in Germany:do organizational measures matter? A Discrete Choice Analysis at the Firm Level, "Ziegler, A.", ZEW, ~, pp.ZEW Discussion Paper 04-30.9 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)