1910년대 김교제 소설의 대중화 전략 연구 -『동양서원』과의 관련성을 중심으로
A Study on the Popularization Strategy of Kim, Kyo-je Novel in 1910s
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper started with an aim to identify the popularization strategy of Kim, kyo-je novel in 1910s. He was a professional writer belonging to Oriental Seowon(東洋書院). As writers belonging to a publishing company have a tendency to be influenced by its business policy, the popularization strategy of profit making, which Oriental Seowon pursued, was seen in the novels of Kim, Kyo-je as well. When Oriental Seowon resumed in 1912, novels were produced and published in its own printing house and bindery. Because it was thought that publishing companies would experience financial difficulties without selling books. So the active popularization strategy made the publisher print novel series with an intention to show the differentiation from classical novels. In addition, books were sold at a discounted price, and at branches and by post for customers in the country. Kim, Kyo-je also tried to make his novels popular actively to sell his novels to the public. Considering the fact people were internalizing Confucian ideology due to Japanese policies in the Japanese compulsory occupation period, he placed the preservation of Confucian value as an axis of the narration in Chiaksan(치악산) and Microscope(현미경). In other words, the novel reflected the public’s desire and psychology. In terms of the public’s desire, the translated novels were the same. As the public’s curiosity on the West was increased when Joseon became civilized, Kim Kyo-je gave a good deal of space to the introduction of western civilization in Airship(비행선) and JijangBosal(지장보살) to correspond with the public’s desire. Readers continue to read books because of mainly their curiosity and inquisitiveness. Unless information is provided, readers cannot help stop reading to gratify their curiosity. Kim Kyo-je used the cancellation and disclose of information resulting from reversed narration as a popularization strategy. The control between cancellation and disclose appeared in both creative novels and translated novels revealed the fact that Kim Kyo-je complied with the management policy of Oriental Seowon to pursue profits with maximized sales. However, it was said that their popularization strategy was not successful. There was excessive competition between publishers in a small book market with limited number of readers. Discounted price proved it well. The publishers at the time usually sold books at a discounted price, which led to press publisher’s finance seriously hard to their closing, not economic gains. At that time, in spite of those various strategies Oriental Sewon and Kim Kyo-je failed in selling books due to the tough situation like this in a book industry.
Abstract
This paper started with an aim to identify the popularization strategy of Kim, kyo-je novel in 1910s. He was a professional writer belonging to Oriental Seowon(東洋書院). As writers belonging to a publishing company have a tendency to be influenced by its business policy, the popularization strategy of profit making, which Oriental Seowon pursued, was seen in the novels of Kim, Kyo-je as well. When Oriental Seowon resumed in 1912, novels were produced and published in its own printing house and bindery. Because it was thought that publishing companies would experience financial difficulties without selling books. So the active popularization strategy made the publisher print novel series with an intention to show the differentiation from classical novels. In addition, books were sold at a discounted price, and at branches and by post for customers in the country. Kim, Kyo-je also tried to make his novels popular actively to sell his novels to the public. Considering the fact people were internalizing Confucian ideology due to Japanese policies in the Japanese compulsory occupation period, he placed the preservation of Confucian value as an axis of the narration in Chiaksan(치악산) and Microscope(현미경). In other words, the novel reflected the public’s desire and psychology. In terms of the public’s desire, the translated novels were the same. As the public’s curiosity on the West was increased when Joseon became civilized, Kim Kyo-je gave a good deal of space to the introduction of western civilization in Airship(비행선) and JijangBosal(지장보살) to correspond with the public’s desire. Readers continue to read books because of mainly their curiosity and inquisitiveness. Unless information is provided, readers cannot help stop reading to gratify their curiosity. Kim Kyo-je used the cancellation and disclose of information resulting from reversed narration as a popularization strategy. The control between cancellation and disclose appeared in both creative novels and translated novels revealed the fact that Kim Kyo-je complied with the management policy of Oriental Seowon to pursue profits with maximized sales. However, it was said that their popularization strategy was not successful. There was excessive competition between publishers in a small book market with limited number of readers. Discounted price proved it well. The publishers at the time usually sold books at a discounted price, which led to press publisher’s finance seriously hard to their closing, not economic gains. At that time, in spite of those various strategies Oriental Sewon and Kim Kyo-je failed in selling books due to the tough situation like this in a book industry.
참고문헌 (23)
- "매일신보", ~
- 김교제, "치악산 하" (1968), 을유문화사
- 김교제, "비행선" (1978), 아세아문화사
- 김교제, "현미경" (1978), 아세아문화사
- 김교제, "지장보살" (1968), 을유문화사
- 권영민, "한국현대문학사 1" (2002), 민음사
- 김석봉, "근대 초기 문화의 생산", 수용에 관한 연구 - 서사 장르의 교섭양상을 중심으로, 2005, pp.(18), 97~130[DOI]
- 김재용, "한국근대민족문학사" (1998), 한길사
- 김종현, "신소설의 상품화 전략 연구", 현대소설연구, (23), pp.183~206 (2004), 한국현대소설학회
- 김종현, "1910년대 신소설 쇠퇴의 대중문화적 요인", 어문학, (100), pp.297~326 (2008), 한국어문학회
- 김종현, "근대 계몽기 소설의 대중화 전략 연구", 박사, pp.2009
- 김창남, "대중문화의 이해" (2010), 한울
- 김태준, "증보조선소설사" (1990), 한길사
- 방효순, "일제시대 민간 서적발행활동의 구조적 특성에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 수요역사연구회, "식민지 조선과 매일신보-1910년대" (2003), 신서원
- 오종호, "개화기 소설의 대중화 과정 연구", 박사, pp.1999
- 이은영, "1910년대 김교제 소설의 근대적 성격 -<목단화>, <현미경>을 중심으로-", 어문학, (85), pp.417~440 (2004), 한국어문학회
- 임규찬, "임화 신문학사" (1993), 한길사
- 임성래, "대중문학을 어떻게 이해할 것인가 in:대중문학이란 무엇인가?" (1995), 평민사
- 최원식, "한국계몽주의문학사론" (2003), 소명출판
- 홍혜원, "김교제 신소설의 대중성 연구", 비평문학, 20, pp.179~205 (2005), 한국비평문학회
- 다지리 히로유끼, "이인직 연구", 박사, pp.2000
- 탬블링, 제레미, "서사학과 이데올로기" (2000), 예림기획
